June 2nd, 1975 the bulletin board and that the Society had, in its letter, stated a preference for having the sign posted in the area of the Licensing Department. The letter was then ordered received and filed. From Mr. Roland J. Bouwman, Vice-President, General Counsel, and Secretary, British Columbia Telephone Company, May 22nd, 1975, replying to a letter from the City dated April 21st, 1975 to the Canadian Transport Commission (a copy of which was forwarded to the Telephone Company), opposing the rate increase proposed by the Telephone Company, and proposing that telephone rates be equalized throughout the Regional District; and advising that the proposal would generate substantial costs; would require use of scarce capital in priority to other projects; would benefit only a small minority of subscribers, and for the majority of subscribers in the GVRD would result in higher cost but no practical gain. Alderman Ranger stated he viewed the service provided by the Telephone Company in the same light as other utilities such as sewer, water, hydro, etc., and mentioned his objection to monies received by the Telephone Company in this Province going to all its subsidiary companies in the United States. Alderman Ranger pointed out that there is no additional charge to place a telephone call from Port Coquitlam tu the fringe area of the University Endowment Lands, and yet there is a charge to telephone to areas much closer, such as the municipalities of Surrey, Pitt Meadows, etc. Alderman Laking advised that the members of the Greater Vancouver Regional District supported the City's proposal with respect to telephone rates being equal throughout the Regional District, and had unanimously passed a motion to that effect; further, that the GVRD is now preparing a brief setting forth the proposal for submission to the Canadian Transport Commission. Alderman Keryluk stated he agreed with the comments made by Aldermen Ranger and Lakiug, and that while he was impressed with the author of the literature forwacded by the Telephone Company, he felt the City should be capable of processing an equally impressive rebuttal thereto. Alderman Ranger stated he felt the Mr. Bouwman's letter is of little or no value as he failed to point out the actual costs that would be irvolved in equalizing telephone rates throughout the Regional District, and Alderman Mabbett commented that the Government may have to take control of the Telephone Company if they continue to disregard requests for toll free calling from municipalities in the fringe areas. B.C. Tel re telephone rates-GVRD area, etc.