' THOMPSON & McCONNELL

v 15200 TuUMIET AVENUR
. BARRISTERS AND SOLICITORS SOX 100, wre HOCK, €
TELEPHONE: B3t-t88s

.

ag wren € *.en0en 4 F. cance
. . ev oreay M, wERD “~wOMAs ©.0 stamate 400 Camarz aracer,
(epauan €.u conmewoos VANCOUVE® 8, ec.
Angest lst, 1573 TELEPRONE. D»4-BL0>
Ora-aee
REPLY TO INE ATTENTION OF

Rh. K. Thonoson
White Rock Office

The Corporation of the city
ef Port Coquitlan,

2272 McAllister Avenue,

PORT COQUITLAN, B.C.

Measrs. Thoapson & HeConnell, . Attention: Mr. R.A. Freeman,
Barristers & Solicttore, : City Clerk
P.0. Sox 100, vaty Clerk August 3, 1973

Waite Sock, B. C.

Dear Sir:

Attention; itr. AK. Thoupsen

We have your letter of au ust Ist, 1973, wit
eat tr: | to non-conforming buildings wit : ‘and Bi} eee ere

hin the 2%] and 24-2 zones.
Your understanding of the situati

fi0n, as set forth i
the second Paragranh of vour ietter, is qu _ ° "

The Zoning By-lew of this City, as presently worded, docs not perait
the uses of “One-Paaily Restidential” or ‘Two-Panily Residential” 19 the Ki-1

. ite cerrect. The
and Ri~2 zones, viich aro the City’s “Ayartaont Residential" cones. On July Municipal Act does not permit additions to be made to non-
9th, 1973 our Council adopted a repore frow the Building & Protection Comnittes conforming buildings, and in our opinion, the only way that
of the City recomeniiug chat although cw single fanily dwellinge in tha additions could be made to buildings in this zone is to amend
Apartuezt acuidential zones should contiave to be prohibited, additions cade the by-law so that One~famiiy and two-family residential uses
in « conforzing nasner to einzie fonily and duplex dwelliogs loceted in cha would be a permitted use an

within the R1-) and RY-2 zones. In
the meantime, the only alto G23 to non-conforming

Apartment Kesicsatial zones sioulu be peraicted.

orations or cnan
uses that can be made are those that fall

withi 2, >
at is our understanding thac this woull be very difficult, Lf not the Municipal Act. tthin Secticn nee of
iepoesivle, to do ag our underctaiciny: of the situation is that the omer of Cee)
a builling used for a non-conferning purpose law recourse to the Soard of Yours truly,
Variance asl a Zoning sy-lav cannot persit the upcradins of a buiiding used

for any particular purpose while prohibiting new buildings to be built for that
sane purpose. .

THOMPSON & Mec

Per: Fi Abe
Will you please confirm that our understaoding in tufs respect is Ugly;
covrect or, alternatively, will you prepsre the Recessary ancnding by-law for A. KThomeson
consideration by our Council and'advancenent to Public Hearing.

AKT: vad
Yours vary: truig;s —~, .
Wiens! Signed Py

}
nrita we)

R. A. Freenan,
City Clark.

Watery uaeset mur ane

MITER Sent ip eee eee

i
+
ot

ev tan