British Columbia M- B role seen in Tsitika dispute Continued from page 1 Vancouver Island gathered on the court- house lawn. Amid a sea of placards reading “Share the Forests,” “Held Hostage By Native Land Claims,” and “Hug a Logger, Mug a Hug- ger,” the crowd heard and applauded an hour’s worth of speeches critical of “preser- Vationists,” of government reluctance to set- tle land claims, and of the impracticality of halting logging until claims are heard. Sy Pederson, president of TWA-Canada Local 1-363 whose members are currently logging the Tsitika, called on the provincial government to accept its responsibility and deal with land claims. But, he added, “it is obvious that the negotiation of Native land claims is going to take quite a while. We cannot shut down the economy of this province while the negotia- tions are going on. We cannot lay off wood- workers while the negotiations are going on.” For the environmentalists, Natives and trade unionists involved in forging an al- liance at last month’s Tin-Wis conference in Port Alberni, the current stand-off over the Tsitika is seen as a set-back. Gourlay, a Tin-Wis participant, believes - MacMillan Bloedel is using the Tsitika to drive a wedge between these groups, thus preventing them from joining forces and turning their attention to questions of cor- porate control over forests and other resour- ces. “MacMillan Bloedel couldn’t care less about their 27 hectares in the Tsitika,” Gour- lay said after the rally. “They’re trying to split the alliance that’s been forming ‘be- tween environmentalists, workers and Na- tives. They want to make this the case that breaks the environmental movement in B.C.” After the courthouse rally was over, but before the crowd dispersed, Musgamagwa Tribal Council chairman Bob Joseph tried to salvage the situation with a spontaneous speech to the loggers. F “We don’t view you as our enemy,” he shouted from across the street where he stood with a small group of Natives cloaked in traditional red button blankets. “Tt is not - in our interest to have a work stoppage. It’s not our intent to threaten you or take away your jobs.” To date members of the Musgamagwa Tribal Council, of which the Tlowitsis- Mumtagila band is a member, have sup- ported and been present at the on-site protest mounted by the environmentalists. How- ever, the Natives have not actively disrupted logging. If the Tlowitsis-Mumtagila band loses its bid for an injunction and responds by joining the environmentalists in arrest-risking ac- tion in the Tsitika, the equation would be significantly altered. The Friends of the Tsitika are asking for cash donations as well as additional campers, waterproof structures, a cook shack, drivers and especially cameras. “The police behaviour has been less than exemplary,” says Friends member Laurie MacBride, referring to the handling of arres- tees. “Cameras could deter some of that.” The group is also encouraging people to phone provincial forests minister Claude Richmond and MacMillan Bloedel’s Van- couver office demanding a halt ot logging until the land claim is settled. Friends of the Tsitika can be reached in Nanaimo at 754-7492 and in Courtenay at 338-9242. Dre: Nov. 6. ssed in ceremonial blankets members of the Tlowitsis-Mumtagila First Nation demonstrate outside the Nanaimo court house Resolution of Gulf conflict seen as test for post cold war world The international crisis triggered by Traq’s annexation of Kuwait has provided a “laboratory for crisis resolution in the post cold war world,” two leading disarmament commentators told a peace forum in Van- couver Nov. 2. And Canadians should join others around the world in urging a resolution of the con- flict without resorting to military force, they agreed. But newspaper columnist Gwynne Dyer and Greenpeace researcher William Arkin disagreed sharply on whether a military ac- tion against Iraq could be contained and whether the United Nations could free itself from cold war patterns enough to be effec- tive. The forum, the opening event in a week- end-long peace conference organized by EAR, dramatized the heightened fears that many peace activists have felt because of the military build-up in the Persian Gulf. It also highlighted the search for new answers to international crises now that many of the cold war divisions have disappeared. Arkin, a researcher with Greenpeace, USA who has closely followed U.S. military strategy, told the packed theatre that if “by some miracle,” the world could resolve the Gulf conflict without resorting to the use of force, “it will give us a better idea of the dynamics” of crisis resolution in a changing world. But every day, the Pentagon and political leaders are preparing the way for a military strike against Iraq as the only solution, he warned. “The military will go for ‘precision bombing’ or a ’surgical strike’ — they will seek to make it antiseptic ... and make it seem that it’s far away,” he said. He noted that the Pentagon has already estimated that some 30,000 lives would be lost in a military strike against Iraq “but we know that the Pentagon has always been wrong by a factor of at least 2.” “Byery day we’re being asked to accept death, to accept the use of military force — to accept that it is right and necessary. “We have to fight that,” he declared, adding that the use of force would be “a ridiculous and impossible solution to the crisis.” sped GWYNNE DYER 1), WILLIAM ARKIN ... different views of military action in Perisan Gulf. : But Arkin told the meeting he was pes- simistic about avoiding a military option, noting that the U.S. was very much in con- trol of the multinational force in the Gulf and that the international institutions —includ- ing the United Nations — were themselves products of the cold war and reflected “a world which no longer exists.” “They must be changed ... to move into the future beyond Iraq and beyond the cold war,” he said. Dyer took issue with Arkin that the UN was a product of the cold war, arguing rather that the principle of international co-opera- tion and international law on which the UN was based “‘was sabotaged by the cold war.” With the removal of many of the cold war divisions and the old east-west strictures, he said, the UN can again be an effective inter- national agency for resolving crises. That has already been evidenced by the _unanimity achieved in the 10 resolutiéns on the Gulf crisis passed by the Security Coun- cil (Cuba and Yemen have abstained on many votes), he noted. Dyer did contend that it would be pos- sible to have a limited military action against Iraq without it escalating into a regional war — a point on which few peace activists agree. But he emphasized that the economic sanctions imposed by the UN must first be given a chance to work. “Military action should not be chosen as an option as long as there are any other options available to us,” he said. And there is hope that peaceful solutions can be found, he told the audience. Calling the current historical period a turning point, he cited three factors that could move the world more in the direction of peace. The first, he said, is the increasing awareness of the technological consequen- ces of war and the consequent awareness of the need to impose the intemational rule of law to prevent it. There is also a new awareness of the interpendence of the world, both economi- cally and ecologically, he noted. And the end of the cold war has made possible greater co-operation in international agencies. Arkin also cited a new mood among Can- adians particularly of rejection of militariza- tion of the country. “You essentially killed the 1987 defence white paper,” he told the audience, adding that the feeling among Canadians “could presage the end of Tory rule in Canada.” Pacific Tribune, November 12, 1990 «3