~ Australian labor against the war in Vietnam With 4,500 men in Vietnam, the majority conscripts, Australian opposition to the war is taking on mass proportions. This week Phyl- lis Clarke interviewed for the Tribune Mavis Robertson, mem- ber of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Australia on the position of the trade unions and the Labor Party in the anti- war movement. Mrs. Robertson has been visiting Canada for the last week. What bas been the reaction to conscripts going to Vietnam? This has been the thing’ that has been a turning point in the ~ anti-Vietnam movement. I think it’s important to understand that there have been Australians in Wetnam for quite a long time. The foreign policy that has led to the conscripts going into Vietnam has existed for more than a decade of which the ANZUS and SEATO treaties were part of the preparation. Even when the volunteer troops went in the first place there wasn’t all that much re- action. Then conscription was introduced and there was a great furor although at that time the government wouldn't say that the conscripts were going to Vietnam. They merely said that _ the conscripts would be brought in for two years and they would be eligible to serve anywhere in the world. It was only when conscripts were actually being sent to Viet- nam that the movement began to take on mass proportion. What are the main groups that are now fighting against sending more Australians to Vietnam and bringing back those that are there? Well, there is a proliferation of new organizations and then many traditional organizations. Of the new ones, there is an Organization of women called "September 9, 1966—PACIFIC TRIBUNE—Page 4 SOS, Save Our Sons, which is self-explanatory. It includes wo- men of the most diverse political opinions including women who normally vote for the govern- ment parties and some of them whose husbands are actually officials of the government. They are in this organization because they don’t want to see their own boys involved in a war which has divided the country and where there is no clear united view that it is in any way in the interests of Australia. Then there is a youth move- ment, called the Youth—Cam- paign Against .Conscription and these are the young people who do all kinds of political activity including burning their~ draft cards and who are now involved in defense of themselves and their friends who are being brought to trial for burning their draft cards or for refusing ser- vice. Then there is the peace move- ment in general and a most im- portant part of the anti-Vietnam movement is the trade unions. The trade unions were the archi- tects of the anti-conscription movement in the First World War and they maintain this po- sition. Many of them of course take a very strong view about the Vietnam war, the causes of the Vietnam war and carry on edu- cational work about the nature of American intervention. Then the two political parties which take up a position of op- position to conscription and opposition to the Vietnam war are the labor party and the Com- munist party. The position of the CP is a clear one; opposition to the position of American imper- ialism. It supports the position of the NLF and the socialist state in North Vietnam. The Labor Party’s position is an interesting and a somewhat complicated one. The Labor Par- ty for many years had a similar position to the government on foreign policy and was totally for the American alliance. At the time when the Americans began to bomb North Vietnam the Labor Party gave sympathe- tic understanding but the posi- tion of the Labor Party has been one of tremendous discussion and upheaval and thinking over the Vietnam isue. In the first place the Labor Party had every member of the opposition voting against the conscription bill and then of total opposition to the involvement of the conscripts in Vietnam and when the first con- script was killed in Vietnam the Labor Party announced that it would, when and if returned to office, withdraw the conscripts. This idea was later evolved into a policy which went to the Labor Party conferences earlier this year and is now Labor Party policy for the elections that will POR SS SEA aa 2 me NE take place at the end of the year. They speak of the war in Viet- nam as a dirty war, an unwinna- ble war and they no longer have a position of support in-any way for this war, although they still make some allowances for the American alliance and their de- sire to maintain a position with the Americans. Actually they are moving all the time into re- thinking questions of foreign policy and they even raise now that such things as that the SEATO pact should be rewritten and become a kind of a cultural aid organization. But within the Labor Party, of course, there is not one view. The Labor Party represents a variety. of trends of social de- mocracy and there are extreme right wing pressures. of which the recent resignation of one member of the Labor Party in Parliament is an example. Could you tell us something about the type of activity that trade unions are involved in, in relation to the war in Vietnam? ~ You find trade unions in all ‘of the big demonstrations. Many of the trade unions issue their own leaflets advertising demon- strations, informing their mem- bers and educating the public in general, about what are the is- sues in Vietnam. A very large number of trade unions donated money and had full page advertisements in the daily newspapers taking issue with the government on aspects of its policy, and in particular about the use of the conscripts. The trade unions organized spe cial meetings. a= There have been trade union teach-ins which have been quite interesting developments because the trade unions stood aside when the teach-ins began and they. were very largely directed to students. Several trade unions now have held such forms of teach-in. In the railway work- shop over a series of days at lunch time the trade unions on the job held sort of a running teach-in, as it were. There were speakers of various views on different days including some very reactionary speakers who the workers heard out but it was a very important education- al forum because they were able to compare the various view- points both of those in favor of ~ involvement in the Vietnam war and those who opposed it. The trade unions have given a very large amount of support to the young people who have been arrested in demonstrations and have provided funds and legal aid to many of the young people who have sought -to fight the conscription bill either as con- scientious objectors or as draft card burners or now as actually refusing service. The first boy who has come up for trial is a young teacher and the defense organization received the assistance of the teachers’ federation, teachers’ union. There is one very interesting case about trade union activity and that’s the case of the Sea- men’s Union. To give the back- ground of this: the government was faced with a rising opposi- tion to the involvement of the conscripts in war and the Gallup Polls were showing that there were about 60 percent of the people opposed to the use of the conscripts. In my view, the government was seeking some kind of diver- _ difficulties of democracy, : problem of the electoral districts sion to take the heat off itself and so it announced that those Australian soldiers who were in Vietnam were short of comforts, they didn’t have enough tobacco, beer and these sorts of things, — and there were not enough naval ships to take these things and — so they were arranging for two — of the ships of the National Shipping Lines. Now the Sea- men’s Union -is probably the - most militant union in Australia. Its general secretary is a Com- munist, and many of its elected leaders are Communists. The union has taken a very definite and strong stand in opposition — to the U.S. imperialist war in Vietnam. I think the government assum- ed that the Seamen’s Union would refuse to man-the ships and they would then be able to enter into: a witch-hunt and throw around all those favorite — words. about patriotism and traitors and so on. So the Sea- men’s Union didn’t accommodate the government. It instead ar-— ranged ‘special stop work meet- ings in every port of Australia on one particular day. Questions — were discussed very fully and ‘they decided first of all that they were opposed to the aggres- sion in Vietnam but they were not opposed to the Australian soldiers, many of whom, had volunteered for the army long before Vietnam had come onto the agenda and many of whom _ were conscripts and had had no say in whether or not ‘they would go there. : Their opposition was directed against the government’s policy and not to the soldiers. They — didn’t want to see the soldiers left without comforts, on the — other hand they didn’t want to be tricked into sending war ma- terials into Vietnam. They also — decided that as this was a mat- ter of going into a war zone that — every one who went onto thes@ ships would go as a volunteer. Before the ships went there were demonstrations on the: dockside with the seamen themselves taking part, the crew, other sea- men, other trade unionists, pe0- ple from the peace movement. ’ The ships sailed out of Sydney Harbor and into the harbors 1" — Vietnam with great slogans along the side saying that these ships were peace ships. They took those things which were comforts for the troops. I un derstand that when they were in Vietnam they went out of their way to speak with the Aus- tralian soldiers. The official position of the Australian Council in Vietnam. What chance has the Labor Party got in the coming elec- tion? I think they have quite a rea- sonable chance. There are some which tend to favor the govern- ment party. It rather depends, I think, on whether the govern- ment can maintain some control over a downward swinging econ- omy in the next few months and also how many casualties there are in Vietnam in the coming period. There was an enormous reaction when the first conscript was killed and there have been many more casualties since and all of this will have some effect on whether the Labor Party will come back into office. inspected the cargoes and only of Trade - Unions is one of opposition t0 the use of conscripts and Aus- — tralian involvement in the wat — the =