” CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1 THE WESTERN CANADIAN LUMBER WORKER "The Big Lie About Medical Insurance” percentage of the population has this kind of coverage? A total of 3,379,379 — or just 18 percent. And what kind of coverage is this lucky 18 percent getting? A remarkable survey, recently completed in Hamilton, Ont., suggests that they are covered for less than one quarter of their total health costs. This exhaustive and detailed study involving a carefully selected sample of almost 1,000 families was completed last fall by Dr. Theo- dore Goldberg of the department of political economy, University of Toronto, with the help of the Steelworkers’ Union. It examined two different medical plans, each considered excellent in its respective fields. One was the profit-making Travelers Insurance plan which covers employees of the Steel Company of Canada. The other was the non-profit, doctor-sponsored Physicians’ Services Incorporated plan which covers employees of the International Harvester Co. The study revealed that the PSI plan, generally considered the best obtainable, paid only 23.5 percent of the average total health costs of the families who subscribed to it. Yet the people who have PSI, or its equivalent, are well off compared with the remaining five million who have some lesser form of private health insurance. These people are being deluded if they believe the medical association’s phrase about “reasonable medical insurance.” The Hamilton survey revealed that the Travelers Insurance plan paid only 12.9 percent of the average family’s total health costs. This is reasonable? Yet, compared with many, this is an excellent and reputable company. As | showed in a previous page in MACLEAN‘S, there are hundreds of thousands who haven’‘t got even this — who are saddled witli loophole-riddled policies which can be canceled at the company’s whim. It is worth repeating these statistics, in the light of the twaddle being published today about free-enterprise insurance: ONLY 18 PER- CENT OF ALL CANADIANS ENJOY THE BEST KIND OF PRIVATE PLAN. AND EVEN THIS KIND OF PLAN PAYS LESS THAN ONE QUARTER OF A FAMILY’S TOTAL ANNUAL HEALTH COSTS. Total annual health costs, of course, include everything from drugs to dental work. But even setting aside all this and sticking simply to Physicians’ Services, the Hamilton figures are revealing. THE PSI PLAN PAID ONLY 58.7 PERCENT OF ALL DOCTORS’ BILLS. THE TRAVEL- ERS’ PLAN PAID ONLY 30.4 PERCENT. These statistics are pretty shattering. For years the opponents of a national health scheme — such as the Canadian Chamber of Com- merce — have been telling us that in a vigorous individualistic society (as opposed to the old bogey, the Welfare State) it ought to be each citizen’s right — nay, his responsibility — to choose his own kind of medical plan. Now we discover that he really hasn’t got the choice. Unless he joins the army or enters a mental home he can’t get the kind of all-inclusive policy so many people obviously desire. A Toronto machinist named David Hall, for instance, thought he had provided for his family. When one of his children contracted a rare disease called cystic fibrosis his company plan paid 80 percent of his drug bills. But then Hall’s company folded. Health plans aren’t portable, and when he took a new job he discovered that the new plan, like most private plans, doesn’t cover pre-existing diseases. Now he’s faced with drug bills of more than $1,500 a year. CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1 “Dispute” . a violation of the historic prin- Canadian labor contends the CMU-SIU dispute is pure- ly a Canadian matter and should be settled in Canada. It warns that American inter- ference in the matter is a threat to the good relations between international unions that span the U.S.-Canadian border. Meanwhile, the Canadian government is understood to view the lake dispute with serious concern. It regards the U.S. boycott of Canadian ships as a threat to trade and tion to the SIU to stop bother- ing CMU ships. At the same time, the Pear- son-Kennedy accord produced high-level efforts to bring CLC President Claude Jodoin to a meeting with AFL-CIO President George Meany. They met last week in Wash- ington, aired the dispute, but did not reach any agreement. They are expected to meet again after the Norris report is available. EXPOSE! From The Sunday Telegraph, & London: Sir Solly Zuckerman, sec- = retary of the London Zoo, wrote a learned treatise on ‘apes called Sex Life of the _ Hall could join PSI, which does cover pre-existing diseases; but like most plans it doesn’t cover the cost of drugs. Yet drugs now ac- count for almost one third of the average man’s medical expenses. I know of a high-school teacher in North York, Ont., suffering from a skin condition, who has paid more than $3,000 over nine years for cortisone and ointment. He has PSI, but it doesn’t cover him. | know of another couple — he’s a Polish-born bakery worker — who had the foresight to buy what they thought was the best plan going. They didn’t foresee her nervous breakdown. Now they spend $13 of their $110-a-week income on drugs. Have these people got “reason- able coverage’? There are various kinds of medical catastrophies, financially crippling, for which it is difficult to get coverage. There’s been a lot of hearty laughter over socialist medical schemes which pay for arti- ficial limbs — but what kind of a fix would you be in if one of your growing children lost a leg? He’d need a new one every year, and. they aren‘t cheap. Yet many plans — PSI is one— don’t cover this. | know of one crippled girl who requires two limbs annually; they're in the $800 range. This family is dependent on the charity of the Shriners. But most people don’t want charity. Like Terry Louth, a Toronto chartered accountant who has suffered through five major operations for an ulcerous condition, they want to pay. It’s true, as the medical association keeps saying, that no needy person has to go without medica! care. But must Canadians be beggared before getting help? The Louths are certainly needy today. They spent all their savings — $3,000 — sold their car, furniture, everything, before accepting wel- fare. Yes, they had a group insurance plan, too. It wasn’t enough. These are extreme cases, but then insurance is supposed to guard against extremes. In health insurance, even this isn’t enough. One of the flaws in most insurance company major medical plans is that because of cleductible clauses they don’t cover normal medical bills — the doctor's house calls, the annual physical checkup. The companies say they want to eliminate small claims. But, for most people, it’s the smail bills that add up to big ones over the year. There is little evidence that those with a vested interest in main- taining the status que have any desire to change it. Premier Robarts of Ontario recently introduced a “medicare” bill which, for all the drum-beating, is little more than a minor amendment to the insurance act. It does not affect those who already have some form of plan and it extends insurance to those who can’t afford it only as a clearly-defined charity, complete with means test. It seems to have been dictated by the doctors, for it bears a suspicious resemblance to the recommendations made three months earlier by the Ontario Medical Association. If the medical profession can come up with a privately admin- istered scheme that gives the kind of coverage the British people enjoy, well and. good. If they can’t, then we ought to get on with the business of socialized medicine as quickly as possible. You can’t manipulate statistics forever. You can’t maintain day in and day out the pleasant pretense that everything is grand when it obviously isn’t. Let the doctors and their friends put up or let them shut up. But let them stop hoodwinking the public. Reprinted by courtesy of MACLEAN’S MAGAZINE IWA PLANT COMMITTEE and Shop Stewards at the North Canadian Forest Products Plywood plant in Grande Prairie, Alberta. Group seated left to right: Irvine Mayer, Secre- tary, Plant Committee; Mrs. Margaret Toew, John Peebles, Chairman, Plant Committee; second row: Anthony Deutch, Orville Christensen, Louis Gallant, Kenneth Lawrence; back