LABOR By WILLIAM KASHTAN It is symptomatic of the pre- nt state of the Canadian ec- Omy that the last item ap- @earing before parliament as adjourned a report was °m the Unemployment In- ranee Advisory Committee the effect that by May the surance fund would drop to 5 million from. its original peak of almost $1 billion. This Startling fact more 78 anvithing else mirrors the W&tent and scope of unemploy- Reni, It requires no stretch of the Magination to recognize that ook of far-reaching measures achieve full employment Mere is a real danger of the nd going bankrupt. This column warned of that POSSibility last spring and Tew attention to those reac- onary interest who would Ty to use this situation for an Mslaught on the unemployed. “vents have borne this out. Voices are in fact being rais- d now calling for a “weeding ut” of the unemployed, and Or curtailment of unemploy- rent benefits. In the mean- me, as part of a government et tough policy, court action as been instituted against a Towing number of unem- loyed, ek On One had the workers are €ing blamed for pricing Can- aaa of the world market; es nee Uige, the unemployed eing blamed for deplet- 3 and bankrupting the un- pmoument insurance fund, ae lines of attack have the aes Objective: to place the i ian labor movement on ie Sfensive, and prepare # around for undermining - Imited gains it achieved ese hard struggle in the Kina period. ‘Reactionary re pcalsivare already calling rey beriod of austerity to re- ae the alleged “welfare a A. part of this govern- ke Policy seems directed to een ae a certain level of fs Cea eet through which de ermine the 1961 wage ement and depress wages. nas 1s borne out by the goy- ne Benue accomplishments at : ast Session of parliament. entre Widely. assumed that ie ese was called to deal risis ae growing economic hee es ae serious conse- fabo omewel ivery. few © measures proposed will © Of value to th : e une 1S winter, mer 2 ane organized labor move- na In fact all sections of the ee Movement, had pressed FRONT | program, for government in- vestment program for the de- velopment of the economy which would increase rather than decrease ‘the purchasing power of the Canadian people. Instead, government policy was directed to assisting mon- opoly on the general theory that what is good for monop- oly is good for the Canadian people. But experience has al- ready proven that the con- trary is the case. x co * The organized labor move- ment would be committing a grave mistake were it to await with folded arms, the results of the inadequate policies of the Diefenbaker government. The fact that the government rejected the policies advanced by labor only emphasizes the need for. stronger more mili- tant and united action all down the line, to compel the government to act in the in- terests of the Canadian people. __Instead of the annual cap in hand brief to the government which will be presented on Feb. 2 the Canadian Labor Congress ought to undertake a mass lobby on Ottawa to back up its brief. All unions should be invited to participate in such an effort whether in the Congress or not. This includes the Confederation of National Trade Unions and all indepen- dent unions. * * * Morover, with the stormy weather now apparent, no un- ion should be left to sink or swim in the negotiations op- ening up in basie industry. These negotiations, which will embrace over half a mil- lion workers, are of decisive importance to the entire work- ing class. At issue is the ques- tion whether monopoly or the working class will bear the cost of the developing econ- omic crisis. The wage movement in 1961 is thus an integral part of la- bor’s fight against unemploy- ment and its effects. This is why increased purchasing power through wage increases and a reduction in ‘hours of work with no_ reduction in take-home pay ought to be at the heart of labor’s wage pol- icy this coming year. Not austerity for the people but the curbing of the power and profits of monopoly ought to be labor’s watchword. Aci- ing unitedly the trade union movement can begin to check monopoly’s. offensive and make 1961 a year for new ad- vance on the economic and political fields. Failure to do i ‘ - e @ massive public works so can cause grievous harm: to the working class. : OBITUARY Joins PT Staff WILLIAM STEWART, well- known trade unionist and prominent in the progressive movement, has joined the PT staff as circulation man- ager. In addition to leading the fight to extend the papers circulation, Bill will also write for the paper, drawing particularly on his wide contacts in the labor movement. Stewart headed the recent successful drive for 1,500 subscriptions. Morris discusses Moscow stafement Under the title “A New Communist Manifesto,’ Leslie Morris writes in the January- February issue of Marxist Re- view on the profound signifi- cance of the statement issued by the meeting of 81 Commun- ist Parties which he attended in Moscow. He concludes that “Along with the program of the Com- munist Party of Canada, the Moscow Statement is an indis- pensable handbook and guide for every Canadian Commun- ist in his work.” Marxist Review sells for 25 cents per copy and is available at People’s Co-Op Bookstore, 307 West Pender St. Don Warwick, age 46, of! Maple Ridge, died suddenly on December 30. Well known in progressive circles in the district, he was a. long-time subscriber to the Pacific Tribune and :was a member of the ~Communist Party. He is survived by his brother, Frank, and will be missed by ‘his comrades and friends. market, we are being squeezed brought into our country from FARM NOTES U.S. INVESTMENT IN CANADA More than once this column has drawn attention farmers of the control that the U.S. ‘has on our economy and government policies. Due to subsidized dumping of U.S. products on the world out of traditional markets for such Canadian farm products as wheat. Due to U.S. dumping of farm products into B.C., our farmers are even being denied the right to provide food for the home market. These are but two of many examples. It would probably be of in- terest to our farm readers if further information were giv- en on the extent of U.S. in- vestment and control in our country. The Dominion Bureau of Statistics states that in 1958, U.S. interests had invested a total of $14,441,000,000 in Canada. Its preliminary esti- mate for 1959 was $15,725,- 000,000. (The total of all for- eign investments in Canada in 1958 was $18,990,000,000 which means that the U.S. had 76% of it.) Other! sources state that in! 1960, U.S. investment here | reached a total of $17 billions. | A news report (Vancouver Sun, Dec. 12, 1960) says that more than one third of all U.S: investments abroad are in Canada. It should be born in mind that the $17 billions of U.S. investment here is by no means all U.S. capital that was Labor Board turns down lronworkers certification The application ofr -certifi- cation by Canadian Ironwork; ers Local No. 1 for a majority of the structural ironworkers |in B.C. was turned down by the | Board this week. : B.C. Labor- Relations In a ruling that stands in 2 class of its own for audacity the board ruled (1) Ironwork- |ers Local.No. 1 does not con- to the} harmful effects for Canadian | stitute a union under the Act. This in spite of the fact that the same board. had _. earlier granted several certifications to the Local. (2) Notwithstand- ing this, the board ‘is satisfied that a majority of the em- ployees were not at the date of application members in good standing of the applicant. Officials of the Canadian Ironworkers Union point out that at the time of their appli- cation for certification they had more than 65% in all cases, and in some, 100% of the .workers in question as members in good standing of their -union: the outside..On the contrary, in the period from 1946-1950," 40% of the U.S. investment in U.S. controlled companies was generated in Canada from the use of Canadian labor and resources. This $17 billions has been invested in our basic indus- tries — manufacturing, pulp and paper, metals and mining, iron and steel, oils and pipe- lines, utilities, chemical, auto- mobile, merchandising, etc. U.S. interests control 44% of our manufacturing (includ- ing 89% of our rubber, 43% of pulp and paper, 41% of ag- ricultural machinery, 95% of automobiles and parts, 64% of electrical. aparatus and 51% of chemicals.) They also con- trol 71% of our petroleum and: natural gas, 66% of the smelting and refining of non- ferrous native ores, and 45% { of other mining. January 13, 1961—PACIFIC TRIBUNE—Page 7 ANNUAL ALL-SLAV CONCERT Featuring Songs, Music and Dances of Ukraine, Russia, Poland, Yugoslavia QUEEN ELIZABETH THEATRE FRIDAY, JANUARY 20, 8 p.m. TICKETS AVAILABLE at: Theatre Box Office, People’s Co-op Store, 307.W. Pender St.; Ukrainian Hall, 805 E. Pender; Russian Hall, 600 Campbell Av. - Sponsored by Van. Br. Canadian Slav Committee ‘