ia eek Mig uae eh 2 eS - Central theme at coming PUWP congress | THONUOUUOUAUUnanenuuuuneNaeuUNeQQOUUUOCOOOUUUEUOUOUUCOEOOGOUUUOHEGHHL » Some 300 readers and supporters of the Komorowski, columnist for the New York Daily World, discussed recent developments in Poland, and afterward | answered a flood of questions raised by the audience. : The evening was part of the Tribune’s * Ongoing commitment of bringing to its Teaders and the Canadian public facts » about life throughout the socialist world, facts which the big business controlled Press energetically tries to suppress and _ The enthusiastic audience responded to 8 call by the chairman, Tribune manager rman Brudy, with pledges and cash amounting to $7,000, a healthy one-night os on. Metro Toronto’s target of 650, LUTTE The situation in Poland is serious. We're facing a difficult and complicated eo there. Make no mistake about What is taking place is a very hard Class struggle with Poland’s future on the ‘agenda. And-the question is: who will win? ; Over the past period we have seen a | form of creeping counter-revolution. It’s - a different kind of counter-revolution, Not in the form of an armed uprising, but a counter-revolution of a peaceful character, relatively speaking. The aim here is to achieve, step by step, a situation in which counter-revolu- tion can replace the Polish United Work- ers’ Party and move toward capitalist Testoration. Rightist anti-socialist ele- ments have been using public discontent to attack the foundations. of socialism. This is made evident by the series of Strikes which has plagued Poland in the Past period. On one hand it reflects an effort of workers to resolve legitimate grievances which have accumulated over years and which the trade union fe cnet in Poland did not properly re-. ct. That’s why there was the move away from the central trade union movement towards Solidarity. But the strikes also had another side ' which, objectively speaking, had nothing to do with the aims and aspirations of the Polish working class. Those who were 8uiding the strikes from behind the Scenes aimed at destabilizing Poland's €conomy, prevent a return to normalcy the overcoming of the crisis. aim of destabilization was clear €nough: add to the difficulties facing Po- > Open the door to shortages, create Conditions for sharpening discontent by. working people with the Govern- Ment, the PUWP and the socialist state, . and create conditions for more direct ac- Hon against socialism. 2A second feature of creeping counter- revolution was the beginning of a chal- > lenge by Solidarity to the Polish United Workers Party. When agreement was Teached between Government and Sol- idarity it was clearly spelled out by Sol- darity that it upheld the leading'role of the PUWP in the building of socialism, 8nd would not aim to contest political | Power. In other words, that Solidarity Would confine itself to the problems of Workers, This was the basis of the agreement — ‘that Solidarity would not become an op- § oe ional force against the PUWP and lalism, This was equally true of Rural Solidar- ity. That body, too, signed an agreement which recognized the PUWP as the lead- ing force in building socialism. This agreement also included recognition of the United-Peasant Party as part of the - alliance of workers and farmers in the building of a socialist system of society. What has happened since that agree- pent was reached? Interestingly enough, now on the eve of the emergency con- gress of the PUWP scheduled to take place July 14-18, and which has pub- lished its policy statement for debate among the Polish people, Solidarity has issued a program which appears to be a _ challenge to the document advanced by the PUWP. The Solidarity document which only devotes a few lines to trade union mat- ters, doesn’t once speak of the agree- ment it signed which recognizes the lead- ing role of the PUWP, doesn’t once speak about building socialism in Poland, - doesn’t once speak about the inter- national alliance to which Poland belongs which is the guarantee of Polish in- dependence — but speaks of the Solidar- ity movement as a so-called independent force that sees the socialist state as an alien, hostile force. Marxists know that the capitalist state is an oppressive weapon against the working class, the working, people and democracy. That’s capitalism. The socialist state, even though it may sometimes make mistakes — and it has unfortunately — is not an oppressive weapon against the working class and its allies. It is a means by which the working class can maintain power and_ build socialism. Without a socialist state there would be no working class power and if classes there are two ideologies — the ideology of capitalism and the ideology of socialism. There is no third ideology. Unfortunately, in the past period of time the PUWP allowed complacency to take over in the ideological struggle. It became preoccupied with the necessity of industrial development and allowed the ideological struggle to take a back seat. In real life as in nature there are no vacuums. What the PUWP let drop was picked up by others to strengthen capital- ist ideology and nationalism. In fact some views were spread inside the PUWP that a stage of development had already been reached whereby the ideological-political ‘struggle could be forgotten. Polish socialism is paying a heavy price for becoming lax on this front. : Any. party claiming to be a Marxist- Leninist party that foregoes the ideo- logical struggle unwittingly opens the door to capitalist ideas whether in condi- tions of socialism or in conditions of capitalism. Thiseis an absolute law of development if one is permitted this term. Because of shortcomings in the ideo- logical struggle and the. penetration of - alien ideas among some communists, ideological pluralism seemed to be an ac- ceptable idea together with the idea of political pluralism. Recently there has been a concentra- tion of capitalist media attention on the forthcoming emergency congress of the PUWP. This is not accidental. It sees the revisionist elements, the rightist forces in and outside of Solidarity as a factor_in transforming the PUWP into some varia- tion of a social democratic party. All its » ey : Remarks by CPC leader William Kashtan at a public meeting, Toronto, May 15. a See ee ee en ee ai - without working class power there would be no socialist state. By speaking of the socialist state as an alien force the groundwork is being laid by the anti-socialist forces in Poland to separate the trade unions from responsi- bility in building socialism. Thus instead of adhering to the agree- ment it signed, Solidarity is being pres- sed to take on a political character, the purpose of which is to challenge the lead- ing role of the PUWP, and appear as an oppositional force to the PUWP and to socialism. This is but a first step to the next one, that of wresting power away from the PUWP and restoring capitalism. : This dangerous situation is further complicated by the fact that within the PUWP itself, different voices are heard. That, in fact, has been the problem from the time of the crisis. : What has emerged in the PUWP is a revisionist force which challenges the basic principles of a Marxist-Leninist party. There is a meeting of minds here between these revisionist elements and rightists and anti-socialist elements in and outside Solidarity. What do the revisionists advance? They advance a challenge to the princi- ples of democratic centralism. They see no reason why there could not be fac- tions within the PUWP. We have had some experiences with this in our own party and so have other Communists and Workers parties during the revisionist wave.some years ago. : These revisionist elements also raise the question of ideological pluralism. However, Lenin made the point many years ago that in the struggle between chatter about ‘interference’? by the Soviet Union and the other socialist countries in Polish affairs has one aim at this stage — to help build up hostility to the Soviet Union and widen opposition to socialism in Poland. The central ideas being advanced for the emergency congress is that of social- ist renewal. It is important to note this because Solidarity also speaks of renew- al but not socialist renewal. There are these two different concepts, two differ- ent roads, two different paths of development advanced. The PUWP calls for an alliance of all forces who are for socialist renewal as the pre-condition for an independent Poland. It has spelled this out to include Solidarity, the Catholic Church, women, youth, the au- tonomous and branch unions. It has declared it will do everything to preserve and consolidate socialism and the alliance with the Soviet Union and the other socialist countries. It sees as the most important task at the coming Congress pulling the country out of the crisis, the development of socialist democracy, the strengthening of the leading role of the PUWP in socialist construction, the stabilizing of the. economy. It has correctly stated that the key to.overcoming the crisis lies within the PUWP. The aim is to make the Con- gress a congress of workers. The choice before the Polish people is either socialist renewal, the elimination of mistakes of the past, or the restoration of capitalism. These are the two courses open. There is no third way. There is no need to stress what capital- ist restoration would mean. It would open the door for demands for changes of ~ socialism, The struggle for socialist renewal the Polish borders by the West German revanchists who have never given up the idea that part of the territory of Poland belongs to West Germany. Not only the territorial integrity of Poland is involved but here also the political map of Europe. The USSR and other socialist states have declared their full sympathy and support for the PUWP, the goverment and people. They have given every assis- tance possible to Poland to help the Polish people overcome their difficult moment. They have warned imperialism to keep its hands off Poland. They have expressed confidence that the Polish people will work out their difficult prob- lems, providing imperialism does not interfere in their internal affairs. In face of this complex and dangerous Situation we have different groups in Canada and elsewhere-coming forward as supposed champions of Poland. Right wing social democracy here and in other countries have come forward in support of Solidanty. Mr. Broadbent is one of them. He did not have enough courage to speak up in defénse of the postal workers when their president was jailed, but he apparently had enough courage to defend Solidarity. However he kept quiet about other union bodies which embrace millions of Polish work- ers. Why this difference? The autonomous unions, the branch unions support social- ism while Solidarity, these forces hope, will become a Trojan horse, an instru- ment with which to dismantle socialism. They know the workers wouldn't understand them if they publicly op- posed socialism. They therefore attack totalitarianism, their code word for socialism: This was the essence of a re-- cently held public meeting in Toronto at which one of the officers of the OFL spoke. It is useful here to note that Secretary of State Haig and these right wing social democrats are in the same bed. Haig, too, attacks totalitarianism, meaning but he. is kind to ‘‘authontarianism’’, that is, fascism and reaction. Right-wing social democracy says it is opposed to imperialism and to total- itarianism, that there is a third way. But history has already shown that this so- called third way leads back to capitalism, in fact never goes beyond capitalism. When right-wing social democracy and the ultra-left play the same game as imperialism they ought to be pilloried from door to door, up and down the country by class conscious workers, by real revolutionaries and democrats, as supporters of imperialism. We don’t deny that mistakes were made in Poland. Indeed the PUWP was the first one to say so and state that they had lost the confidence of the workers. They are correcting these mistakes. - Time here is of the essense. Delay, com- placency of procrastination could prove These mistakes are not within the na- ture of socialism. They are deviations from socialism which the PUWP is cor- recting. The ‘‘corrections”’ others strive _ for in and outside Poland, primarily U.S. imperialism, is of a different kind. They lead step by step toward the restoration of capitalism. The struggle between these two roads will be a long and difficult one, because at heart it is a matter of pulling Poland out of a deep crisis. However we are confident that with the support of the socialist community, and of progressive mankind the Polish people led by the PUWP will overcome the crisis. This will be a victory, not only for them, but for peace in Europe and in the world. PACIFIC TRIBUNE—JUNE 5, 1981—Page 9