June LOth,.1974

provided they maintain the fences ard keep the property tidy;

AND THAT they each be charged the nominal fee of $60.00 per year for the use

of the property. a 7 me Carried. a
City Adm.re
rental of ~
So Justice Bld
10th, 1974, containing a recommendation regarding rental of the court area of the office space

; oo an a _ to Prov.Govt
Justice Building to the Provincial Governmeat, and the subsequent request of Council

From the City Administrator, June 7th, 1974, referring to his report of May

to determine whether it was possible to negotiate an additional rate over and above
the rental figure for heat, light, and janitorial services - advising ‘he had ob-
tained information fron Mr. R.A. LeClair, Municipal Manager, District of Coquitlam
regarding the makeup of the annual rental figure and that he can confirm the cost
of utilities, janitor services and supplies, buildings and grounds maintenance,
including garbage and snow removal, and building insurance, has been calculated

in the annual rental figure. The City Administrator, in his report, further adv-
ised that the rate per square foot for these costs has been worked out at $2.25

per square foot and this rate was determined by taking the actual 1973 costs and
increasing them by 20%, with a further 20% for the second year of rental; therefore
the full cost of these services for the portion of the building occupied by the
Provincial Government will be recovered.

Moved by Alderman Mabbett:

@ seconded by Alderman Laking:

That aS recommended in a report from the City Administrator, May lOth, 1974,
the proposed lease by the Province of the section of the Justice Building occupied
by the Magistrate's Office and related office areas for court facilities on the
basis thus far determined by the Nunicipal Manager of the District of Coquitlam,

be accepted. — . Carried.
Aldermen Laking and Mabpett voted against the resolution.

Prior to passage of the foregoing resolution, Alderman Mabbett expressed the
view that the proposed rental figure was not high enough, and Alderman Laking
stated he agreed.

From the City Administrator, June 7th, 1974, stating that at the regular meet-City Adm.re

Bill 75-82.
ing of May 6th, 1974, he was requested to examine the requirements of Bill 75 with limit-renta

increases
respect to obtaining exemption for the municipality from the 84 limitation on ren-
tal increases, and advising that Section 3(2) of the Act provides that upen appli-
ation by the Council, the Lieutenant-Governor, upon being satisfied that it un-
reasonable to require that residential rents be Limited to an 8% increase, may
order that the limitation does not apply or that it does not apply subject to cer-

tain terms and conditions. The City Administrator, in his report, stated that on

contacting the Attorney General's Department, was advised that there is no definite