/12. April 14th, 1975 Seconded by Alderman Ranger: That By-law No. 1367 be read a third time. Carried. Alderman Traboulay voted against the resolution. Prior to passage of the foregoing resolution, Alderman Traboulay referred to a policy adopted by the Council last year dividing the City into three specific areas with the aim of regulating growth, and pointed out that on March 10th of this year the policy was changed to permit certain properties in the RS-2 (One-Family Suburban Residential) area to be rezoned to RS-1 (One~Family Residential), which he felt was a violation of the previous policy. The City Clerk then advised with respect to the "Perth Street Plan 25135 Highway Exchange By-law, 1975, No. 1368" that the same had been advertised as required and that no comments had been received thereon. Moved by Alderman Laking: Seconded by Alderman Keryluk: That By-law No. 1368 be reconsidered, finally passed and adopted. Carried, Alderman Mabbett introduced a By-law to amend the "Traffic Regulation By-law, 1971, No. 1117". Moved by Alderman Mabbett: Seconded by Alderman Laking: That By-law No. 1371 be read a first time. Prior to the question being called on the foregoing proposed resolution, a discussion ensued, and Alderman Laking pointed out that the proposed By-law would eliminate a large portion of the PoCo Tr..il for use by horses and vehicles, and in order to prevent it from growing over, maintenance costs will increase. Moved by Alderman Ranger: Seconded by Alderman Traboulay: That the proposed "Traffic Regulation By-law, 1971, No. 1117, Amendment By-law, 1975, No. 1371", limiting the use of the PoCo Trail to that of a pedestrian walkway, be referred back to the Leisure Activities Committee for review. Carried. NEW BUSINESS: Leisure Act.Comn. From the Leisure Activities Committee, April llth, 1975, advising re sale of beer - lacrosse games that the new Senior "B" Lacrosse Team and the PoCo Saints Lacrosse Team at Rec.Centre have asked that they be allowed to sell beer in the Young Room during their games, and that both organizations have checked with the R.C.M.P. who have no objections.