on 4 Terrace Revie Hospital fees | ‘may be gone '? w— Wednesday, December 31, 1986 eo. ~ by spring 1987 TERRACE — Mills Memorial Hospital ad-. ministrator Norm Carelius said recently the elimina-' © tion of user fees at the - Terrace hospital would have a positive effect on hospital operations by making life simpler for the bookkeeping staff. Carelius said the primary _ difficulty in the user fee structure, which levies charges of $10 for emergency service and $8.50 per day for hospital in-patients, is the extra ‘ paperwork the system creates and problems in collecting fees from discharged patients. He expressed concern, - however, about replacing the lost operating revenue from the fees. Although ‘he was unable to specify the dollar value collected through fees, Carelius said the provincial government will have to make up the ‘loss through additional Ministry of Health fun- ding. ‘‘I hope they do so in an expeditious manner, with no hiatus that would leave us in a deficit posi- logking ,at ways tion,’’ he said. Premier Vander Zalm recently announced the B.C, government will be of : abolishing* the fee struc- ture by the end of March - 1987. In an interview from Victoria, Ian Smith, an in- formation officer for the Ministry of Health, ex- plained that the date is a vst ite Terrace Review Established May 1, 1985 The Terrace Review is published each Wednesday by Close-Up Business Services Ltd. Publisher: Mark Twyford Editer: Maureen Barbour Staft Reporter: Michael Kelly Advertising Sales: Jean-Luc Roy 635-7840 Production: . Kim Kimble Office: ’ Carrle Clson Accounting: Marj Twytord ‘Second-class mail . registration No. 6896. Reproduction of this paper or any por- ' = dion thereof is prohibited without per- mission of the publisher. 4535 Greig Avenue, Terrace, B.C. V8G 1M7 Phone: 635-7840 po loss revenues. Canada Health Act, Smith deadline stipulated by the Canada Health Act. The Canada Health Act was passed by the federal government in July 1984, and one of its provisions is that federal health care transfer payments will be withheld from any pro- vince which charges user ' fees for hospital services. Smith said the amount withheld corresponds dollar-for-dollar-. to the amount collected by the province in fees. The money, which will total about $85 million by the end of March, is currently being held in trust by Ot- tawa, but if the B.C. government fails to act on the user fee situation by the March deadline the opportunity to recover that money will be lost. Smith said the an- nouncement concerning elimination of. the fees originated in the Premier’s office, and the Ministry of Health has not received details of how hospital financing would be: restructured around the of the user fee Before the said, the province had the benefit of revenues from ‘both user fees and federal transfer payments; when Ottawa began holding back transfer payments, the B.C. government tack- ed the shortfall onto the provincial deficit rather than reducing the health care budget. The $85: million owing to the pro- vince, he said, will go into the general revenue fund and not directly into health care. B.C. residents presently pay for hospital operating costs through provincial income taxes, federal in- come taxes and user fees, Regional Hospital District taxation. provides for capital costs and equip- ment replacement, and premiums paid to the Medical Services Plan are applied against physi- cians’ fees. Hospital user fees pro- vide the government with about two percent of the annual $1.5 billion health care budget. Smith was unable to speculate whether taxes or medical plan premiums will go up as a result of eliminating the fees. ‘‘It remains to be seen how the shortfall will be made up,’ he said. , yu 5 ST < S BC GT LOUOR STORE WSO WILL WE CONSIDER AN OFFER. ‘Stop waiting for premier Vander Zalm to ‘self destruct By now, it should have become clear to the NDP and all other interested parties that Premier Vander Zalm- isn’t about to self-destruct. Fond hopes in various quarters that the premier of past foot-in-the-mouth disease will have a relapse have been dashed by a Vander Zalm most people didn’t see before. ; Not that I ever expected Vander Zalm, the premier, to behave as outrageously as Vander Zalm, the cabinet - minister. 1 didn’t and J got columns to prove it. But a lot of people did, and they are now somewhat hard-pressed to explain why Vander Zalm hasn’t tripped over his tongue yet. Oh, there have been a couple of close calls. In the case of the touch-and-go lumber tariff negotiations, Vander Zalm announced a settlement when there was none. But he backtracked fast and, in my opinion, quite convinc- ingly. His foray into the movie business was also potentially disastrous. Not that there is anything illegal-or immoral about his role in the Dutch fairy tale movie, featuring our premier flying to Canada on a rainbow. The danger here is ridicule, the most lethal of all traps for a politi- cian, Yet, he escaped unharmed. . Aside from these and a couple of other minor stumbles, however, Vander Zalm has managed to avoid all pitfalls, and his political adversaries are asking: how come? The answer is simple. His adversaries have under- estimated his political acumen: Vander Zalm is a con- -summate politician, always has been, He has the ability - to assess the mood of the public and say exactly what a great majority wantsto hear, Let's look at a few examples. When Vander Zalm was a cabinet minister, he once said that public servants weren't worth the money they get. At best, he said, they delivered three days’ work for five days’ pay. When an employee of his ministry criticized. him for his remarks,. reporters asked Vander Zalm what he thought of a public servant chastising a minister. Vander Zalm replied there was room in his ministry for people who criticized him — room in Fort St. John, room in Fort Nelson, room in Atlin, Except for government employees, the public loved it. Public-servant bashing has always been a favorite pastime in British Columbia, next only to union- bashing. Anyone taking on the bureaucrats is assured of support. His remark that welfare recipients be given shovels-to earn their keep was equally successful. There are a hell Hubert Beyer Terrace Review Victoria Correspondent 7 of a lot more people working than are on welfare, and it’s not very difficult to appeal to their baser instincts, one of which rules the pocket book, But his political opponents have waited in vain for Vander Zalm to give similar performances as premier, and they will continue to wait in vain. Nobody knows better than the premier that he cannot afford to be a verbal scatter gun in his present position. His political instinct turns on warning lights all over the place whenever he wanders too close to an open man- hole. That instinct served him well during the election cam- paign. He only said the things the public wanted to hear, not those his opponents wanted him to say. When Vander Zalm took the Socreds into the last campaign, the public had had a belly-full of political rhetoric. For years; Bill Bennett had told them that good times were just.around the corner, if only they made the sacrifices demanded of them by restraint. They made the sacrifices all right, but the promised good times never came. Things got worse instead, At one point, BC’s unemployment was second only to that of Newfoundland. That’s why Vander Zalm didn’t talk about specifics, giving us Vander Zalm, the quiet and reflective statesman instead, And again, his instinct didn’t let him down. His over- whelming victory was proof that the last thing the public wanted was more of the same old political rhetoric. And — as I said at the outset, he has used that same political in- stinct to stay out of trouble since the election. All of which would make it seem like a good idea if the NDP quit waiting for Vander Zalm to dig his own political grave, and came up, instead, with a few ideas of their own to defeat the Socreds in the next election, or the one after, or the one after that. Letters to the editor will be considered for publication only whan signed. Please include your phone number. The editor reserves the right to condense and edit fetters. Opinions expressed aré not necessarily those of the Terrace Review. .- - BUCKLE UP! Seat belts save lives. NT a eb ET i L, i i \