June 24 th, 1974

the water ‘supply main with Chey crews; and a memorandum from the City E Engineer,
June ith, 1974, advising “that the s Assistant City bagineer had proposed a com -
pletely different Toute for the s supply ‘main . (Exon that of the B. c. “Hydro-Dury_
Street route) which follows the East side of the Coquitlam. River yFecomnending
that the alternate route be chosen, and ‘advising that if completion by June,
1975, is satisfactory, the Gesign ¢ can be completed by the Engineering Depart

merit and the construction » completed by an expanded Water Works crew.

Moved by Alderman Thompson:

Seconded iby 4 Alderman Reryluk:

That as _Fecommended in a menorandur frou the City Engi ineer, June 14th,
1974, and supported in a report fre the Public Works Committee, June 2st,
1974, the South Side supply Main he constructed along the alternate route

suggested by the Assistant city Engineer following the East side of the

Coquitlam River South to Mevy i Read from the G.V. R. D. main on the Lougheed

Highway, with the work to be completed by June, i975, thewdesign prepared by,
the Engineering Department, and the construction undertaken by an expanded
Water Works crews: . a carried.
- Prior to passage of the e foregoing resolut ton, the City Engineer gave a
detailed backgtound report on the original and revised design of the supply
ain, and following a brief discussion, the Council generally expressed ap~
proval of the aiternate Toute proposed by the Assistant City Engineer .
P Wks .Comm.re From the Public Works Committee, June 2ist, 1974, submitting a menoran-
garbage disposal
dum from the City Engineer dated June 18th, 1974, concerning garbage disposal,
and a report from the Public Works Committee and the Environnental Protection
Sub-Committee, Decenber 15th, 1972, on the Solid Wa ste Recycling Study, wherein
six recommendations were approved by council and subsequently the G ‘V. R. D.
agreed to provide the sum of ¥5 000. 00 to assist in a Solid Waste “Recycling
Pilot Project. The Committee, in its report, stated it feels that garbage
cullection service is a direct measurable service similar to domestic water
and sanitary sewer service, and that a direct charge for the service is a
reasonable approech; ako, it is felt that if the. recycling project is “appro-
ved and is successful, some reduction in charges might be considered by Council.

Moved by Alderman Thompson:

Seconded by Alderman Keryluk:

That as recommended in a report from the Public Works Committee, June

2ist, 1974, the following recommendations set ferth ina memorandum from

the City Engineer, June lth, 1974, be approved;

1. One garbage pick-up per week be provided tomch residential dwelling