eI LT Dit tite oS ALBERTA ELECTIONS Socred aligned with big business _ By KATE FOUNTAIN ; —EDMONTON IRE than 300,000 voters will go to the polls. on August 17 to elect 57 members of the Alberta legislature. By nomination day, August 7, it is anticipated that over 150 candidates will be lined up te file their papers. The hats al- ready in the ring bear every kind of band—Social Credit, Liberals, Independent (Tories), LPP, CCF, and one Independent Social Credit. _ Announcing the ‘election, Premier Manning Promised electors a program “to ensure the con tinuation of Alberta’s outstanding progress and to enable our people to take full advantage of the unusual opportunities which the next few years will hold in store. It has become obvious,” he said, “that until the people themselves again Tenew their mandate . . . the constructive efforts of the government . .. will be continuously dis- torted and impeded by minority political factions manoedvering for political advantage. .. . This. is a defensive statement, which is any- thing but a favorable position from which to Start out to win an-election. The promise of ecient opportunities” in the next few years will arouse little optimism among workers and farm- ers. Faced with rising costs of production on the farm, rising prices of consumer goods, the Steady increase in unemployment, they will re- ceive Manning’s appeal to renew their mandate in Social Credit very critically. After 12 years of its administration the People see much more clearly now just what Social Credit represents. “° They see that de- Spite some good reform measures in its early heyday, Social Credit has gradually charted its Course in the same direction as the “orthodox” - and. “respectable” old line parties. With its Courting of big business interests, Social Credit has become less and less concerned with the needs of the common people of Alberta, whose demands for broader reform measures have been ignored, ‘ The bonds of political matrimony between the Social Credit government and free enterprise ave been irrevocably sealed. Gifts have been exchanged in the best of capitalist “good form.” y denouncing the farmers’ non-delivery strike two years ago the government took harsh action that no farmer: is likely to forget on election day. And at the last session of the legislature tee enterprise received another handsome gift in Bill, 91, a piece of anti-labor legislation de- Signed only to hobble the workers and their trade unions, Workers to define ‘his stand towards this un- €mocratic piece of legislation that was foisted upon the people over province-wide opposition. What is the remedy to stop the sell-out of Alberta’s progressive heritage to big business? ‘There is only one. The people who want to see this province ge ahead economically and socially, for the benefit of alt, and not selfishly exploited Y a minority group of profit seekers, must unite their voices and speak with one voice on election day. Av great many of ‘these people are to be found in ‘and around the Social Credit movement itself. They must not be overlooked or mis- judged because of the betrayals of their leaders. hey ‘still want to go forward. A great ey More are to be found in around the LPP and the CCF, Hundreds of others will be voting for the first time ; they, too. are looking for progressive ‘ leadership. All of these represent a vast major- ity. The majority must be enabled. to win _ through unity at the polls. se PACIFIC TRIBUNE—JULY 28, 1948—PAGE 9 cpap The fight against Bill 91 is now being — Carried into the election campaign and every © ' Prospective MLA is being challenged by the fj | f : iy >= ill = ee Sen 7 at aan i LE] * Ku t ee eerie < 14 were | Pea ~ cal Price of | Marshall aid . LONDON TY percent of the workers at Gallaher Tobacco Company in Belfast have been fired following Brit- ain’s acceptance of U.S. trade agreements which pre- vent British purchase of non-American tobacco. With American tobacco one of the big export items under the Marshall plan, workers fear further widespread dismissals at Gallaher’s and elsewhere. REAL ISSUES OBSCURED W hat is Ottawa’s policy on Berlin? W 21 is the real story of Berlin which is being concealed from the people of Can- ada? What is Ottawa’s policy on Berlin? ‘The issue of Berlin cannot be divorced from the general question of Germany. On June 24 the toreign ministers of the USSR, Albania, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, Hungary, Poland and Romania adopted in Warsaw a dec- laration which has been buried by the same daily press that is headlining the notes sent to the USSR by the U.S., Britain and France in a way calculated to whip up another-war scare. The Warsaw conference proposed: : —Implementation of the measures ensuring the fin- al demilitarization of Germany by agreement among the Four Powegs. gu ; —Control for a definite period by the Four Powers - of Ruhr heavy industry with a view toa developing the peace potential of the Ruhr and preventing re- establishment of the war potential of Germany. —Establishment by agreement among the govern- ments of the USSR, U.S., France and Britain of a provisional, democratic, peace-loving government for the whole of Germany, composed of representatives of the democratic parties of Germany, for the pur- pose of creating a guarantee against the repetition of German aggression. —Conclusion of a peace treaty with Germany, in accordance with Potsdam decisions, so that occupa- ton troops of all the powers should be withdrawn from Germany within one year after conclusion of the peace treaty. : '—Elaboration; of measures for fulfilment by Ger- many of her reparations obligations towards the states whick suffered from Nazi aggression. 4 & HE declaration was in reply to the communique 7 of a secret conference of the three powers ‘in London on June7 when Britain, France and the U.S. arbitrarily changed the frontiers of Germany in violation of the Potsdam agree- ment and set up a Western German state. At the London® conference a number of steps were taken which have the aim of isolating Eastern from Western Germany economically and politically. Yet the Potsdam agreement says specifically that no decisions shall be taken respecting the future of Germany without the joint participation of Four Powers, U.S., USSR, France and Britain. wie - This action by the Western powers virtually liquidated quadripartite control of Germany. And inevitably, Berlin, which lies in the Soviet zone but is itself divided into four zones ad- ministered by the Four Powers, has become the focal point of the differences created by vio- lation of the Potsdam agreement. The Western powers, whom Canada fully supports, are bent upon maintaining their hold in Berlin, not in order to assist the unity of the Germany state on a democratic foundation, but as a means of furthering their policy of making western Germany a base of future war operations against eastern Europe. | To this end they insist upon retaining in Berlin all the rights they have repudiated else- where, a stand the USSR and the eastern Euro- pean democracies counter with their demand for settlement of the whole German problem ‘of which Berlin is the expression.’ against the profiteers to the public. LABOR FOCUS The conventions and falling wages By BRUCE MICKLEBURGH ABOR will be meeting in convention this fall to chart its course against a background of steadity falling real wages. The Trades and Labor Congress meets in Victoria October 11. The Canadian Congress of Labor meets the same day in Toronto. The IWA International Board has chosen the same day for an international convention tn Portland. Preceeding all these will be the B.C, Federation of Labor convention September 4 in Vancouver. Even the government has to admit that real wages are taking a beating. The Dominion Bu- reau of Statistics says the weekly wage in nine leading industries averaged $39.69 as of May 1, 1948. That’s an increase of 10.4 percent over last year’s figure of $35.95. It looks good tiil you realize the profiteers have more than eaten up the gain. ; . During the same period, from May 1, 1947 to May 1, 1948. the cost of living index hopped from i33.1 to 153.3, an increase of 15.2 percent. Balance wages against prices and you get a five percent drop in real wages. Labor’s figures show an even greater drop. . This points up the need for labor to secure heavy wage gains to hang on to what’s left of living standards, let alone raise them. And this in turn throws into sharp relief the urgency of action on the part of hundreds of thousands of organized workers, to overcome the fatal in- fluence of the right wing trade union bureau- cracy, whose methods of obstruction are legion. This year sees an absence of coordination on the wage front with key unions voluntarily or by force of circumstance working out separate settlements. There is no major drive to organ- ize the hundreds of thousands of unorganized. There is urgent need for labor to carry its case I : Defensive tactics are being advocated by the right wing at a time when conditions were never better for a strong labor offensive. The bureaucrats try to hide their responsibility by red-baiting but the fact is that it’s internal weaknesses that are holding back labor. Every worker on the job has an unanswer- able argument for those who are trying to juotify evasion of the wage fight—his pay cheque buys less from week to week. This is the test of labor statesmanship. And it’s from down be- low, where the facts of life are very real, that the movement has to come to rouse Canada’s million-strong unions.. : Labor’s counter-offensive has to come from the job to the local and from the local to the conventions. Only the strongest membership action can rescue labor from the passive rotting and inner sabotage that characterizes some un. ions, and defend the militant unions that are holding the front line. Such membership action will have to include action against the right- wing leaders. There are signs of such action. The bi steel plants are dissatisfied with Millard’s 11- cent settlement and with red-baiting in the _ union. Workers in the GM Oshawa plant are — moving to head off advocates of the phony escal- ator, settlement. In Vancouver’s building trades there is mountiyg dissatisfaction with those plumping for an escalator clause that would actually allow the boss to cut wages under cer- tain conditions, The right-wing International President Jas. E. Fadling of the IWA is under fire ‘from at least three directions. The B.C. District Coun- cil of the IWA has “responded to demands from | the camps and mills and has demanded Fad-— ling’s resignation to his face. The same day the district council in Washington’s “northern em- pire” laid down the same demand before his lieutenants. Simultaneously elections being held in southern Oregon’s District Six are register- ing a repudiation of the Trotskyite former Inter- national Secretary E. Benedict who went in there to do a job for Fadling. These — i i are signs that will help union mem- bers to realize the possibilities for strengthen- ing their position at the coming labor conventions. But that voice can be heard, ttarting now, in a flood of resolutions from down below, where the shrinking pay cheque isn’t to be brushed aside. There’s no union that can’t start on this job now.