ue THE current issue of the Financial Post, Official organ of the big business ee carries a blurb on “How Red- Sf Naions Gnaw At Heart Of Industry.” ae oithor is ‘a character by the name of ae Dloxd. whose “gnawing” screed is : Y informative but right in line with the Post’s cold war against labor. sla “expert” Ronald Williams who a periodic anti-labor stint for Post e rs, Lloyd gnaws on the same bone. i eae of his plaint is that no mat- a much the kindly bosses or their rappers do for a given union in a “iy industry, the “Reds” are never satis- Tf, for instance, the boss should give th © workers a twenty percent wage boost, , : ae insist it should have been ~ *¥Y. If some kind-hearted boss wants Benes a worker to the position of the an Bicteby “boosting” his income, ae S” are sure to be against it. And Oss airow poke in some outfit shows “Red ae in settling grievances, the 'S" are supposed to be against that ae insist that the grievance go be- De mabe: € management. Obsessed with a ithe ae complex, “expert” Lloyd gives me. the boys who clip dividends and coup- heir money’s worth. is ae fatuous treatise on labor relations : prude out with the usual summary of 8 Who in what unions; an estimated LT A “mbership, and the alleged political af- eo of the union leadership. There hat ing new in this Post screed which ene Paper hasn’t previously printed at is he dozen times. The only new thing ae pe aon, who, like all of his breed, what is best to help big business believe it wants to believe. In that sort BONES eh & trance, it will never be able to re- canta ee the truth when it sees it. And ‘ose. course is what makes cold war but $ not the telling of one big lie, telling it often enough. wenjgeantioe, and despite the ‘“Red-led of the it would seem from other pages big Organ of corporate capital that the Stiwins are doing all right in their anal ne away at the wealth, resources ‘Their abor productivity of the nation. theip Profits are still at peak levels and ' Shawing urge still strong for more, is ‘re no slip of the pen that caused est editor to. congratulate Vancou- On-Partisan city council in its coed ‘ that caused the Post to assume a =** tough” attitude with Canadian rail- a at Y workers in their recent wage sellout ies ee hands of the Railway Association Causes * St. Laurent government; that while 1: © Post to argue and advocate— : ea, business sells Canada short to - tighten kee war trusts—that labor should take Se belt, rolls up its sleeves and ie a at ever wage cuts are suggested _ ‘Ger to keep profit indexes up. uk : he Toronto Globe and Mail, another doughty organ ef toryism and free enter- prise, insists that Canadian unions need streamlining. Too much of the old soap box aura about them to suit the Tory “hrain-trust” on the Globe and Mail. With a nice fatherly pat on the back for the trade anion bureaucrats, the Globe and Mail gets down te the nub of the question. Tied in with the Financial Post’s dithy- ramb, it makes a perfect preview of # fascist “Labor Front.” : _ Away with the idea of the class struggle; that went out with Victorian hoop-skirts, and anyway: Karl Marx, didn’t know any- thing of our modern “way of life.” Away with these base thoughts of more wages. What up-to-date unions should really be thinking about is not wages or shorter working days, but how to “integrate” themselves with management in the nobel cause of “more production.” The fervent way these Tory scribblers utter the words “more production” would actually make the unwary believe it was under-production rather than a suicidal war economy that was raising hell with — the nation. “More production” howled hard enough and long enough might even make some believe that people’s homes are not being built because the loggers and millworkers are not producing enough; that warehouses are choked with food—unsold food—because enough hasn’t been produced? And strikes, that bugaboo of the coup~ on-clipper—away with them too. Strikes have no place in our modern way of life. Labor must see itself as a “partner” with capital, assuming all the responsibilities of industry—except of course, division of the spoils. That must remain the “right” of management as an incentive for its risk investments. In executing its “Lavender and Old Soap Boxes” presentation the Globe and Mail declares the soap box to be as out- moded as the horse-and-buggy- And with the soap box must go the idea of strikes, the urge for decent wages, the right of unions ,to run their own affairs. In place of these historical features of the origin and development of a labor movement must come the single-minded urge to pro- duce . . . produce . . . produce, until we reach a point where the belt-tightening is final and complete and a phenomena more startling than the atom bomb has been evolved — a profit-glutted coupon clipper satisfied with the extent of his gluttony. : It is clear that unions designed to sat- isfy the Financial Post or the Toronto Globe and Mail would cease to be unions in every sense of the word. Even the most skilful trade union faker in the ranks of labor who has enlisted in the cold war as a mercenary of big business is pulled up short now and again by his membership which sees the dangers in his directional drift! ’ The Financial Post’s singling out of “Red-led” unions in actuality means all unions that operate on the principle upon which they were built: to defend and ad- vance the social and economic standards of their membership. That is what gnaws. at- the vitals of the profit plunderbund. The Globe and Mail supplies the dream of the same gang, the ending of the class struggle and the wage slave bowing meek- ly ‘to assume his chains, with “more pro- - duction” engraved upon each link. think of the gravity of a situation that threat to the peace of the world. - = REJOKE relations in tats cout LINENS ca. tio theie|tamrent Ce DN AN ie R vs j =, uu x Saco em: t2 = oan cm i! if (Ei + Wen ae