EDITORIAL ‘We wuz misquoted’ ad the Socreds been the government of B.C, in. 1867, there is every likelihood there would have been no British Columbia today, | That does not mean that there were no politicians or others --of a like mentality in B,C. at the time of Confederation, or up until British Columbia’s entry in 1871. There were, lots of them — Yankee annexationists and Canadian “Copperheads” all hell-bent on making B.C, a part of Washington, U.S.A. Thanks to Canadian patriots of that day, andin B.C. especiall to the Cariboo miners, who sawa higher destiny for Canada than being the victim of the treasonable connivings and schemings of the U,S, annexationists and their B.C. “boy scouts”, the latter were decisively crushed. Nine decades later however, under a Social Credit regime of sellout, double-cross and give-away, in which the alienation of 3,C.’s rich natural resources to U.S, monopoly has been, and still isSocredia’s most outstanding “achievement”, the “annexa- tionist” mentality still finds a fertile soil. It is therefore no accident that during the past period of time, in response to numerous and varied U,S, interests, who still look covetously Northwards through their “continental” bi-focals, that leading Socred ministers, inone form or another, should repeatedly echo that sentiment, Nor does the old excuse that “I was misquoted” free them from the people’s protest and indignation, Socred trade minister Loffmark has, on more than one occasion, chattered about how much more “prosperous” we in B.C. would be, if we were part of the U.S.A. Socred attorney-general Bonner, probably unaware of the historical role the constituency he misrepresents in the inde- pendence struggle of a century ago, never tires in harping about a “customs union” with the U.S, — the-open door for a complete U.S, take-over of B.C. And just a few days ago Socred Minister of Recreation and Conservation K, Kiernan gave his opinion that B,C. * would be better off outside of Confederation .., that Canada needs us more than we need Canada”, Serving as an “incentive” to climb onto. the Socred “separatist” band-wagon, a UBC economist says that if we-in B.C, cut ourselves loose from the “high-cost manufacturers of Eastern Canada ... and the boundaries were scrapped” between ourselves and Washington, USA, our per capita income “would jump by 25-percent”, What we’d have to give in return for that “boost” the UBC economist was careful not to say. . Entirely aside from its outward manifestations, Quebec “separatism” is based on a “raw deal” under Confederation, Socred “separatism” with its Socred promoters, is based on a U.S, “big deal” — a rich province for a fistful of Yankee dollars — and an end to Confederation, GREENWELL SAYS: ‘Take over CPR lands’ Commenting on an announce- ment from the CPR that it will seek co-operation of Mayor Tom Campbell to build $85 million worth of development on three of its vacant city properties, former school board candidate Don Greenwell said this week: “The CPR property was given to them to build a railway from Port Moody to Vancouver, and if its not going to be used for that purpose should be returned to the people, The city should ex- propriate the 161-acre Langara Golf Course based on its assess= ed value, that is its true value plus 10 per cent for inconven- ience.” Greenwell also opposes high rise apartments on the fringes of Langara and said what is left of old Shaughnessy should be ex- propriated, Socreds ‘artful dodgers on housing, says Rush Members of the Socred gov- ernment have earned for them- selves the title of “artful dodgers” for the way they have attempted this past week to justify the lack of action from Victoria on hous- ing, said Communist Party spokesman Maurice Rush on a CKWX_ radio’ broadcast last Sunday, a) The chief dodge they resort to is to put the blame on Ottawa, he said, adding that undoubtedly Ottawa shares a great deal of the blame with its tight money policy and lack of federal pro- grams, Rush said Ottawa could take one billion dollars out of its present arms budget “which is being wasted anyway~because it fails to provide any defence in this nuclear-missile age” — and UNIONISTS RELEASED. Paddy Neale, Vancouver Labor Council secretary, and Tom Clarke, Vancouver IWA local vice-president, were released Wednesday after serving most of their six month sentences. They were imprisoned in the anti-inj Bi; from a well-earned va- cation in Mexico, Harold Pritchett handed us a clipping from the only English-language newspaper in Mexico, “Here’s something good for your column.” It is, and just one of those kind of literary bon mots which shouldn’t be mutilated by some- one trying to re-write it or boil it down, It’s about an Am- erican GI in Vietnam, “Excuse me, Captain,” said Private Oliver Drab 378-18- 4454, looking up from the letter he was writing. “Do you say ‘Dear Mr. Ho’ or ‘Dear Mr, Minh?” “Who are you writing to now Drab?” said Captain Buck Ace suspiciously. “Your Congress- man again?” “Oh no sir, Mr, Ho Chi Minh, I want to ask him to give up,” “Surrender? That’s the spirit soldier,” said the Captain, clap- ping Private Drab on the back, “You tell him ne can’t fick the U.S. Army.” “That’s right, sir. Of course, we can’t seem to lick himeither, But the way I figure, somebody’s got to give up sooner or later. And I want to point out that it ought to be him.” “Hmmmm,” said Captain Ace hesitantly, “I guess that’s all right. What’s your letter say?” «Pll read it to you sir,” said Private Drab eagerly, “I put a lot of thought in it, “Dear Mr. Ho or Mr, Minh: Please give up, I read the other day where you said you don’t like to see American soldiers get killed. I feel very muchthe same way. “The reason you ought to give up instead of us Mr, Ho, is that whoever gives up is going tolose face, And we’ve got more face to lose than you got, “How would it look, Mr. Minh, a tiny little country like yours licking a great big country like us? It sure wouldn’t set well in our history books. And don’t forget, you’ve always got Dien Bien Phu to talk about. a few, lose a few, I say. “Besides, we lose and what’ve you got? Nothing. But you lose and you get a good deal, Look at it this way, you agree to pull out the troops you say you don’t have here and you announce you’ve lost. I can’t tell you how glad we Americans would be to have the war over, You’d bea national hero, «“There’s nothing we love more than a loser. There’s nobody more generous in victory thanus, Look at Germany, Lookat Japan, You give up and you’ll make all your fine folks up there rich, “Why, history shows we’llhave your war-torn country rebuilt in no time, no matter how many billions it costs us, and glad to do it too, .Jew bridges, new high- ways, new oil depots and some nice new fighters to replace those ones we shot down. Frankly, I don’t see how you can afford not to lose. “But mainly I figure you can do it because you don’t have to run for re-election in ’68 and you ction fight arising out of the Lenkurt dispute. Win ~ don’t have a swarm of Repub- licans just waiting to cry Sellout and, . .” «Damn it Drab,” thundered the Captain, snatching the letter and tearing it up. “You’re the only man I know who could demand the enemy surrender and make it sound like treason.” * OK OK «{ don’t see it’ll do any good at all,” Private Drab said later to his friend Corporal Partz, as he morosely began another let- ter. “What won’t?” asked Corporal Partz, «Well, the Captain said I can’t write the enemy at all, But I don’t think somehow this is going use it to launch a nation-W housing program, Such 4 mt gram would break the pack the housing crisis and Wy correspond more to the rel needs of the Canadian peopl ‘But the failure of Ottawad® not justify the inaction of Socred government,” said Rl pointing to the fact that ma millions of dollars are avail now to the provincial govel) ment under the National Hou Act which is not being takel™) vantage of, = He said there are half 2d) major housing projects which blueprints have been 44. up by Vancouver waiting for a proval from Victoria, but $°™ without avail. Outlining what the Commute Party proposes, Rush said: “The Communist Party hash forward a realistic progral 4 solve the housing crisis. It® ment to give top priorit! crash program to provide cent housing for our citiZ™ tim, We believe that such a prog!” p would be the best Centellah project that Canada could une! take in this our Centennial yeu “Such a program must incl! the assignment of large Fedet funds for a national low-re housing program along will cutting of the interest rate on loans to five percent for pe wishing to build their own hom It must include immediate 2% by Victoria to’set una Provin Housing Authority ‘to plam develop an adequate housingP gram, 3 ples “While this is being done WE toria should at once approv® present plans and take fuller? vantage of federal funds available for housing, Vanco” City Council should without d initiate a low-rental housin#P gram of 2,000 units a yeal the next ten years.” j to help any, Let’s see, ‘Dea! ™ Johnson: please give up’+ * “yeah,” agreed Corre Partz, spitting thoughtfully, 4M first one sounded more like” ft eg ie 4 The foregoing GI dialogu® | author Art Hoppe indicates?” all else that editors in Old ico, as elsewhere, are not confirmed addicts of a penta promoted “LSD siesta” on nam, . re ] Much of U.S. Foreign S° Jpr, tary Dean Rusk’s “explanatiO’ §. “during recent days on “peace” policies in Vietnal™ (aj a close parallel with P! J Drab’s letter to Dear Ml And we’re willing to 10S McNamara-Rusk-LBJ “fac® © 9, ae a ra Y Editor—TOM McEWEN Vancouver 4, B.C.;Phone 685-5288. Subscription Rates: Canada, $5.00 one year; $2.75 for six m C| ‘eee, , Pacific Tribune West Coast edition, Canadian Tribone. Associate Editor—MAURICE RUSH Published weekly at Ford Bldg., Mezzanine No. 3, 193 E. Hasting: s Sty onths North and South America and Commonwealth countries, $6.00 ane yea: a : other countries, $7.00 one year. Authorized as second class mail by the P Office Department, Ottawa, and for payment of postage in cash. : February 17, 1967—PACIFIC TRIBUNE—Pa Coe