B.C. Place plan hit at meeting About 500 people jammed a room at the Hotel Vancouver June 16 to show their con- cern over the controversial B.C. Place development which threatens to obliterate the north shore of False Creek with high-density de- velopment and office towers. Most of the briefs presented by citizens groups were op- posed to the provincial crown corporation's concept, which has been contrasted with the city of Vancouver's plan for more public housing and greater park space. There was only time to hear 27 of the 54 groups slated to speak, so another meeting was set for Wednesday night. Layoffs, closures tell real As of June 15, five hospitals in Vancouver have laid off 1,238 of their staff and closed 359 beds. Five more hospitals in the city have still to announce their layoffs and bed closures. The waiting list for surgery continues to grow. Yet health minister Jim Nielsen continues to claim that the quality of health care in the city and pro- vince has not been affected by his restraints. which brought about the cutbacks. In this he is all.too often seconded by weak-kneed hospital superintendents who substitute political fiction for medical science. You don’t need to be an expert to know that healthcare and medicare as a whole in this province is being eroded by government policies. You just need to be a human be- ing with common sense. It would be unfair to accuse. the present members of our provincial cabinet of either. On top of this Nielsen tells us that health care is a privilege. This is simply another way of saying that under our present system, - health care is a privilege only of the wealthy. That is exactly what this government wants to makeit. It is out to undermine medicare care and put all health services on a user-pay basis. When the issue of cuts in health Harry | Rankin “care ‘Came before city council on June 8 we had a report from the city’s health officer which con- tained the following rather astonishing statement: “Health care is being eroded, but not primarily or even significantly because of financial constraints upon hospitals. It is suffering because we devote so lit- tle attention to the promotion of health and to the prevention of disease.’’ The health officer also - advised city council not ‘‘to join in current uncritical equation of constraint with ‘the erosion of health care.’ ”’ It’s all well and good to ad- vocate much more attention to the promotion of health and the prevention of disease. That’s a long term proposition that cer- tainly deserves support. But we have an immediate problem — namely that health care is being eroded by cutbacks and that is what we have to deal with right now. If we followed the advice of TRIBUNE PHOTO—JOSHUA BERSON story our city health office, a man who comes to emergency with a bloody nose after being involved in a fight, would be told to go home and forget it, that his real problem is: that people haven’t learned to live together without fighting. And to expect or trust this present government, which is cutting health services right and left, to pay more attention to “health and to the prevention of disease’’ would be like asking Colonel Sanders to baby-sit your chickens. On the motion of COPE alder- man Bruce Yorke, city council went on record as opposed to the cutbacks and urged the provincial government to restore full service to all hospitals in Vancouver and throughout the province. I wonder if we shouldn’t go one step further and demand that premier Bennett dump his “health” minister too. It would probably be good for the premier’s political health if he were to do so. PEOPLE AND ISSUES mong the top money-raisers who did so much to ensure that our target of $82,000 was exceeded, there was one man who was not in- cluded in the list published last week. His name was Gary Harris, of Mission, and it will now be added to the ranks of the 500 Club — along’ with our apologies for the error and our thanks for his donation to the financial drive. + * * * * FS many years, his soft voice, with its trace of an English accent, and his always astute political comments were familiar to all of us on Tribune mailing day. And even when his move out to New West- minster made it imposible for him to join the rest of the volunteer crew, Bert Phillips still kept in touch. That was until last week. On June 18, just two days shy of what would have been his 89th birthday, he passed away quietly, unable to rally from the last stroke which had afflicted him some weeks earlier. Born in England in 1894, he came to this country while stilla boy and apprenticed as a coppersmith in the old Wallace Shipyards on False Creek. Sent for further training to England, he worked for several years in the huge Vickers Shipyard and also joined the socialist move- ment, beginning what was to be a lifelong commitment to socialism and the Communisty Party. He returned to Canada via the United States, and again went to work in the yards although the onset of the depression left him without a jobas it did thousands of others. And like many of them, he took part in the campaigns to fight back, joining the unemployed movement. As work opened up in the later ’30s, he went back to the yards, putting in many years at Burrard Dry Dock before retiring in 1959. He remained a member of the Communist Party until the time of his : death. Memorial services were to be held at the Boal Memorial Chapel in North Vancouver June 24. * * * * * or many years now, we have been getting a press package from the F USSR embassy in Ottawa which contains several hundreds pages of excerpts, in English translation, from various Soviet publications. But it is not the content of the package that is the object of our com- ments, but the condition in which the package comes through our door. : By the time the envelope arrives it looks as though it has been set upon by a whole squadron of attack dogs. Great chunks are torn out of the envelope and what little is left is held together by several metres of plastic strapping tape. Moreover, the package invariably comes at least three weeks after the date stamped on it by the Ottawa post office. Pre- sumably the delay is to give the Red squad time to pore through the reams and reams of material. The sameis true of most of the other Soviet publications which come through the mails. By the time we get them, they are often chewed, dog- eared — and several weeks old. A notable exception is the relatively po- litically innocuous News From Ukraine which, although it is only par- tially wrapped, arrives competely unscathed. We did protest the damage some time ago but always got the reply that the material was “‘received in damaged condition in Vancouver’ (although that was before the McDonald Commission revelations about widespread RCMP mail snooping). So we just endured the in- convenience, all the while wishing that the RCMP would get their own subscriptions so they wouldn’t have to hold ours up. Apparently, however, we’re not the only ones — and others have had similar problems with Soviet publications. ; Just last week, Tribune reader Dale Schnee called up, particularly in- censed because he had just received in the mail, not the journal to which he subscribes, Socialism: Theory and Practice, but an empty wrapper that had been thoroughly mutilated. Inside was a note from Canada Post, stating that the contents had been “‘ejected during handling”’ (a quaint way of putting it). It suggested that the sender should be aware of mailing procedures and added, ‘‘. . .specialists are available to counsel our customers . . . (to ensure) that all parcels are adequately and properly prepared to be handled by the highly sophisticated sorting equipment.”’ To that wecan only say: we’re sure the parcels can survive the mechanized equipment but we’re not sure about snooping fingers — and we’re not sure about sophistication either. : And Schnee adds a postscript: ‘It’s one thing if the RCMP have to read the stuff,’’ he says, ‘‘but the least they can do is send it along to me after they’ve finished.”’ Residents press for funnel Mona Morgan, treasurer,” Save Our Neighborhoods | Kommittee (SONK), writes: The elevated ALRT line pro- posed by the government to go through Cedar Cottage and adjoining neighborhoods would permanently destroy the area. At least 22 houses would be demolished, with devastating effects on families, some businesses would have to be relocated at high cost and an ugly dark structure would replace our bright, friendly | community. — ‘The residents have recognized the need for LRT but have also unanimously and repeatedly insisted. at many meetings that it go underground. If people in othef neighborhoods realize what the effects of the elevated line could do to a community, we hope they will begin to think about their own areas as the LRT expands. The alternative, an under- ground tunnel, has never | been considered by the Urban | Transit Authority (UTA) | which always responds to our demands with the statement, “If you want it underground, pay the extra $14 million.”’ Millions can readily be pro- cured for a convention centre, a stadium and B.C. Place (the concept of which is also not in accord with the wishes of Van- couver citizens). But the estimated two per!- cent additional money needed for a tunnel is not forthcoming to prevent the destruction of one of Vancouver’s oldest communities. Obviously, it is not only that governments, both federal and provincial, and the UTA want to exhibit the new Cana- dian technology of the ALRT. Why not test the new Cana- dian tunnelling technology; “‘super mole’’, developed by Lovat Tunnel Equipment Ltd.? The UTA did not even con- sult Lovat even though it can reduce tunnelling costs from the $5,000 per foot incurred using conventional equipment to $1,500 per foot or even less. Perhaps the UTA doesn’t want to jeopardize an ironclad deal? ; In spite of Jack Davis’ com- ment, ‘‘the tunnel is dead’’, the residents have not given up the fight. Save Our Neighborhoods Kommittee is sponsoring 4 residents’ meeting on Mon- day, June 28 at 7:30 p.m. at Trout Lake Community Cen- tre, 3350 Victoria Drive. Theré will be speakers, music and refreshments. SONK wants it sunk! J PACIFIC TRIBUNE—JUNE 25, 1982—Page 2