EDITORIAL PAGE * Comment ‘Close-Up’ A= TV fan laboring under the illusion that U.S. McCarthy- ism doesn’t exist in Canada must have got a rude awakening by last Sunday’s CBC-TV “Close-Up” pro- gram. The stale red-herring of “com- munism” in the Mine-Mill union served the CBC boys as a media for demonsirating their several qual- ifications for membership on any Birchite “Un-American Activities” inquisition, if as and when called upon to serve. It was no accident of course that such a shameless anti-labor pro- gram should be featured on the eve of the Mine-Mill international convention. Had CLC President Jodoin or Steel’s Larry Sefton planned the timing or the theme ef this nation-wide anti-commun- ist TV smear to facilitate their cannibalistic raiding of Mine-Mill membership in Sudbury and else- garbage where. (which perhaps they did?) they couldn’t have turned in a fil- thier job than did this CBC-TV impudent inquisition. Having set their stage on the old theme “are you still beating your wife” guilt complex, union leaders are “accused” by inference, invendo and the meanderings of an obvious stool pigeon that they are “guilty” of the Jodoin-Seften- CBC allegations of “communism”? In the early days of Mine-Mill its leaders and members used to be faced with monopoly gunmen, thues, armed vigilantes and the “judicial” frameup. Names like Rio Bill Haywood, Joe Hill, Gin- ger Goodwin are written deep in its history. Today Mine-Mill is faced with the Communist “smear” by com- bined gevernment agencies, CBC- TY “culture”, labor fakers and union raiders. Editorial comment... t is reported that the Diefen- baker cabinet have decided to set aside a room in the Parliament buildings where perplexed MPs can retire for an hour of “quiet contemplation.” While this will be a decided im- provement over having to retire to the men’s washroom to “com- mune with the infinite,” it holds certain political hazards for Can- adians. It may be recalled that when the late Liberal chieftain Mackenzie King was feeling the burdens of government weighing heavily, he used to spend numerous hours in Seance consultation with the spooks—ther bedevil Canada with the end results of his “quiet con- sultations.” * * * Among other things the score board could probably be regarded as a tribute to the infinite and seemingly endless patience of the Chinese people. On March 21st the Chinese For- eign Office issued its 193rd pro- test against U.S. military air and naval provocations and incursions: upon the territorial sovreignity of the Republic of China. What if the situation were re- versed? Then we’d hear Kennedy, Dief, Green and company howéing to high heaven about “aggression.” Pacific Tribune Editor — TOM McEWEN Associate Editor—-MAURICE RUSH Business Mgr.—OXANA BIGELOW Published weekly at Room 6 — 426 Main Street Vancouver 4, B.C. Phone MUtual 5-5288 Subscription Rates: ne Year: 4.00 — Six Months: $2.25 Canadian and Commonwealth coun- tries (except Australia): $4.00 one vear. Australia. United States and all other countries: $5.00 one year. Antk-rized as second class mail by the Post Office Department, Ottawa, ana for payment of pestage in cash- But the Chinese, we don’t even “recognize” them. All we recog- nize is the boost to our trade pro- fits by their wheat dollars. * * * We don’t know what sort of a hassle the Burnaby Liberal As- sociation was in when it turned thumbs-dewn on ex-Liberal MP Tom Goode as its candidate for Burnaby-Richmond in the coming federal elections. But whatever it was it was all to the good since Goode was never rated as being any good for the people of Burnaby-Richmond. Dollar ‘Democracy’ he recent. elections in the Ar- gentine should serve to drive home a lesson to working people everywhere; one that is all too. readily forgotten or ignored. In their fulminations against the Soviet Union and other Socialist countries, the bourgeoisie and their right - wing social democratic lackies never tire of bemoaning the absence of “democratic elections”, the “supremacy of the ballot box”’, the right to “vote” for more than “one party”, etc. and ete. But when the vast majority of the Argentine people, its labor movement and its impoverished peasantry, vote solid for the party of its choice and as a result vote Wall Street’s puppet Frondizi gov- ernment out of office, that is a “horse of a different color”. Then its “to hell with democracy and the ballot box” while the military and ? reaction take over to keep the “neoples’ choice” out of their el- ected positions, and thereby “save” Argentine for Wall Street. Of course the post-election situ- ation in Argentine today has many parallels in Latin American coun- tries. Whenever and whereever the people of those countries elect a. popular government,. not to the liking of U.S. and/or British im- perialism, “democracy” nose-dive, its institutions and aims swept out by a military junta or — reactionary cabal, either or both in the service of and financed by U.S. imperialism. In today’s Argentine as else- where in the phere, U.S. imperialism “saves” democracy by destroying it; by substitutine “dollar aid” to reac- takes a Southern Hemis- — tion and labelling the end result | “democracy”. ‘An injury to one...’ | he mass arrests in recent days of some 70 Sons of Freedom Doukhobors in the Kootenays bids fair to become Canada’s greatest “cause celebre” in the annals of civil liberties. The charge so far against the arrested Doukhobors include “con- spiracy to intimidate the Parlia- ment and Legislature... between 1955 and 1962”, by their activities in various B.C. centers during that period. (At press time bail had not yet been granted the Sons). Already questions are being asked; can justice emerge from an, atmosphere of prejudice? Can 2 person so charged be tried for an offense (now labelled “intimida- tion”), for which he has already served a penaliy? Can a govern- ment (Parliament) be “intimid-— ated” for nearly a decade without having recourse to settling the said cause of “intimidation”, or does it merely solve the problem — by tossing the alleged “intimida- tors” in the hoosegow? Ironic as it may seem, this. civil liberties issue for a dissident mi- nority may become a challenge t0 the liberties of all. Tom McEwen O: newspapers have a value reming us in today’s changing world how little some things do change. : _ Couple of weeks ago Sam Eng- lish of Michel dropped into the ‘PT office. Despite a prolonged and grave illness Sam’s fighting spirit remains undimmed. Never empty- - handed, he brought us an old dog- eared edition of The Daily Herald of Nanaimo, dated February 6th, 1914, which boasted the ‘largest. circulation of any Vancouver Is- land paper.” On its front page is a news item, the court conviction of Sam’s coal miner father, William English, for his participation in the Nanaimo miners strike of 1912. The Daily Herald, an early pioneer of anti- labor journalism in B.C., describes the miners strike as the “Nanaimo riot trials,’ and slanders the min- ers union leaders of that day in much the same terms as the ‘free press” of our day describes any un- ion leader worthy of his salt. Top of the front page is a picture of “General” Rosalie Jones, (“Mother’”’ Jones-in the great Am- erican labor movement of the time), leading her heroic little all their own. They serve to - band of suffragette women from New York to-Albany in bitter mid- winter in the great world-wide campaign to win “Votes for Wo- men’’. Sort of reminded us that a lot of things we take today for granted cost the workers of an earlier day a lot of hardship, suf- fering and struggle to win. That’s why we should never let any of la- bor’s hard-won gains go easily. Another front-page story has a today’s aroma about it. Seems that a group of our early ‘empire build- ers” hdd “bought” the St. Peter’s Indian Reserve lands in Manitoba, (land estimated at $21%4-million) for a lot of glass beads, cheap booze, a spot of bribery and corruption here and there among the chiefs to en- tice them to surrender their lands. When this scandal came before a conference of some ‘eminent, jurors”, among them the late and unlamented Arthur Meighan, (then a tory minister of justice), these worthy jurists, pinch-hitting for the land-grabbers, decided the ‘deal’ must stand; that “Parliament could do nothing,” and that if the In- dians wanted ther lands back they could go to the courts? Reminds us of a big cement company “deal” which got all set to squat on Indian lands and plunk a cement plang down on the front door of an his- toric Indian church 52-years later. The Daily Herald “Indian Scan- dal” story reminds us that. the bourgeoisie of 1914 and 1962 have one inherent trait in common; their readiness to steal other people’s property and describe the theft as - Company unionism, the dream of “free enterprise’. The real DH piece-de-resistance however is a full-length editorial, scalped from the Financial News of the day and captioned ‘‘The Les- sons of the Nanaimo Coal Strike.” What are these “lessons” which must have been an all-night ordeal for the editor to think up? That un- ions are no good, (in this case the United Mine Workers of America) and the same goes for union lzad- ers, (in this case UMWA Frank Farrington). Rank and file workers are “dupes” and the union leaders, huge diamonds sparkling on their fingers and tie-pins . . . are loaded with affluence and oratory.” Re- sult: “a ruined industry” and more jf hardship for the union “dupes”. But the Herald has a solution; “why not return to the old system of regular meetings of the men’s committees with the operators?” every exploiter, then and now. This ancient editorial also car- ries a warning to IWA leadership. The editor sees the lumber indus- try “‘loadeq with agitators and small-fry communists’ and dole- fully poses the question; ‘is the lumber industry to suffer the same fate as the Vancouver Island coal industry?” Tch, tch. “Unlike the “Minards Liniment” advt. punch-line ending to most columns in the Daily Herald its ~ splenetic anti-labor editorial does not close with advice to readers that ‘“Minards Liniment Cures Distemper.” That is reserved for another column, —_—, SON ee