“HE Communist parties re- gard the struggle for peace as their foremost task. They will do all in their power to prevent : the repr sentativ the Communis Socialist states declaration written in Moscow November 14-16. Then representatives, together with those from Com- war, sala i, Sarg these munist parties in 52 other States, issued a special peace manifesto appealing to people to support efforts to end the arms race, and to win an unconditional lear weapons, and of military blocs and bases on ban on the endins foreign soil. (The Communist party of the United States was not) among those present. Although every other democratic coun- restrictions on try places passports, U.S. is an ex- ception to rule.) In addition, Nikita Khru chev, the Union Com- munist party’: again offered the United States and the capitalist world a new irst secretary, “We do have the ICBM (In- tercontinental B: Mis- Sile), bu you in the name of and of the Communist party, we will nev- er use it against the United States unless the United States starts things first, or if a United attacks man Hearst press’ team ed by editor-in-chief Randolph Hearst. “We dex ——excuse me expres production and kind of televisions vacuum Cc cle Ss. such a war. We over the n States,” Khrushchev United continued “The States the fielc tion. We o the United the IBCM, but in oi peace.ime proauc- 1 relent] 1 this reientl In this and it wi orove superi- ority of system. We want.to win over the United States not in arms but in the production of commodities. We, Want to win in housing, con- struction, food, improvements ed to the people. ods, more , services render- “You have a higher stand- ard of living in the United States. After all, you started years earlier than us. But we will win. We will outstrip the United States. And it will be this that will convince the peo- ple that we are right.” Khrushchev’s remarks fol- lowed the 12-party declaration and the 64-party peace appeal which were drawn up by the Communist who had come to Moscow to join in celebrating 40:h anniver- sary of the founding of the leaders the call for last Nikita Khrushchev with state. Soviet S ate- the three ments gave the world the first Together, rounded-out picture since the 20th Congress of the Soviet Communist party in February of 1956 of today’s world as it appears to the leaders of Com- ist parties in countries dif- widely in economic and developmen‘, and in back- ical poli cultura! grounds. and historic But the statements, although emphasizing the realization of peaceful coexistence as_ the number one goal and task of every Communist party, ceived a negative response from the official quarters of some capi'alist countries, es- pecially the United States. Vice-president Richard M. Nixon, speaking to the Nation- al Council of Catholic Youth in Philadelphia, charged the 64-party peace appeal shows that the Soviet Union is launching a “massive non-mil- itary offensive aimed at the over'hrow of all free govern- ments.” Nixon reflected U.S. official disappointment that the meet- ing of Communist laeders had re- By JOHN PITTMAN resulted in agreement, instead of the dissension and _ strife predicted as an afterma‘h of the 20th Congress and the al- leged disclosures by Khrush- chev of the mistakes and the crimes against socialism of Joseph Stalin. (The Yugoslav representatives declined to sign the 12-party declaration because of disagreement, ac- cording to the Yugoslav am- basador to the U.S., but Yugoslavia joined the other 63 parties in. the peace appeal.) Vice-president Nixon inter- preted the agreement among the Communist leaders not as logical conciusions growing out of a common application of Marxism to the specific con- ditions in their own countries, but as proof that “ru h’ess control and domination of the Communist governments and Communist parties everywhere by the men in the Kremlin will again be the order of the day.” “The dictators of Moscow will sharply step up their eco- nomic, psychological and sub- versive activities all over the world,” Nixon declared. But while attacking the 64- party peace appeal, the Re- Czechoslovakian workers. Communist parties ng peace publican presidential hopeful based his arguments on the 12- party declaration, which had specified that “the fraternal parties not present at this meeting wiil assess and them- selves decide what action they should take on the considera- tions expressed in the declara- iion.” The 12-party representa- tives had agreed on both an analysis of the current interna- tional situation and a line of action. - “With regard to the greater part of mankind,” the 12-party declaration ‘said, “imperialisin has lost its one-time domina- tion. In the imperialist coun- tries society is rent by deep- going class contradictions and by antagonisms between those countries, while the working class is putting up increasing resistance to the policy of im- perialism and the monopolies, fighting for better conditions, democratic rights, for peace and socialism. “In our epoch world devel- opment is determined by the course and results of the com- petition between two diamet- rically opposed social systems. In the past 40 years socialism has demonstrated that it is a ‘nuch higher social system than capitalism. It has ensured development of the productive forces at a rate unprecedented and impossible for capitalism, and the raising of the material and cultural levels of the working people “However, in the greater part of the capitalist world, particularly in the colonial and dependent countries, mil- lions of working people still live in poverty.” From this: analysis they had developed the conclusion that? “The question of war or peace- ful coexistence is now the cru- cial question of world policy. All the nations must display the utmost vigilance in regard to the war danger created by imperialism.” Then followed the action statement: “The meeting con- siders that in the present situ- ation the strengthening of the unity and fraternal co- operation of the Socialist coun- tries, the Communist and Workers’ parties, and the sol- idarity of the international working class and national lib- eration movements ~ acquire special significance.” Nixon’s interpretation of this statement folowed the tradi- tional view among the govern- ments of capitalist countries. “They will emphasize again,” he said, “the popular front tac- ics which fooled so many well-intentioned people in the past.” Reportedly, the French gov- ernment reacted in a similar negative fashion. A Paris dis- patch said the Communist leaders’ statements wad been dismissed as “old hat.” But not everyone in official positions in the capitalist coun- tries was disposed ta pooh- pooh the statements. The Hearst papers published re- ports alongside the Khrush- chev interview attributing to “Western diplomats” the view that the interview had helped — “elear up the troubled air be- tween East and West.” However, official policy in the U.S. and in the leading capitalist countries, especially those affiliated to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and its system of military al- liances, seemed bent on -in- tensifying the arms race in an effort to achieve parity with the Soviet Union in the missile field. The Communist parties’ peace appeal and Khruschev’s offer seemed to represent long- term policy, however, nourish- ing the hope and strengthening — the effort in all countries for veaceful coexistence. ® Full text of the Communist parties’ appeal has been published by the CANA- DIAN TRIBUNE as a sup- plement, and will be available here shortly. December 13, 1957 — PACIFIC TRIBUNE—PAGE 10 —