eee 11000010 11 0,1 ‘Review ‘* EDITORIAL PAGE * | | Comment TOM McEWEN, Editor — HAL GRIFFIN, Associate Editor — RITA WHYTE, Business Manager. Published weekly by the Tribune Publishing Company Ltd. at Room 6, 426 Main Street, Vancouver 4, B.C. — MArine 5288 Canada and British Commonwealih countries (except Australia), 1 year $3.00, 6 months $1.60. Australia, U.S., and all other countries, 1 year $4.00, 6 months $2.50. Authorized as second class mail, Post Offiee Department, Ottawa Printed by Union Printers Ltd., 550 Powell Street. Vancouver 4, B.C. Tom McEwen pown in Lincoln county, Ontario, 2 true-blue Tory Orange Lodge has decided that Canada’s national anthem ® Canada is “subversive” and has re- quested the board of education in the tity of St. Catherines to have it ban ned from all city schools. These doughty followers of King Wil- liam ef Orange who mounted the throne of Britain several centuries ago to Make the world “safe for all good Protestants” have demanded of the board that it designate The Queen as Canada’s official anthem, and sub- stitute The Maple Leaf.Forever in lieu of O Canada as a patriotic school soag. It is sometimes difficult and often Wellnigh impossible to follow these Orange-Tory flights into the realm of ‘ Patriotism,” but this particular epi- Sode reminds me of the little couplet ee by Augustus De Morgan (1806- “Great fleas have little fleas upon their backs to bite ‘em, And little fleas have lesser fleas, and S@ ad infinitum. d the great fleas themselves, in tura, have greater fleas to go on, While these again still greater fleas, amd greater still, and so on.” Such flea-bitten “patriotism” as that advanced by the Lincoln county Orange Order which would discourage the Singing of O Canada, is a good reminder of what would happen to Canada were her destiny left in the hands of such “patriots.” : * k x Writing on Communism in the island of Cyprus where British imperialism is Olding its colonial rule over the Cy- Priots by naked terror and violence, a feature writer of the Manchester Mardian, which cannot be accused of sympathizing with the Communists, Sutlines the role played by the “Reds” - i” that beleaguered island. ... Communists dominate the mal labor movement and the municipal ©ouncils in the important towns of Magusta, Larnaca and Limassol. Their excellent work in the labor field 8S gained the Communists the sup- Port of the vast majority of the organ- ed trade unionists. The Communist Mayors and councillors show integ- tity and ability in local government... N'this they contrast sharply with the. ‘hurch-sponsored Right Nationalist _ barty that is swamped by a single-track Preoccupation with Enosis (Unity with Greece), } “The Communists demand uncon- ditional self-determination, but since €y are opposed to violence they sel- dom conflict with the British adminis- ation. Anti-clerical progressive ele- ™ents tend to sympathize with the Communists, whose philosophy finds Practical expression in the model ™edical clinics and social insurance Schemes for workers, which the British Administration and the Right trade “ions have failed to provide.” With such a record of Communist achievement in the service of the Cypriot people, the thing most feared Y British imperialism in the opinion of the Manchester Guardian writer is . .. the risk that a representative legislature would produce a Commun- ist majority.” Hence the Tory “balance Of terror” to enforce Brtiish imperial- ism’s brand .of “independence” upon the Cypriot people. To Eden and Dulles an elected Com- munist majority: in a free and inde- Pendent Cyprus is too horrible to con-— template so—on with the terror! Canada from sea to sea. ‘This bake oven near Field, B.C., built in 1884, is a reminder of the days when the Canadian Pacific Railway was being pushed through to the Coast to link e ~ Defeat the Padlock Law HE parliamentary correspon- dent of the Winnipeg Free _ Press, Grant Dexter, has described the Quebec Padlock Law in his paper as ‘‘one of the most notorious invasions. of freedom ever to: mar the statute books of this country.”’ But, he added, “‘after 19 years the Quebec Padlock Law is reach- ing the end of the road.” Prophetic words. Never were the people of Quebec — of all Canada — closer to removing the Padlock Law which has hung like a shroud over the political life of that province. A powerful movement of broad proportions has come into being in Quebec and throughout Canada to defeat the Padlock Law. Recently the Canadian Congress ‘of Labor added its enormous sup- port to the fight by subscribing to the Trust Fund to Contest the Pad- lock Law, a fund established to finance heavy legal costs involved in the test case soon to come before the Supreme Court. Eight labor councils in cities across Canada have spoken. Scores of union locals, fraternal organi zation and democratic-minded citi- zens have rallied to the appeal of the Trust Fund. °» The million-voiced condemnation of the Padlock Law has already suc- ceeded in winning a greater meas- ‘ ure of freedom for the labor move- ment in Quebec. The right of labor organizations to distribute leaflets and other materials — so long denied — has now been recognized in Montreal, . a most important victory for free speech. - : Recently the Montreal city ex- ecutive awarded a Labor-Progres- sive organizer an out-of-court settlement to cover damages inflicted by the notorious “‘red squad’’ acting illegally in seizing his books. These are signs of the times, a sure omen that the Padlock Law has reached ‘‘the ‘end of the road. We urge all democratic Cana- dians (and in particular the trade unions) to respond generously to _ the appeal of the Trust Fund for the $10,000 required. Contribu- tions may be addressed to : Trust Fund to Contest the Padlock Law, Box 791, Place d’ Armes, Montreal. The court of public opinion is delivering its verdict in advance of the Supreme Court. If that verdict is now reinforced, by the action of many more people sand organizations across Canada, it will have a most important bear- ing onthe legal outcome of the “test case’” to have the law ruled ultra vires of the province and hence unconstitutional. Hal Griffin plight of our senior citizens sel- dom comes under review without some politician reminding us that the measure of a civilization is the way it treats its old people. . By that measure we have little to be proud of, but the U.S. should hang its head in shame, for it has now taken to stripping its old people of even those pension rights they have. The persecution of “Pop” Mindel is a case in point. And the facts, as they were written by his 70-year old wife, Rebecca, in a letter that came to my desk the other day, form: thein own damning indictment of the persecutors. This is what she wrote: * * Y Dear Friend: I am Rebecca Mindel, wife of Jacob Mindel, who is now serving a two- year prison sentence under the Smith Act since January 1955. . . . My husband, a Marxist scholar, 74 years old, and ill with heart disease and complicated chronic stomach dis- ease, faces another year behind prison bars. Not having been charged with any overt act, he is imprisoned for his ideas on peace and amity among all nations. In September 1955, after one-third of his sentence was served, he was denied parole. Neither age nor illness moved the Parole Board. Indeed, no Smith Act prisoner has been granted parole... The Social Security Administration has terminated old age insurance pay- ments to us, leaving us with nothing. They do this after having accepted by husband’s contributions since the in- ception of Social Security in 1936. I am 70 years of age and my hus- band’s cheques were my only means of support. Now the greatest killer of all to a man with heart disease — anxiety and worry — has struck. I fear that great anxiety and constant worry over my situation, with no means of liveli- hood, will spell the end for my husband. Today the entire Smith Act is being reviewed in the courts and by public opinion. I feverently hope that all de- cent and humane people will support the petition to President Eisenhower of 46 outstanding Americans for amnesty for all Smith Act prisoners... They called the attention of the president to the “noticeable trend to reaffirm the basic democratic traditions of our country” and to the several ‘elderly and sick among the Smith Act prisioners. I ask all within reach of my voice —what does it avail our great nation to keep a man, 74 and ill, in prison for his ideas ? ; How does taking away a pension, rightfully theirs, from an aged and sick couple, appear to the American people and the people of the world? I know in my heart, you will agree with me that it can bring only shame and disgrace to our nation’s good name and honor. j Please write to President Eisenhower, The White House, Washington, D.C., urging him to rescind the tyrannical act of the Social Security Board and to grant immediate amnesty to my hus- band. ; ' I would deeply appreciate a copy of your letter to the president. REBECCA MINDEL P.S.—Today’s mail even brings the astounding demand from the Social Security Board that I pay them back $939.90. FEBRUARY 24, 1956 — PACIFIC TRIBUNE — PAGE 5