By ALD. HARRY RANKIN If anyone in West Vancouver (or anywhere else on the North Shore) thinks the Third Crossing isn’t going to cost them anything or at least not very much, he should get a peek at the Report on Transportation Planning for West Vancouver, prepared by Wooster Engineering. Presented to West Vancouver Municipal Council on January 29, 1971, the report has not, as far as I’ve been able to find out, been made public. One can't ‘help but wonder why. But this becomes clearer when the report is examined. N. D. Lea & Associates and Swan ancouver Mayor Tom ‘‘Terrific’’ Campbell has suf- fered another relapse, this time a real bad one. This ‘third crossing’ over Burrard Inlet was just too much for the mayoral brain, (or what passes for such?) to take. Hence his latest explosion, unparalled since the days of the late and unlamented U.S. Senator Joe McCarthy. To parody Karl Marx on the Tom ‘‘Terrific’”’ latest mental diarrhea anent a democratic-minded citizenry, a brand new revised slogan has sprouted: ‘“‘Hamburgers and rangitangs unite, you have nothing to lose but your freeways, you have a rapid transit to win.”’ : A ‘‘thamburger’’, in the demented jargon of Tom “Terrific? is a citizen minus a university degree, while a “rangitang’’ could be one with such a degree, but no job in sight, hence no status. That of course covers an awful lot of citizens, who, unlike out recently-appointed “‘Q.C.” (read ‘‘queer character’’), have not yet qualified for a padded cell in the local squirrel cage. ; “If this third crossing sinks,’ quoth Thomas the Terrible, “it will be a great victory for the Communist Party of Canada.”’ Naturally the commercial press gave these mayoral ravings the widést coverage, since anti-Communist bilge, whatever its source, is ever and always ‘“‘news’’ for the brainwashed newshawks and their Establishment paymasters. It is also the ‘last refuge”’ of the political nonentity who chafes at the democratic restrictions which curbs his yearning for a class dictatorship. Should the people of Vancouver and surrounding municipalities, ‘‘hamburgers’’, ‘‘rangitangs’’ and all, win a plebiscite to help determine what is good and beneficial for this and future generations, that indeed will be a victory for the Communist Party — and countless thousands of other non- communist citizens; a victory for the progress of Vancouver, and a victory over the NPA would-be dictators at City Hall. When the Communist “‘line’’ can only be met with insult, slander and ephitet, in a sickly attempt to stifle and gag all opposition to NPA—Big Business dicktat, that also gives added emphasis to the validity and correctness of that ‘‘line.’’ The recurrent anti-Communist mental hemorrhages of Tom ‘Terrific’? and his ilk, merely illustrate the insoluable dilemma of a class ‘‘whose time has come.” : * * * The auditorium of the John Oliver School in Vancouver was packed to capacity. They had come to hear Sallye Davis, mother of Dr. Angela Davis, plead for the life and freedom of her loved, and world-loved daughter — against the ruthless frame-up and contemplated murder at the hands of U.S. reaction. (See coverage of meeting on Pg. 11.) Out on the sidewalk about a dozen misguided youths walked up and down, carrying a big swastika flag and sundry erudely-drawn slogans, some of which read: ‘‘We stand for white power’’. These elements were there for the sole purpose, (if possible) to disrupt the assembled gathering. There were no police in sight, but this meeting ‘‘policed”’ its own security and its honored guests against any unforeseen eventualities. As we have said, it was a big meeting, an interested and enthusiastic audience, and a very sacred cause — the saving of a Black woman and a Communist from frame-up and death at the hands of the killers of Sacco and Vanzetti, the Rosenbergs, Joe Hill and hundreds of other workingclass martyrs, sacrificed on the U.S. altar of Mammon. But the commercial press were not there. For them there was no “‘news in a frail little Black mother proclaiming the innocence and seeking the freedom of her (and our) Angela. Big meeting and all, the kept press gave it. the full blackout treatment. Not a line. But ... had the handful of Nazi hooligans with their swastika bedecked flag and racist slogans managed to get in to do their assigned job of disruption and worse, that would have been ‘‘news*; that would have got the headlines. and the ‘“‘cops’’ speedily arrived from nowhere — to impose “law-'n- order’’ — with the assembled guests and audience as their prime target. Then the “free press’ would have given its readers a real thriller that would have matched Mayor Campbell’s dementia. We thank Sallye Davis — and all the mothers of the world. who fight against terrible odds, for the lives and freedom of their Angelas. In their victory we also win! . The report makes clear that PACIFIC TRIBUNE—FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 18, '1972—PAGE 2 the development and popu- lation growth (and by this it obviously means the real estate development and the popula- tion explosion that would follow) in West Vancouver is predicated on a Third Crossing which is “assumed as_ being com- mitted.” It predicts a_ population growth of West Vancouver from its present 37,000 to 60,000 or 91,000 in the next 15 years, depending upon what sort of development scheme is adopt- ed. It further predicts that the minimum cost of ‘‘arterial street improvement” to serve the freeways (such as a Third Crossing and the Upper Levels Highway) will be $5 million (at 1970 prices) and perhaps as high as $8-$10 million. It spells out that this excludes ‘‘routine improvements, maintenance and local development costs and interest,’ all of which would be extra. It declares that the “‘new arteries to deliver traffic to the proposed - Brockton Point Crossing,’’ will ‘determine the base network for the foreseeable ‘future.’’ And it claims (no doubt again on behalf of the real estate promoters) that any failure to build a Third Crossing would be a factor ‘‘limiting further devel- opment” in the municipality. Two things at least become clearer than ever from this * report. One is that the main propo- nents of the Third Crossing are the real estate promoters and their political representatives ~The high cost of Third Crossing on municipal councils, who want -to bring about giant devel- opment schemes on the North Shore that will make it even more crowded and congested than the,downtown area of Van- couver. : Another is that the Third Cross- ing will not solve any traffic: problems and is not really intended to. The real estate development that will take place following the building of a Third Crossing will bring with it an increase in population and an increase in cars that would immediately negate the temporary alleged benefit that the Third Crossing might bring. “And then the people of the North Shore won’t just be back where they started, they'll be worse off. The demand will then arise for a fourth, fifth and sixth crossing, for more arterial roads, for more freeways. Sooner or later (I should really say, before it is too late) we must all face up to the fact that freeways do not solve problems — they create them. A freeway System feeds on itself with monstrous results. To promote freeways is madness. There is only one solution and that is public transit, starting with an improved bus system and light rapid transit, and proceeding on to full rapid transit at a later date. Those mayors and aldermen on the North Shore, in Van- couver and other municipalities in the Regional District who push freeways are playing a dangerously shortsighted game. OF A DICTIONARY © DEFINITION “HAMBURGER: “A bum or tramp: anyone who is down and out ” THE BIGGEST HAMBURGER OF ALL PACIFIC TRIBUNE ‘munity Hall last Sunday. Mos | they will win 29 new readers | MARK MOSHER, leading tra unionist and community work was nominated as Commun candidate for the federal riding ° Comox-Alberni at a constitue! meeting in Parksville C0 is a school trustee in Alber Pledge PT subs i] The Trail Press Club has just informed the PT that to boost the circulation of our |) paper this year. : Other clubs which have | pledged to give leadership in| the battle to win new readers } are Vancouver East, with oa and Victory Square with 2)” pledge to win 22 new readers. We salute these clubs and | urge all press clubs who have |" not yet sent in their pledges | for the year to do so without |” delay. S| More light on Quilt case The Williams Lake Tribute says the priest of the Anahiml Reserve told their reporter lat week that Mrs. Christine Quilty (whose husband died followitky an incident involving the RCMP) came to him two dajsy before the death of her husbaf and asked him to phone a judg because her husband had ‘jumped on’’ by a policeman. — Father John O’Brien said It could not reach the judge by tele phone and that at no time wast called to testify at the inqueés into Quilt’s death. He said he hat expected to be contacted all assumed when he was not that he was not needed. Homeowners say ‘we're heing had!” Homeowners — We:re being Had! says the Central Council of Ratepayers in a leaflet being dis- tributed owners this month. - Assessments on homes are up while on many commercial and industrial properties assess- méhts are down’’, they explain. Last year school taxes amounted to about one-half the revenues raised by property taxes in Van- couver. and the biggest increase was borne by single-family residential homes. while taxes on commercial property de- creased. Bennett's Assessment Equali- zation Act is responsible for this. An amendment to the act limits to 10 percent the increase in assessment for school purposes, so the bigger the to Vancouver home- property, the bigger the decrease in assessment. The Central Council of Rate- payers point out that millions are spent for facilities and services for big developers like Marathon (CPR) Project 200 (CPR), Block 42-52 (Seagrams) Four Season, etc. The city bud- get could be trimmed if this is stopped. Assessments and taxes will not have to increase. TWO MILL RATES The ratepayers group attended ‘a session of city council last week and proposed that the mill rate on residential property be reduced so that taxes remain the same as in 1971: that the mill rate on commiercial’and indus- trial property remain the same. but if additional. revenue is needed the mill rate on thest” properties should be increased. ~ They urged city council t press the provincial govert ment to remove the 10 percell limitation amendment on con mercial and industria properties, and demanded an en to concessions and subsidies t large private concerns. | Due to the opposition homeowners to increaSed taxe on their homes, city council recently decided to ask the pr¢ vincial government to increas? its per capita grant t municipalities by 15 percent. The Central Council of Rate payers urge all homeowners ant renters. to write or phone cit) hall to protest the unjust tax assessments and any increase il taxes. They say tax increas can be stopped if homeowne renters act together. -