carry more news and analysis. carry,on labor’s fight in 1978. we intend to do it again. TRIBUNE When the next edition of this paper rolls off the press, we will be on the eve of a two month campaign to keep the Tribune going. On April 1, our annual financial drive will be on again. It is the time each year when we call on our readers to pool their energy, talents and resourcefulness — and their dollars — to help us raise enough money to maintain operations for another year. The clock will run out on our drive about 7 p.m. June 24; our obective is to meet that hour with a minimum of $54,000. Our objective is a minimum one if we are to maintain the size, quality and regularity of our press. Already in the past year we have reduced staff and at times trimmed the number of pages in our editions. Even so, the inflationary spiral that our paper faces is unending; it costs more this year to produce the same as last, and more again if we are to boost production and print more papers and That’s, why we have coined the slogan for ourselves: ‘$54,000 to fight.” If our drive is successful we will have the ammunition to We know it won’t be easy. Many of our supporters are unem- ployed'and those that aren’t habe had their income frozen by wage controls. Students and pensioners have less this year as well. But every year for the last 43, we’ve made our objective, and this year It all begins in one week. Press.club targets will be printed in that issue, fund raising tickets and cards will be circulated, the coming events column will fill up with a host of public events the press builder, honor press builder and club awards will go up for grabs and other will sign up for the ‘‘400 club”. Here in the Tribune office, drive manager Pat O’Connor will put up the master board that will record each dollar on our way to the victory banquet. \__ Please, join our drive. It’s $54,000 to fight! a Attacks on jobless mount By ALD. HARRY RANKIN Have you noticed that the at- tacks on the unemployed have been rising in direct proportion to the rise in the number of unemployed? People who are older than I am tell me that the same thing hap- pened during the great depression of the Hungry Thirties. The propaganda line is this: The unemployed themselves are to blame if they are unemployed. They don’t want to work, they’re too lazy to work, they’re not looking for work, they’re refusing to take the jobs that are available. They would rather be on welfare or unemployment insurance than work; many are cheating and drawing welfare and unem- ployment insurance fraudulently. This is the line being paddled by the spokesmen for both the federal and provincial governments and by the corporation-owned media. The ads you see on T.V. warning people not to cheat on unem- ployment insurance is_ one example. Ottawa is spending $1,000,000 of our money on those ads. These ads won’t cut down on the incidence of cheating — which Civic workers challenge Kamloops city council over contracting out KAMLOOPS — Cupe Local 900 and Kamloops city council ex- changed. words,,.last, week..in..a heated debate over job security for municipal employees. The right wing Kamloops council overruled recommendations from the city’s engineering department and called for tenders to contract out the collection of commercial garbage, a move that prompted a quick response from CUPE. - Municipal employees packed council chambers last week as union business agent Bill Ferguson placed the union’s arguments against contracting out. The council was “‘ambushed by their onths ago, when the B.C. Federatign of Labor began the own brief’’, one Kamloops paper stated, as Ferguson made public the: previously. covered up recommendations of the engineering department against - contracting out. The CUPE brief struck a raw nerve among some of the coun- cillors and set off a display of anger that saw one alderman hurl the brief into the garbage in front of the union members, and mayor. Mike Latta yell threats at Ferguson. Only alerman Nelson Reese stood up for the municipal employees. The contracting out of com- merical garbage will only affect a few workers but it is ‘‘the thin edge of the wedge,’’ Ferguson told the Tribune this week, ‘‘They want to use contracting out to get CUPE in the Okanagan.” Ever since Local 900 successfully concluded a collective agreement for Kamloops school board em- ployees that included a _pace- setting ‘‘no layoff’’ clause, Kamloops mayor Mike. Latta has conducted a stepped up campaign to roll back conditions for Kamloops municipal employees, which rate among the best in Canada. PEOPLE AND ISSUES is small in any case — but they will help them create the impression that many people are cheating and that anyone on unemployment insurance should be looked at with a certain amount of suspicion. The gum-shoe squad that the minister of inhuman resources in B.C. has looking for welfare fraud is another example. This squad costs a lot more than it is worth. The amount of fraud they have uncovered doesn’t equal their salaries and expenses. But the minister and the media give a lot of publicity to every fraud case that is uncovered and so the general impression is created that many people are drawing welfare fraudulently. And it fits right in with the minister’s personal at- tacks on the unemployed and people on welfare and his demand that welfare expenditures be curbed. Nothing is said by the govern- ment or the media, of course, about the corporate welfare bums, the big corporations who get con- cessions and grants annually that run not into the millions but the billions — the oil and gas com- panies, mining companies, CPR and so on. These corporate welfare bums have been an expense to the taxpayers year after year, but you don’t see anyone investigating them. By means of a cute little item called ‘‘deferred income tax’’, they are even exempted from paying their full income taxes. What is the purpose of all this propaganda? One reason, of course, is to take governments off the hook. They are responsible for devising policies that will provide full employment and they are doing nothing to bring insuch policies. It’s very convenient for them if the unemployed themselves can be blamed for being unemployed instead of blaming it on’ the lack of government action to deal with the unemployment crisis. Another reason is to force people to work for low wages, for the minimum wage or less. Our millionaire minister of human resources for example, operates a as unemployment rises business where wages for some jobs are only $3.50 an_ hour. Keeping wages at the poverty level means more profits, and can also be used against efforts of organized labor to keep up its wages with the rising rate of in- flation. Still another reason is to cut back on unemployment insurance, unemployment insurance which is paid for by workers themselves, started off as a program to tide over people while they are unemployed. Every year the federal government has brought in — legislation restricting the number of people who can draw unem- ployment insurance and the length — of time they can draw it. Gradually the original purpose of unem- ployment insurance has been undermined. And today voices are being raised demanding that unemployment insurance by provided only on a means test basis. What it all adds up to is this: We're in the midst of an economic recession that shows no signs of recovery. Big business in this country is determined that its profits will not only be maintained but increased, in spite of the economic depression. One of the main sources of profit is contracts and tax concessions from the federal treasury. If the budget is used to provide job programs and ~ to increase purchasing power for working people, there will be less left for hand-outs to the corporate welfare bums. It’s as simple as that. The living standards of working people are now under attack right and left. The role of unions in leading the fight for decent living: standards and labor’s rights are \ now more decisive than ever. The . fight for jobs, which is a political fight for new government policies, is a key question today for the whole labor movement. Municipal councils too must be drawn into this fight and it is important for labor to get into municipal politics, to. promote candidates that represent the needs of labor and all working people. Ls mammoth task of organizing transportation to take hundreds of people to Victoria for the Citizens’ Lobby for Jobs, it probably anticipated that the Social Credit’ government and the Crown company, the B.C. Ferries Corporation, would do whatever they could to frustrate Federation plans for moving people from the mainland to Vancouver Island. — “That, of course, has happened. According to lobby organizers, the Ferry Corporation has effectively blocked the attempts by the Federation to have a special ferry scheduled in order to transport demonstrators. But now it seems that the Ferry Corporation’s reasons for not scheduling the special ferry — that it would be an un- precedented move — is about as phoney as the Bennett’s claims about the state of the economy. In fact, a special ferry has been scheduled before, lobby organizers have discovered — but for a rather different kind of event. Last year, the Ferry Corporation put on a special sailing on the day of the opening of the Legislature to bring over a crowd of special guests — the Socred party faithful among them — to attend a tea party and general get-together following the opening ceremonies in the House. Perhaps the lobbyists should say that they’re all car dealers — and only on their way to the Empress for tea and crumpets. ee ee & hen the Vancouver Labor Council, COPE, the B.C. Students Federation, the Downtown Eastside Residents Association and a new organization of the unemployed brought the matter of unemployment to Vancouver city council last week, they successfully pressured the city into endorsing the March 30 jobs lobby and agreeing to look at how the city can create jobs. The attention focused on the unemployment debate, however, overshadowed another decision by city council PACIFIC TRIBUNE—MARCH 24, 1978—Page 2 that day, to create more unemployment by cutting the annual grant of the Downtown Eastside Residents’ Association to $12,000 from last year’s $36,000. The TEAM and NPA councillors have an acute case of paranoia that they may be seeing a lot more of one or possibly all three of DERA’s officers, depending on the outcome of November’s civic election. By cutting DERA’s grant, they cut its staff from three to one, and, they hope, DERA’s effectiveness by the same ratio. But Bruce Eriksen, Libby Davies and Jean Swanson aren’t about to draw lots on the available job yet. DERA will appeal the decision and will be back at council in April to try and win another $24,000, although this year it will be tougher. The appeal has, in fact, already started. You can lend a hand by calling TEAM and NPA aldermen and the mayor and letting them know what you think about their vindictive attitude towards an organization that is a credit to Van- couver. eek k & ith MPs falling over each other in their haste to put the final legislative touches on the Alcan pipeline sellout, plans for grandiose port expansions up and down the B.C. coast being dangled like carrots on a stick, and word of another Chretien mini-budget coming in April, one doesn’t have to be much of a handicapper to put the odds on a - summer federal election. The Ottawa strategists will no doubt be surprised to find out, though, that, at least in this province, it’s the Com- munist Party that is well prepared, at this point, for the impending campaign. : Last week, 12 CP candidates and their campaign managers got together to consider the new election act and exchange experiences gathered so far. If the word of the communist campaign hasn’t travelled too far yet, however, it’s not entirely the party’s fault. ne of the 12 CP c Wilson who doubles as a Tribune staff writer when he’s not out debating with Art Lee and Margaret Mitchell in Van- -couver East. Nominated last December, Fred had made his candidacy farely well known in the constituency by early February when he received a call from a Vancouver Province reporter to interview him about the election contest in Vancouver East. After about a fifteen minute conversation with the Province, he looked forward to seeing some of his views in print. Sure enough, a few days later a page five profile of the constituency appeared, but, not unexpectedly, the Province reported only two candidates in the running — Art Lee and Margaret Mitchell. He fired a letter to the editor, correcting the false image the story portrayed and noting the omission of his can- didacy. Now eight weeks later, his letter hasn’t appeared either, which, we assume, would normally be a courtesy afforded to a candidate for public office who was blacked out of a story. “They have proved my point,” Fred says, ‘but the problem is, nobody knows about it.”’ RiBsUuUNeE Editor — SEAN GRIFFIN Business and Circulation Manager — PAT O'CONNOR Published weekly at Suite 101 — 1416 Commercial Drive, Vancouver, B.C. V5L 3X9 Phone 251-1186 Subscription Rate: Canada, $8.00 one year; $4,50 for six months; All other countries, $10.00 one year Second class mail registration number 1560 | } H t | | |