TERRY PETTUS IN compiling a roster of the Northwest’s sawdust aristocra- cy, you start with a name that puzzled many a reporter and copy editor 15 years ago when the family burst into national promi- nence as the victim of a $200,000 kidnapping. “How the hell do you spell it?” This was always the first question from the out of town reporters who invaded Tacoma to cover the smatch of nine-year-old George Weyerhaeuser, member of one of the nation’s wealthiest but least known families. In newspaper offices throughout . the country, there was a. frantic and futile search of morgues and libraries for scraps of information about a clan which dominates the lumber industry of the U.S. ~ Edi- tors found that James W. Gerard, former ambassador to Germany, wasn’t kidding when he wrote in 1930 that though the Weyerhaeu- sers are among the 64 men who “rule the United States,” there is a “dearth of published information regarding the annals of that fa- mily.” At the time of the kidnapping the “published information” was confined principally to a 1934 issue of the swank, one-buck a copy. ‘business magazine, Fortune. It, did a gushy article on the first Frederick Weyerhaeuser, who came to the U.S. from Germany in 1852. It billed him as “the brewer’s apprentice who made More millions from the woods than any other man and founded a family which is so retiring that few people east of the Twin Cities have ever heard of the Weyer- haeusers (pronounced Warehou- Ser), and built a business struc- ture unique in the U.S, and lar- Sest in its industry.” The Weyerhaeusers are so “re- tiring”, Fortune said, that as a Consequence “not very many of the Weyerhaeuser companies even bear their name.” That was more the case in 1934 than today, when the family is coming out from behind a maze of corporate whis- kers, Such outfits as Willapa Harbor and White River lumber compa- nies now bear the name Weyer- The family is openly haeuser, given taking over the Pacific Coast Dir- ector Line, which has long served as an operating company for the Weyerhaeuser-owned vessels in the inter-coasta] trade. And the Weyerhaeusers are making a bid for even tighter control of the in- dustry by multiple producing units. These ultra-modern plants com- bine sawmills, plywood, pulp and paper and by-product manufac- ture in one operation. Thanks to modern technology, the Weyer- haeusers have been able to go the meat packers one better. The well-worn joke about using every- thing about the pig but the squeal Timbe wolf has been realized in lumber, Saw-. dust goes into presto-logs, while all other “waste” finds utilization in wall board manufacture and other saleable products. These huge multiple operations get their raw material from the trees on the 2,201,115 acres owned openly by the Weyerhaeuser cor- poration and its known subsidi- aries. It does not include what is owned by individual members of the family, their close business associates, or the “control” exer- cised through a myriad of inter- locking directorships in banks, railroads, chemical and other in- dustries. ; e In the early nineties, Weyer- haeuser was a rich and powerful man. His mansion in St. Paul, Minn., adjoined that of James J. Hill, head of the Northern Pacific railroad, Weyerhaeuser’s close friend and business associate. It was through Hill that the Weyer- haeusers made their way west- ward — by private railway car. And the family “homesteaded”, so to speak, on 900,000 acres of the finest timber land in Western Washington. Through Hill the SS ‘land grant railroads” were added to “homesteaders” who could make such swaps. Hill lost no time in making trades which were to be so profitable for Northern Paci- fic and his pal, Weyerhaeuser. This was not the only timber deal between Hil] and Weyerhaeu- ser. By 1911 the U.S. Commissio- ner of Corporations reported that the Weyerhaeusers owned 1,945,- 000 acres of land, “four-fifths of which were obtained from the Northern Pacific.” It is not surprising that at the time of his death, old Frederick was a director of both Northern Pacific and Great Northern Rail- roads. His fortune was estimated at $300,000,000, but this was ad- mittedly a guess, (The family has always been sensitive on the question of his ac- tual wealth and holdings. At the time of the kidnapping, inspired stories were planied in the news- papers to the effect that the family was down to its lasi sack of saw- dust, and would have plenty of trouble raising the $200,000 ran- som. The paper for which I was working at the time arranged an interview with the young victim's father, John Phillip Weyerhaeuser Jr. . Before I wrote the story, the managing editor asked hopefully, “Did you notice how frayed his coat sleeves were?’ I hadn't.) Today, grandsons of old Freder- ick call the tune for the North- west’s basic industry. How impor- tant is lumber, for example, to the economy of Washington state? The U.S. Census of Manufacturers for 1947 (the last year for which > figures are available) reported 911 lumber and processing plants, ex- their logs at monopoly-fixed prices from their gigantic “competitors” such as Weyerhaeuser, Crown-Zel- lerbach, St. Regis and Rayonier. As far as the administration of Washington’s Governor Arthur B. Langlie is concerned, Weyer- haeuser does not even pretend to operate behind the scenes. The roster of key “cabinet” posts un- der Langlie reads like a Weyer- haeuser executive pay roll, Par- ticular attention is paid to such departments as labor and indus- tries, employment security and social security. Heading the latter is the notor- ious Roderic Olzendam, former Weyerhaeuser public relations di- rector who is spearheading the attack to wipe out all social legis- lation dating back to 1911. And as this is written, Governor Lang- lie is continuing his fight to re- place the present adjutant general of the National Guard with Col. Walter DeLong, a Weyerhaeuser executive. Labor remembers the strike-breaking part played. dur- ing the 1935 lumber strike by the guard under the then Clarence D. Martin, millionaire flour miller and pal of the Weyerhaeusers. As befits its position on top of the heap, Weyerhaeuser is playing the key employer rol] in present negotiations. While the demands differ in details, both the CIO International Woodworkers of America and the AFL Lumber and Sawmill Workers are out for health and welfare funds, a pen- sion, paid holidays and (in some cases) wage increases equivalent to an average of 10 cents an hour. Throughout the Pacific Northwest, both in Canada and the U.S., big struggles for wage increases are shaping up in the lumber industry, 40,000 workers are affected in the U.S., another 40,000 in B.C. Weyerhaeusers obtained it from the Northern Pacific for $6 an acre. The purchase price, $5,400,000, ed a clear profit to Nor- gal The timber didn't cost the railroad & dime. Nor was it part of the original land grant Northern Pacific by Con- uring railroad construction days. Much of the original land grant acres was then worthless for farm or lumbering. gress d Prior to 1897, there was much agitation to create federal “forest reserves” and allow the poor, struggling homesteaders to trade poor and mountainous acres for better land. But when Congress passed the Jaw in 1897, the words cept furniture. They employed 45,000 workers, or 35 percent of all employes engaged in manufac- ture. Oregon is even more dependent on lumber. The lumber workers and union officials now engaged in negotiations should ponder the implications of the U.S, Census report, Which says that in 1947 these 911 plants paid out in sala- ries and executives’ wages a total of $135,000,000 and that “their work added $279,500,000 to the market value of the goods they processed.” It is unlikely that later figures will show 911 plants. “Log buy- ing” mills have folded by the score since the war. They cannot stay in business when forced to buy With unity and determination, the unions can win. The lumber corporations will not say they can- not afford to pay. Published pro- fit figures belie any such excuse. With a great show of “indepen- dence”, Weyerhaeuser has with- drawn from joint negotiations. In reality, however, it is making a heat end run for the employer team, In adopting a lone wolf role, the powerful corporation dangled the bait of a “$100 a month pension” which it blandly says will cost ten cents an hour. But examination revealed many a knot in the Weyerhaeuser pen- sion log. First, the company de- manded that acceptance would mean continuing present contracts for another year with no benefits. Secondly, the “pension” plan’ would be administered solely by the corporation. Its officers would say who was to get a pension and how much. The union could not even use grievance machinery on behalf of any member discrimin- ated against. The IWA asked and received from Weyerhaeuser a breakdown of its 10,000 employes on the basis of age and seniority. Statisticians went to work and came up with the report that even if the cor- poration was “liberal” and did not take advantage of its arbitrary position, the plan would not cost more than 1% cents an hour. Weyerhaeuser’s 1949 net profit (after taxes and all the other de- ductions big business uses to hide its real earnings) is announced as being $24,633,016, or about $2500 per employee. At 14% cents an hour the “pension” plan would cost about $30 a year per worker. Stack this up against the 10 cent an hour package demand of the unions, and you have the kind of deal that would warm the heart of old Frederick. But the real danger remains that Weyerhaeu- ser will be successful in using its “pension plan” to create division among union leadership and to spread confusion among the rank and file. The Weverhaeusers have had three generations of experience in writing “contracts”. The foun- der of the family, according to one of scores of stories, was no slouch at that game. Oldtimers relate that in the early days in Wisconsin, old Fred- erick, then a young and ambiti- ous man, (negotiated with the owner of some timber land for “about one acre”. Weyerhaeuser -wrote the contract, which stipu- lated a certain sum for the right to cut “around an acre of land”. The unsuspecting owner signed, and Weyerhaeuser put his loggers to work and for months they en- ergetically cut “around” a _ cer- tain acre of standing timber. Today, things aren’t quite so simple. The people see the tim- ber resources of the Northwest gutted and wasted, and are not reassuréd by glib Weyerhaeuser advertisements stating that “tim- ber is a crop” and that meagre reforestation projects are “tree farms”, And the lumber workers in in- creasing numbers are refusing to take the pension wooden nickel as full payment for their 10-cent an hour demand. Terry Pettus, formerly editor of the defunct Washington New Dealer, is now Northwest editor of the San Francisco Daily Peo- ple’s World, PACIFIC TRIBUNE — APRIL 7, 1950 — PAGE 6