Pretectitlinemas 18 lh be ek I oF pf May Brown, Bruce Yorke and chairperson Rosalyn Kunin discussed City taxation policies Monday, but mayor Jack Volrich refused to show up for the debate. —Fred Wilson photo Yorke wins taxes debate as Brown blunders facts COPE mayoralty candidate Bruce Yorke and TEAM candidate May Brown debated Vancouver taxation policies Monday and Yorke was the easy winner, clobbering Brown over her proposal to lower industrial taxes in the city and raise homeowner taxes. Brown’s argument that her policy would not result in higher homeowner taxes was discredited by wrong information about in- dustrial taxes she used to back up her position. Brown claimed that her proposal would not result ina $36 per year average increase in homeowner taxes because total industrial taxes to the city amounted to only $5 million per year. The five percent drop in the assessment base of industrial property she advocated could not possibly amount to that much money, she argued. “J’m shocked that the chairman of the finance committee could be so ignorant of the facts,” Yorke responded, ‘“She’s out by a factor of three.” Yorke held up an official document from the city finance department which listed industrial taxes in 1977 at over $15 million. It was the city finance director, Peter Leckie, who provided the in- formation that the proposed reduction in industry taxes would cost homeowners an average of $36, Yorke said, ‘‘and as chairman of the finance committee, she should know that.” The debate was held at a lun- cheon meeting of the Association of Professional Economists in the Hotel Georgia and chaired by Statistics Canada economist Rosalyn Kunin. Kunin had invited mayor Jack Volrich to participate as well, but received no response from the mayor. Volrich’s absence prompted a blast from Yorke who charged a “credibility gap” with the mayor. ‘He has refused to debate anything, with anybody, anywhere,”’ Yorke said. ‘‘At any meeting he comes to he always asks for permission to speak first saying he has _ pressing engagements elsewhere — never Housing crisis rema In spite of an apparant glut on B:C.’s housing market and a slight improvement in the vacancy rate for rental accomodation, there is still a drastic shortage of housing in B.C.’s urban centres, an in- formation paper released by the Communist Party maintained this week. The position paper, produced by the party’s municipal affairs committee, contends that there is overproduction for only high priced luxury accomodation while at the same time there is ‘“‘an in- creasing shortage of housing for those most in need of it — the poor and young working class families.” Evidence of the fact that there is still a drastic shortage of housing is given by the apartment vacancy rate in early summer 1978, the paper said, in which the Greater Vancouver Real Estate Board put the vacancy rate at 1.5 percent for metropolitan Vancouver, at 1.2 percent in the city of Vancouver and at .09 percent in Burnaby. The vacancy rate for two and three bedroom family type ac- comodation is still well below one percent anywhere in the region, it said, “which is not significantly different from what it was four years ago at the peak of the recognized housing crisis.” The private house market has large stocks of unsold houses, it said, but these are exclusively in the mid to high price luxury markey ‘‘which developers con- tinue to think is the only market that exists to be satisfied.” House prices increased only a little during 1977, but there will be larger increases this year and interest rates will also approach 12 percent, making it more difficult for low income families to enter the market. : “The demand for housing has not subsided since 1974, but has been frustrated by the decline in the development of low cost and public housing,”’ it said. Combined with the failure of developers to provide the housing most in demand and with high unemployment and reduced real earnings of working people, a situation has been created where ‘“‘the housing con- ditions of those who need new housing are deteriorating and the GVRD accreditation fight scheduled for November A key battle in the fight to prevent municipalities in the Greater Vancouver Regional District from joining an ac- creditated employers group which would bargain with municipal employees has been scheduled for November 21 when the matter goes to Vancouver city council for consideration. The Canadian Union of Public Employees which is opposed to the scheme and has warned that ac- creditation would remove autonomy of local councils to deal with their employees and lead to __region wide lockouts, asked council to defer a decision on the GVRD task force proposal until next year. But Tuesday, council voted to decide on the issue November 21 — a meeting when alderman Harry Rankin, the most outspoken defender of CUPE’s position, will be on vacation. “Vancouver is key to the issue,”’ CUPE regional director Len Stair told the Tribune Wednesday, “Other municipalities are waiting to see what happens here.” So far only Delta and Burnaby have debated the issue, Stair said, with Burnaby unanimously rejecting the idea. When Vancouver council decides on the issue some of the aldermen may be defeated and other elected aldermen may not be able to debate the issue, Stair said, “They have no mandate to hand over autonomy in bargaining with their employees to some other groups.’ Stair said that the union will consider accreditation an open matter even though mayor Jack Volich is a member of the GVRD task force; recommended it. “Tn Burnaby, councillors from both sides of the political fence had enough sense to see that this would create nothing but trouble and that their ability to deal with their employees would be taken away. They had a unanimous vote and if sense prevails in Vancouver it will be the same,” he said. ins, contends CP number of families living in basement suites is rapidly in- creasing.” : The nub of the problem, the CP said, is that there have been no outstanding public housing developments in B.C. during the past four years. Where either regional districts or municipalities participated in some form of public housing or assisted in private housing development, ‘“‘it was either insignificantly small or a dismal failure.” The federal Central Mortgage and Housing Corporation still offers a number of assistance programs for provinces and municipalities to engage in public housing programs, although the assistance is reduced from what was available a few years ago. Assistance is also difficult because in many cases provincial in- volvement is necessary, and the Socreds would be an obstacle even if the municipalities were eager to get involved. In fact, the provincial government is busy divesting itself of the land banks and public housing developments already built up over the past eight years, the paper pointed out. In spite of the problems with the provincial government and_ the CMHC, the CP said, action at the municipal level remains one of the most effective routes to provide affordable housing. For municipalities prepared to take action, it said, “the only practical solution remains for municipalities “to establish housing corporations for public development and con- struction of low cost, non profit housing.”’ applications for development permits. SAM is making uncontrolled development a campaign issue, calling for strict controls on new developments in Surrey. stated of course — I submit that Volrich’s refusal to take part in this debate shows contempt for the Association -of Professional Economists and the public at large.” Ironically, Brown chose as the theme of her address the question “who pays” while calling for a reduction in industrial taxes in line with the controversial recom- mendations of city finance director Leckie and supported by the big business dominated city economic advisory council. Brown also threw her support to the proposal of the Board of Trade to gradually eliminate the business tax which she admitted amounted to $20 million per year. ; Yorke charged that Brown had been ‘“‘sandbagged’’ by her ad- visors and ever since making public statements supporting tax breaks for industry has been “desperately trying to regroup.” “She is now trying to say that her acquiessence in the Board of Trade’s proposals will not result in any increase in homeowner taxes — and that instead she would cut services,’ Yorke said, “But I submit that May Brown knows that there is no fat at all in the city budget, and it is simply not possible to cut services without it costing the city more in taxes in the long run.” If the Board of Trade proposals were implemented, of which Brown’s proposals are similar, homeowner taxes would rise by about $200 per year per home, Yorke argued. Industrial properties in Van- couver are not being ‘‘hit hard’”’ as Brown suggested, said Yorke, but benefit from inequalities in the property tax system. He cited underassessment of large in- dustrial properties, absence of a machinery tax for general tax purposes and the ability of business to deduct property taxes from federal and provincial in- come taxes as examples. Yorke also called for a graduated business tax such as that of Winnipeg where small business is taxed at a low rate of 6 percent and large business at a high rate of 14.5 percent. The proposal would benefit Van- couver’s 11,915 small businesses at the expense of the remaining 3,287 large businesses with an average cut of $144 for each small business. COPE’s tax policies would not force business out of the city, Yorke argued, because ‘‘business and commerce want to locate here.” If Volrich and Brown’s tax policies were implemented it would leave the buying public “even less disposable income to purchase the goods and services produced here,” he said. Baker may win in New West. Carpenters’ Union business agent and New Westminster and District Labor Council secretary Tom Baker is confident that he will be the first labor spokesman in some years to win a seat on the New Westminster city council. Baker rates his chances as good in his bid for one of three alder- manic seats in New Westminster with only two incumbents running. In 1977 Baker fell only 31 votes short of election. Also running for alderman in New Westminster is British Columbia Government Employees Union labor council delegate Chris Sargent. It is Sargent’s first crack at council. PACIFIC TRIBUNE—November 10, 1978—Page 13 a An came cama sesecaane gt