{AIL Ti Ty BRITISH COLUMBIA B.C. Communist Party leader Maurice Rush last week called on the federal government to cancel the war games scheduled to take place at Cold Lake Alta., this month. An announcement from the Langley U.S. Air Force base in Virginia said that the military exercise was to involve both U.S. Air Force jets and B-52 long range bombers as well as Canadian and British forces. The fact that the announcement came ‘Cancel war games’ — Rush from Virginia and not Ottawa “indicates how far Canada is being enmeshed in U.S. president Reagan’s nuclear war strategy,” Rush charged. “If Canadian officials did know about it, why was the public not informed?” he asked suggesting that widespread Cana- dian opposition and the election cam- paign were responsible for Ottawa’s silence. He called for cancellation of the war games and of any further such exercises. Brian Mulroney’s Tortes weren’t elected on the strength of their campaign or on the attractiveness of their election platform. The two main factors that were decisive to the Tory sweep were: (1) The people were fed up with the Liberal government which had no pro- gram to provide jobs or get Canada out of the depression. They wanted a change for the better, and many people, includ- ing working people, Were under the illu- sion that the Tories would provide sucha change. Brian Mulroney promised any- thing and everything to create this illu- sion, making scores of promises that his Tory government will never fulfill. (2) The corporate-owned media elected the Tories. Both newspaper chains — Southam and Thomson — supported the Tories, as did CTV. The CBC went along with that sentiment. A survey taken during the election campaign showed that not a single important daily newspaper in Canada supported the Liberals. Most were openly Tory; a few pretended to be neutral. All of them slanted the news to dis- credit the Liberals and paint Mulroney as Mr. Clean and Mr. New. Their public opinion polls were designed to secure the results they wanted. Early in July, when the election was called, public opinion polls showed the Liberals with 49 per cent support com- pared to 39 per cent for the Tories. The corporate-owned media set itself the task of brainwashing the public to produce the opposite result and they succeeded. The Tories ended up with 50 per cent of the popular vote while the Liberals went down to 28 per cent. To help achieve this result a Southam poll conducted Aug. 19-22 even claimed to have come up with a 56.5 per cent vote for the Tories! The distribution of seats in the new House of Commons gives a completely distorted picture of the relative strength of the three major parties. It is one more argument in favor of electoral reform, of a system where party representation is based on percentages of the popular vote rather than individual constituencies. This system is widely used in western Europe. : ¢ Under such a proportional representa- tion system of voting the Tories, with 50 per cent of the votes, would get 141 seats in the 282 member House of Commons, instead of the 211 they have today. The Liberals with 28 per cent would get 79 Harry Rankin seats instead of the 40 they now have- - Tories in action will shrink vote majority popular vote would get 54 seats, instead of the present 30. The Tory approach‘to social issues is basically the same as that of the Bennett government in B.C. — reduce the deficit and increase military expenditures by cutting social services (education, health, unemployment insurance, the civil ser- vice) increase taxes on working people and reduce taxes on big corporations. Most dangerous of all is Mulroney’s intention to turn Canada into a military - satellite of the U.S., with Canadian for- eign policy just an echo of Reagan’s con- frontationist policies. But Mulroney won’t have it all his own way. He was forced to promise dur- ing the election campaign that he would not cut social servcices and will be quickly exposed and opposed when he embarks on this course. Furthermore, he cannot ignore entirely the fact that public opinion polls show 75 to 80 per cent of Canadians favor a nuclear freeze and an end to the arms race. The Tory sweep did not extend into S. B.C. with nearly the same force it did in other provinces. Here the Tory popular vote went up by only five per cent, to 46 per cent, all of it at the expense of the Liberals. The NDP held its vote at 35 per cent, neither gaining nor losing, although the distribution of the vote cost it three seats. The fact of the matter is that the Tories did not get majority support in B.C. I’m notat all disheartened by the elec- tion results. I know that when the Tories begin to implement their right wing poli- cies they will be exposed to those who voted for them in good faith. Their majority support will quickly dwindle, just as did Margaret Thatcher’s support in Britain. : Canadians are not disposed to allow further cuts in their living standards or to - have the whole burden of the depression forced on their shoulders while corporate profits are increasing. That sharp strug- gles will develop against Mulroney’s government is inevitable. The next big electoral battle shaping up is the November municipal election in Vancouver. In the Sept. 4 election the Tories, with the full support of the Social Credit election machine, were able to win only 46 per cent of the popular vote. The progressive forces united around the Committee of Progressive Electors and the unity slate can defeat the Non- Partisan Association, a slate run by the Tory and Social Credit machines. We can elect a progressive majority to city council, the school board and the parks board this year. while the NDP with 19 per cent of the 2 e PACIFIC TRIBUNE, SEPTEMBER 7, 1984 COPE proposes city plebiscite on cruise A motion calling for a civic referendum this fall on cancelling cruise missile testing in Canada is set to go before Vancouver city council Sept. 11, capping a month of peace- related issues. : Committee of Progressive Electors alder- man Bruce Yorke served notice of. the motion which if passed this Tuesday, will _ ask Vancouverites to back city council in requesting the federal government cancel the tests of the first-strike weapon. “Are you in favor of Vancouver city council asking the federal government to exercise its option under the bilateral agreement with the U.S. government, to cancel any further testing of the cruise mis- sile in this country?” is the proposed word- ing for the referendum suggested for the Nov. 17 civic election. Yorke’s motion is the latest of several peace initiatives taken by council since the election of the progressive, labor-backed majority of COPE and independent candi- dates in 1980 and 1982. Of these, most out- standing have been support for a referendum calling on the federal government to pro- mote negotiations for bilateral disarma- ment, the declaration of Vancouver as nuclear-weapons free zone, and moral and financial backing for the annual Walk for Peace event. = Earlier this year, following the April 28 walk, council voted to urged the provincial government to declare B.C. nuclear- weapons free, and to press the federal government for a national referendum on cruise testing. Letters urging similar actions were sent to councils of cities in the Union of B.C. Municipalities, the Greater Vancouver Regional District, the Federation of Cana- dian Municipalities and major Canadian cities. According to a report made to the Aug. : 28 council meeting, 73 municipalities had responded, with a majority favoring the request. An analysis of the responses by city staff showed that of the cities favorably inclined towards disarmament initiatives, several had already taken some form of action — either through disarmament referendums; nuclear-weapons free declarations, OF requests to some higher government — provincial or federal — to take some peact initiatives. In British Columbia, 14 municipalities either endorsed Vancouver’s two motions — urging that B.C. be ‘nuclear-weapons free, and that the federal government holda national referendum on cruise testing — OF passed similar resolutions. Another eight councils endorsed nuclear-weapons free B.C. only, while three cities favored the fed- eral referendum. Three cities — Toronto, Sarnia, Ont. and Kitimat — noted they had beet declared nuclear-weapons free, but declin to support Vancouver’s motions. Fouf other cities reported previous referendums on disarmament. _ Other cities declared their own forms of support for peace: Windsor, Ont., reported - it had endorsed a motion from the city oF Stoney Creek, Ont., supporting all federal disarmament initiatives. The city of York Ont., passed a similar motion and Gatt neau, Que., noted it had called on the Quebec government to hold a referendum on a world-wide nuclear freeze. i In a related development, council members also received copies of the declara- tion made by Hiroshima mayor Takesht! Araki on Hiroshima Day Aug. 6. The declaration, sent with a covering let ter to Mayor Mike Harcourt, noted Japa® was the only country which suffered nucleat bombing, and said the nation “shoul adhere fast to its constitutional principles 0 peace, faithfully uphold its three non- nuclear principles, and do its utmost 0 promote nuclear disarmament and the eas ing of East-West tension.” Vancouver representatives are set 10 attend the World Conference of Mayors fot Peace through Inter-city Solidarity in Hiro shima next August. Non-union bids queried The rising incidence of Vancouver city parks jobs going to non-union contractors — through a low-bid policy vigorously pursued by the right-wing dominated parks board — has drawn the concern of the city’s progressive officials. In the spotlight are three decisions relat- ing to construction at various community centres that have been taken by the parks board in the last three weeks. In each case, the board has favored a non-union contrac- tor policy. The question of one such contract — a $1,450,000 extension to the Dunbar Com- munity Centre awarded to the non-union firm, Falk Brothers — will come up a city council when it meets Sept. 11. Council voted 6-4 at the last meeting to hold off until then its decision on the con- tract, following a motion and plea for more information from Ald. Harry Rankin. “J want to know what the wages are that are being paid to the (construction) workers,” he said, noting there was a - $42,000 difference between Falk Brothers’ bid and that of the lowest-bid unionized firm, Westmount Construction. — “If that money was to be spread among working people in wages, our economy would be in much better shape,” said Rankin. Voting for Rankin’s deferral motion were fellow aldermen from the Committee of Progressive Electors Bruce Eriksen, Libby Davies and Bruce Yorke, Ald. Bill Yee and Mayor Mike Harcourt. Opposed were George Puil, May Brown, Marguerite Ford and Don Bellamy. COPE parks commissioner Pat Wilso® said later the Dunbar case is only one several involving non-union encroachments into parks-related construction. © Wilson said a $194,000 contract to build additions to the Kitsilano Fitness Centfé went to Key Construction Ventures, a nom union firm set up by the unionized com pany, Stratford-Hill. Stratford-Hill, listed as the sixth highest bidder on the Dunbar project, leases it equipment to Key Construction under an arrangement that has become known in the construction industry as “double-breasting- There were six bids below the unioniz offer in the Kitsilano case, with a $16,5 difference between the lowest bid and thé lowest bid from a unionized firm. Since thé contract involved expenditures beloW ~ $200,000, it did not have to go to city coum cil for ultimate approval, and passed pat board with Wilson and commissioner Andy Livingstone, a right-wing populist, votiné against. : City policy stipulates that contracts are ’ awarded to the lowest bidder, irrespective ° their workers’ organized status. COPE pol icy calls for union construction of all city facilities. IRIBUNE Editor — SEAN GRIFFIN Assistant Editor — DAN KEETON Fi Business & Circulation Manager — PAT O'CONNOR Graphics — ANGELA KENYON Published weekly at 2681 East Hastings Street - Vancouver, B C. VSK 125 : Phone (604) 251-1186 Subscription Rate. Canada — $14 one year, $8 six months Foreign —- $20 one year. Second class mail registration number 1560 os