ced S oT Apast 2 CANADIAN TRIBUNE FLASHBACKS FROM THE COMMUNIST PRESS 50 years ago... POST OFFICE HOLDS UP RADICAL PAPER oa YORK — Post office cen- i ie and radical newspapers against e ‘war has been revived : Martello”, an Italian nei weekly published t Y Carlos Tresca. According » the issue of July 21 Week eld up in the mails for one i eae which time a copy to Washington for cen- » SOrshi Tate Action does not surprise ‘ resca, “for many Fas- Vicious ans in Italy have made ®DDeals acks on Martello, with dor to be the Italian ambassa- in hig a U.S. to do everything MUipresseq to have the paper clare ambassador, Tresca_ de- Ae gins been further moved to Martetiy onatic Pressure against in] ; o€cause it is widelv read Uppree Vere the Fascisti have Ssed €very radical paper. The Worker, Aug. 15, 1923 P exercised against Social- 25 years ago... ROLL BACK EXORBITANT MEAT PRICES I have been canvassing a_To- ronto-Trinity subdivision as a re- presentative of the Consumers Research Council with a petition to “roll back the price of meat.” Canvassing now that meat prices are higher than ever is in- deed timely and I found the peti- tion eagerly accepted and signed. A grandmother ‘said to. me, “What we are going to do? My grandson is 12, my son-in-law has just an ordinary job, and after food is bought there is no money for anything else. We older ones must do without clothes, as of course, the boy does too.” We are able to make clear who is at fault concerning outrageous prices and to tell them that monopoly capital — “big shots” to the average worker — coupled with the refusal of the govern- ment to introduce price controls and subsidies are to blame and _ must be fought. Tribune, August 14, 1948 Usk Bolshevik State .. ; Worth quoting: . is a dictatorship of the proletariat, of the It ' Propertyless masses of the people .. . h peop s taught me three things. Th thoes Clas areaee < true Pubs: blished Weekly at F West Coast edition, Canadian Tribune All other countries, $7.00 one year 4 Ut in Its Property last analysis the property-owning class is loyal only to the . : Working ciety owning class will never readily compromise with e ams, . Aseiog of the workers are capable not only of great Qt they have in them the power to make dreams come —John Reed Editor — MAURICE RUSH ‘ord Bldg., Mezzanine No. 3, 193 E. Hastings St; Bua Vancouver 4, B.C. Phone 685-5288. ; No: Subseri wey & Circulation Manager, FRED WILSON orth Gnd NS ‘on Rate: Canada, $5.00 one year; $3.00 for six months “th America and Commonwealth countries, $6.00 one year. trot ber 1560. Demand real cuts in food prices _ Working people are fed up to the eyeballs with slick talk from fat cat governments and the Prices Review Board about how: we, who try to get by on a weekly wage, or who try to subsist on a pension or other “allow- ance” can tighten our belts. Prices are skyrocketing because mo- nopoly manufacturers and processors, blessed by the government, are milking us for millions of dollars of profits every year — year in and year out. Monopoly’s ears, like its belly, are big; it hears the growing protest and has come up with another anaesthetic — more subsidies. Does anyone believe that subsidies on basic foods such as milk, meat and bread (as the NDP caucus suggested), or, as Beryl Plumptre recommended, that subsidies on milk, eggs, and beans (!) would solve our shopping problems? The Toronto Star, that defender of the working class, devoted 10 inches of editorial space to the magic of a sub- sidy on bread, so it has to be suspect. Subsidies? “Lovely,” shout the mono- polies. In the first six months of 1978, food tsar Weston grabbed $12 million profit; in just 18 weeks Canada Pack- ers raked in almost $4 million; British Columbia Packers skewered us for $4 million in 24 weeks (double what we shelled out to them last year); and Burns, Swifts and others did equally well. What about subsidies? Are we against the farmer making a living? (The ruthless Massey-Ferguson empire robbed him of $37 million in the first nine months of 1973 alone! That was the profit after taxes.) Are we against our senior citizens and widows, the poor and disadvantaged getting a break in what they have to pay for necessities? Certainly not. What we.are against is the federal government saying to meat packers, to the canners, to the food processors, the fish packers and the bakery giants that their profits are sacred. Don’t reduce your prices, says the government; don’t pay your workers a union wage out of your exorbitant profits. Those profits are holy. We'll pay the shot with taxpayers’ blood. It’s time the Ottawa-monopoly alli- ance knew that this is no longer good . enough. Workers need wage increases — the railway workers for instance — be- cause the monopolies snatch everything they earn. Old age pensioners, welfare recipients, those on widows’ pensions and mothers’ allowances, need protec- tion because the chainstore hoods keep raising prices. But the money ‘for a décent living has to come out of the profits stolen from the pockets of the workers — not from the feudal income tax exacted from working people and pensioners. Ever-growing subsidies is a cheap way out for state monopoly capitalism — but it won’t do. The government has to check the profit-robbery that’s going on — has to, for once in its existence, serve the peo- ple — not the monopolies. Who's behind Chile’s civil war threat? The people of Chile, united in their majority with their constitutionally- elected government, and President Sal- vador Allende, are vigorously opposing attempts to foment civil war. Sabotage of transportation by a pri- vileged group of truck owners, the trotting out of dentists and store own- ers in support (which the capitalist press here tries to pawn off on us as a strike, as if they were speaking of the working class) — all lend themselves to the inciters to civil war. The students — are “used” by organizers from the anti- Allende parties. Generals’ wives (!), the very essence of the working class... North American press services are trying to hoax us into thinking that the masses of people who elected the Al- lende government have turned against it. : But who is really trying to smash | the elected government? The world well remembers the confession of the U.S. multi-millionaire International Tele- phone and Telegraph monopoly, that it connived with the CIA and with Chile- an murderers and saboteurs to try to prevent Allende’s election — even by assassination. The international copper monopoly, Kenecott, enraged at losing its grip on the throats of the Chilean workers, failed in a try to ruin Chile’s economy by blocking its world copper trade. But the lust for squeezing millions of dollars — and life — out of Chilean miners has not died. The world remembers the recent mili- tary-coup in Uruguay, bearing the im- print of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. It is not surprising then that fascist groups in Chile find the organizational, financial and material help they seek for plunging the country into devasta- tion. Any flunky who could be thrust into the president’s chair long enough to have his picture taken would be elig- ible for U.S. military aid. ITT offered $1 million to do Allende in in 1970; how much is it offering to- day? The cold-blooded assassination of the President’s aide-de-camp, Captain Ar- turo Araya, and of the trade union lead- er, Oscar Balboa reveals the killer nat- ure of the “opposition.” The World Federation of Trade Unions, stating its solidarity with the Chilean United Workers’ Centre (CUT), with the people of Chile and ‘their legitimate government, (Aug. 9 statement), “calls on the workers and trade unions of all countries to demon- strate their solidarity, and express their support for the patriotic struggle of the ‘working class and people of Chile . . .” in defence of their elected government, and the reforms it has introduced. Outspoken support for the govern- ment of Chile throughout the Canadian labor movement, urgently called for, is a blow in defence of fellow workers striving for a better life, and against their imperialist tormentors. PACIFIC TRIBUNE—FRIDAY, AUGUST 31, 1973—-PAGE 3