GLRA threat spurs demand The demand by many trade unionists at last year’s B.C. Feder- ation of Labor convention — for the establishment of a “common front” of all unions involved in negotiations in the critical 1986 bargaining year — has moved clo- ser to reality following the con- struction employers’ “declaration of war” against the Building Trades unions. The letters sent by Construction Labor Relations Association (CLRA) to all 16 Building Trades unions and the Building Trades Council demanding sweeping con- cessions and unilaterally declaring the current collective agreement at an end on its expiry date Apr. 30, has set the tone for what is expected to be a decisive round of bargaining this year, underscoring the importance of a co-ordinated bargaining campaign. “The construction employers’ game plan is to blackmail the - Building Trades workers into accepting a totally outrageous set of demands with the threat of agreement cancellation, elimina- tion of the union sector and a return to open-shop, freewheeling conditions in the industry tried elsewhere,” Building Trades Coun- cil president Roy Gautier charged in a statement Jan. 21. “The answer,” he emphasized, “lies in total unity among our trades people and the building of a common front of all labor organi- zations who are under the gun this year. “The Building Trades will take part in the promotion of such a front and will call on others to do likewise,” he said. The B.C. Federation of Labor Thursday gave its full backing to the Building Trades following a Meeting between federation and council officers. A statement issued by federation president Art Kube condemned the “belligerant announcement” by CLRA and declared: “Although not all Building Trades unions are affiliates of the federation, the JACK NICHOL Building Lrades will receive our complete support...Our federa- tion is committed to an active co- ordinating role in union bargaining programs and will bring maximum pressure to bear on employers who are demanding concessions from their employees.” Earlier, the Vancouver and Dis- trict Labor Council gave its full backing to the Building Trades Council and called on the council and the B.C. Fed “to develop together a strategy of co-ordinated bargaining that will be mutually beneficial.” The motion was endorsed at a packed meeting Jan. 21 where representatives from both the Building Trades and striking Pacific Wetsern Airlines unions warned of the employers’ stepped-up union- busting efforts. Machinists’ spokesman Ralph Webb told delegates that the dis- pute at PWA now into its tenth week, “‘is clearly about union bust- ing. “Management simply isn’t inter- ested in a settlement,” he warned, “their negotiators have made it clear that they want all of the con- cessions they’re demanding or nothing. “But it’s questionable whether we'd have a union left if we were to accept them,” he said. -. governments,” taxes, add another 9.6 cents. -VDLC protests price _ gouging at gas pumps Delegates to the Vancouver and District Labor Council gave voice to the rising consumer anger at the service station gas _ pump with a resolution Jan, 21 protesting the price of gas and =the “unconscionable tax gouging by both provincial and federal “We're being hosed every time we go to the pumps,” said - council president Doug Evans. “The price of oil is dropping all _ Over the world but our gas prices keep going up.” ~ Fishermen’s delegate John Radosevic noted that rising gas _ prices were making it harder for fishermen to make a living, with _ Some fishermen having to put as much as one-third of the gross — __ take from a trip into fuel costs. _ The motion was spurred by the latest federal tax increase of One cent a litre imposed Jan. 1 which brought federal taxes on a litre of regular gas, which costs 56.7 cents at the pump, up to 22.3 cents, Provincial taxes, including sales taxes and urban transit ut whereas consumers are faced with escalating taxes on the’ fuel they require to keep their cars running, the multinational oil companeis have had substantial tax relief from governments as a Tesult of the Western Accord signed between the three western Provinces and the Tory federal government last March. The accord was singled out by the U.S. investment house of ‘Salomon Brothers last August as the most important factor in il company profits bothi in is short and the long term. for unions’ common front ROY GAUTIER Carpenters delegate Colin Snell pointed to Webb’s comments about the PWA strike, adding: “that’s what its about in the con- struction industry.” The employers clearly have common aims,” he said, “and if it takes acommon front of unions to fight, then that’s what we have to do. “We've got to get the message to the government and to employers — if they intend to de-unionize us here as they have in Alberta, then there will be a major confrontation in B.C. this summer,” he said. Carpenter Marty Smith, whose motion was endorsed by the meet- ing, echoed Snell’s warnings, emphasizing that there was little difference in the objectives and the tactics of such employers as PWA, Canadian Tire, and Centennial Hotel or CLRA. “Employers seem to think they can have their way with us, and the only way to stop it is with a co- ordinated approach to bargain- ing,” he said. ““We’ve got to make sure that employers know that if they take on the Building Trades, the B.C. Government Employees Union or the International Woodworkers, they take on the whole trade union . movement.” Fishermen’s delegate Jack Nichol also cited PWA management’s tac- tics in the lengthy airline dispute, reminding delegates that “profits aren’t the issue — taking on unions is what it’s all about. “The employers are taking the opportunity in the current eco- nomic climate to roll back long established wages and conditions.” Trade unionists can’t be com- placent about that nor can they leave it for each union to go up against their employers individu- ally, he warned. “We've got to get the B.C. Fed to begin co-ordinated bargaining,” he said. Nichol, a vice-president of the federation, told the meeting that he would be pressing federation pres- ident Art Kube to call a conference of all unions in bargaining this year. Thousands of unionists in both the public and private sector are up for bargaining this year. In addi- tion to some 40,000 Building - Trades members, 55,000 workers in both the IWA and the two pulp unions face contract talks this year as do 35,000 BCGEU members, 10,000 Lower Mainland civic workers, 14,000 B.C. Nurses and 25,000 Hospital Employees. By BILL GILBEY REGINA — By a three-to- two majority decision Jan. 10, the Saskatchewan Labor Rela- tions Board issued a new and distorted interpretation of the province’s Trade Union Act which tears the guts out of the wages and conditions of 1,050 local Safeway supermarket work- ers operating. the company’s stores here. The board ruled that the pre- vious practice which prevented an employer from changing working conditions in a termi- nated agreement until a new contract was reached or a strike or lockout occurred, was wrong. Safeway had given notice to terminate the existing collective agreement before it expired last June. For five months the com- pany came to the bargaining table and refused to budge from its proposals for massive wage cuts and dilution of seniority and other benefits which would render meaningless 30-odd years of bargaining gains. At mid- November, the company claimed that negotiations with the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union were at a standstill. The company introduced new job classifications, and abolished existing call-in rules and seniority. The effect of the company’s action amounts to wage reductions ranging from $5 to $8 an hour. The action came on top of the lockout of 250 workers at McDonalds Consolidated Limi- ted (Safeway-owned food dis- tributors) over three months ago, a bitter dispute in which the company has refused govern- ment-proposed mediation and which has led to complaints being laid against the police of pro-company bias and activity. In reaction to this vicious union-busting ruling, the 66,000- member Saskatchewan Federa- tion of labor convened a meeting of representatives from all unions in the province, including the unaffiliated con- struction trades unions and the Saskatchewan Union of Nurses, on Jan. 16. The meeting was unanimous in recognizing the threat to every existing union agreement. There was no hesitation in adopting an 18-point campaign, | 3 POSTAL CODE Clip and. mail to: back bargaining rights battered | by the board’s action. =f Action includes a $20,000 | grant from the federation’s — emergency fund; an immediate appeal to all unions for dona- tions from their treasuries; in- plant collections; leaflet cam- paigns; the enlisting of support - from community organizations; and, if Safeway does not imme- diately respond to requests to retract their cutback actions and | resurne bargaining, a massive — boycott action. ; In addition to calling for thee ; resignation of Labor Relations } Board chairman Dennis oe the Saskatchewan Federation | of Labor met with Labor Minis- | f ter Grant Schmidt and urged the provincial government to” retroactively amend the loosely- worded section of the Act in order to negate the board’s ca sion. The SFL’s emergency meet- ing set up a steering committee of seven members, four federa- tion officers plus one from the of Nurses and one each from the™ North and South Saskatchewan Building Trades Councils. : The construction trades have been suffering for several years” from the effects of the compan- ies being allowed to get away with setting up “spin-off” non- union companies to evade con- | tract rates and conditions. | Saskatchewan Nurses have been | engaged for months in a public campaign to expose the deterio- | ration in patient care and stress _ on nurses caused by gross understaffing in Saskatchewan | hospitals. : Less than a week since the © all-union emergency meeting called by the SFL, action already taken and planned holds the promise of a fight-— back campaign that employers and right-wing politicians in the province will not soon forget. ‘Offer ends this issue