Review . iheainst the declared will of the _ people of Vancouver, Pre- mier W. A. C. Bennett refuses 0 allow Sunday sports. One year ago, by a substan- al majority, Vancouver citi- ens indicated their desire for a Moderate program of Sunday sports. This despite an inten- ive and well-financed campaign orces, in-which the Social Credit “sacred cow’’ gave out with any approving moos. i During the recent meeting be’ tween Mayor Fred Hume (who Hbelieves the people should get peat they voted for) and Pre- Pacific Tribune Published weekly at Room 6 — 426 Main Street Vancouver 4, B.C. Phone: MArine 5288 Editor — TOM McEWEN Associate Editor — HAL GRIFFIN Business Manager — RITA WHYTE Subscription Rates: One Year: $4.00 Six months: $2.25 Canadian and Commonwealth countries (except Australia): $4.00 pne year. Australia, United States and all other countries: $5.00 one year. EDITORIAL PAGE Official emblem of British Columbia, which marked its 85th birthday as a province of Canada Canada on July 20. is now the dogwood flower, from the species of dogwood found only in lower Vancouver Island and along the opposite mainland coast. Ironically—in a sense symbolical mier- Bennett, the Socred chief is quoted as saying: “‘I told the mayor I was leader of the peopie in a democracy and believed in carrying out the will of the people ... But... asa leader I had to give some leadership, and of the sellout of the province’s natural resources to the U.S. — the place where the emblem is most prominently displayed is the center of Vancouver, at Granville and Georgia — in a Coca-Cola neon sign. Bennett defies people's will in that regard, I oppose all forms of commercial Sunday sports.” In other words, the people may vote how they like, but Bennett doesn’t recognize any democratic majority expression of the people on any issue if he is opposed to it. Comment The ‘open door’ N elected board of control should be directly respon- sible to the voters. The appoint- ed “‘board’’, which is now trying to function at Vancouver City Hall is responsible only to the city council which sired it. This is what is wrong with the new setup in government. The only thing this Non- Partisan--appointed board is certain to do is to add to the tax burdens of already over- burdened taxpayers. While much ado is being made about the necessity of this board keeping the “‘door open’”’ for the hearing and adjustment of public requirements ih vari ous civic departments, to citi- zens this “‘door’’ will closely re- semble that of the immortal Omar Khayyam, where sup- plicants could have “. . . great Vancouver's civic ‘argument about it and about, but evermore come out by the same door’ as in they went. Vancouver needs a_ truly representative: city council and an elective board of control, both responsible to and repre- sentative of the people. The new board only tightens the con- trol the big business-dominated NPA already exercises over civic affairs. by the blue-law-holier-than-thou Tom McEwen HAT august journal which gives weekly expression to the hopes and fears of big busi- ness in this country, the Finan- cial Post, is allergic to feather beds. For that matter so am I, despite their soft downy comfort and the odd _ quill, breaking ‘through to irritate a tender spot. The Post’s feather beds how- ever, relate to the realm _ of maximum profits and have little to do with the pleasure of com- fortable sleeping — unless of course one happens to be in the coupon-clipping fraternity. With the steady automation of our railways through conversion from steam to diesel, the Post just cannot see the need of two workers on the head-end, an en- gineer and a “fireman.” Echoing the big railway magnates; it de- clares that such “are no longer necessary on most diesel loco- motives, which, so far as fuel handling is concerned, are vir- tually automatic.” To the organ of big business, a fireman on a diesel locomotive ~ is the equivalent of a “feather bed” for the unions, much too soft, much too easy, and most important to the coupon clippers, much to expensive. “We never could afford feather-bedding in this country,” complains the Post as it recoils horror-stricken at its own cal- culations of thé firemen’s “feath- er-bedding costing the CPR alone more® than $12 million a year.” As a means of discouraging feather beds, the Post would have the railways “reclassify the job of firemen at a third less wages,” or dispense with the feather-bed entirely, thereby ef- fecting an enormous “saving.” Entirely aside from the addi- - tional strain and hazard of one lone worker pulling trains across a continent with a push-button locomotive, the Post is scarcely an impartial advocate for the abo- lition of feather beds, real or imagined. Its weekly features of the vast profits and dividends of great corporations shows the greatest accumulation of “feather beds” in the history of our times. Con- veniently skipping that fact however, the Post reaches out to deprive the railroader of his sag- ging matress by the simple ruse of describing it as a “feather bed.” And, as usual when the Post’s editors get warmed up to their job, they shed crocodile tears for the CPR and the poor “family” taxpayer, in having to keep railroad firemen supplied with “feather beds ” * * * If you are thinking of getting the wife a new fur coat for Christmas this year (cash or in- stallments), get your first fur quotations from Jack Johnson, a trapper friend of mine up Tele- graph Creek way. The margin between what he receives for the finest B.C. mink, beaver or fox and the price you'll pay for that coat, would buy a boxcar load of Post “feather beds.” No wonder the Post doesn’t like “feather. beds” — for work- ers. July 27, 1956 —PACIFIC TRIBUNE — PAGE 7% ive Cee ne eee ee SCOR CHT MNT TUTIT VMI TOIT VANHHANT Muy WHT oa | mm