THE CORPORATION OF THR
CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM

B.R. Kirk DATE:
City Administrator

C. Felip, M.Arch., M.C.I.P.
Director of Planning

1485 Kebet Way and 1485 Coast Meridian

Development Variance Permit No. 9/87 and 11/87
Planning and Development Committee — February 13, 1991
RECOMMENDATION s

Ll. That the following resolution be rescinded:

“That City Council adept a resolution issuing a development variance
permit to Lot 4, D.L. 231, Section 19, Township 1, Block 6, N Range 1 east
Group 1, NWLD Plan No. 74069 relaxing requirements of the Zoning Bylaw
2240 Section, 1001, Subsection (4), Clause (g)(i) which requires that all
loading and truck parking areas be screened from view from the abutting
street."

That the following resolution be approved:

"That City Council adopt a resolution issuing a deveiopment variance
permit to Lot 2, District Lot 231, Group 1 and Section 19, Block & North
Range 1 east New Westminster District Plen 74069 (LOO01) relaxing

requirements of the Zoning Bylaw 2240 Section, 1001, Subsection (4),
Clause (g)(i) which requires that all loading and truck parking areas be
screened from view from the abutting street."

BACKGROUND :

On May 11, 1987 a development permit was approved for 1485 Kebet Way in
error. The correct address is 1485 Coast Meridian Road.

These properties are located in the Meridian Industrial Park. The
confusion arose because of the street names. The City’s solicitor advised the
following:

1. Prior to cancelling the development variance permit against Ict 4 and
registering the development variance permit against the correct Lot 2a
resolution of Council is required, as stated under Section 974 of the
Municipal Act.

The Solicitor's advice also states "if the original notice was not sent in
‘respect of Lot 2, the notice should be sent at this time (as section 980
is mandatory) in advance of the meeting at which Council will consider the
variance, so that the neighbours may make submigsions to Council at that
meeting.

Even though Council may receive submissions against the variance and even
though the property has been at variance with the Zoning Bylaw for some

time, it is ‘our’ opinion that Council may nonethelesg grant the variance
at this time."

“

PAGECAr1OS Felip, M.Arch., M.C.I.P.
; nner, Director of Planning