een) |e The long awaited World Peace | Congress — Conference on _ Multinationals opens next weekend in Toronto with delegates from 20 different countries attending the meeting at the University of Toronto’s Medical Sciences Building. In a statement from the Con- | ference’s organizing committee the terms of reference for the _ discussion was described as the | ~ “awesome concentration of | €conomic political and military _ Power in the hands of the multi- national corporations.” __ “This conference,” it read, “‘is aimed at untangling in definitive | Way the many myths that have __§rown up around the phenomena of _ the trans global operations of these -Multi-national corporations.. We ' Want to place particular emphasis __ Upon discovering and-exposing the _ tivities of these corporations _ that lead to war. We want to stress € impact of the multi-nationals on. sovereignty and economic ~ Independence.\We want to show __ how the lives of all the people are “affected by the decisions of Multinationals regarding in- _ Yestment, markets, labor forces and resource development.” _ A number of ‘delegates at the _ onference will be from British | Columbia. These will include Bert Ogden who is being sent by the Nanaimo Labor Council, Lillian oney from the Victoria Peace Council and a representative of the B.C. Peace Council. Noted marxist _ €conomist Emil Bjarnason will | Present one of the papers to the _ Conference, entitled ‘‘The Conomics of the Multinationals.”’ A group of three leading members of the World Peace Congress will tour Canada this Week previous to the conference. It Will include Karen Talbot, the orth American representative to the WPC, Jean Schaeffer of the WPC’s Presidential Committee and a member of the Social Council of the Government of France, and aja Ali, an executive member of India’s ruling Congress Party. The three will arrive in Van- “ouver this Thursday and attend a I lic reception in their honor at Sa P.m., Thursday, November 6 the Unitarian Church. N hen the conference opens on may ember 14 it will discuss Multinationals under three main Wordings and in ~- several & tyeshops. Main topies cover the oie “Multinationals and the anyon economic crisis,’ Ultinationals and national in- oS Ndence”’ and ‘Multinationals _ ~~ threat to peace and detente.” 0 addition to those from Canada f the United States delegations the packed from Algeria, Iraq, Cub SSR, Mongolia, Hungary, wa, Venezuela, Costa Rica, Chile . ee a The World Conference on Multinationals (see story below) meeting in Toronto will examine the awesome economic, political and military power in the hands of the multinational corporations. Graphic above shows an artists conception of U.S. Coca-Cola imperialism. Multi-nationals viewed at Toronto conference exiles, India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, France, Federal Republic of Germany, Mozambique, Guinea Bissau and Madagascar. Among the non-governmental organizations. that will be represented are the World Federation of Trade Unions, OPEC, the African National Congress of South Africa and others. : Among the non-governmental organizations that will -be represented are the World Federation of Trade Unions, OPEC, the African National Congress of South. Africa and others. Canadian delegates to the conference will include a number of trade unionists from labor councils and unions such as the Steelworkers, | United. © Auto Workers .and United. Electrical Workers. The CLC will. be represented as well. “There is an alternative to the domination of our lives by these multinationals,”’ the statement of the organizing committee said, ““Wesee this conference not only as a forum for discussion, not only as an-opportunity to add to our un- derstanding of how multinationals operate, but above all this world conference must lay the basis for a concrete planned action on a world scale by the peace forces of the world as an opening step in a campaign to counter the awesome power of these multinational corporations.” S Rankin’s Law scuttles rent controls The recommendations to the provincial government on landlord and tenant legislation have been rejected by the organized tenant movement as steps which ‘‘if adopted, would emasculate the already weak control of rent in- are system that now exists in The proposals were contained in the: report: . of. «the ~°‘‘In- terdepartmental Study Team on Housing and Rents’’ released last week by the attorney general. Although still at the proposal stage, the report received the tacit approval of attorney-general Alec - MacDonald. “That is a landlord report,” asserted British Columbia Tenant Organization president Bruce Yorke in an interview with the Tribune, ‘‘there is barely a thing about it which is supportable.” According to Yorke the proposals would in effect set a minimum allowable rent increase of at least 8 per cent, and more likely in the 12 per cent range, but which Jeaves “the maximum rent increase an open question.” “The report appears to favor control,’ Yorke said, ‘‘But it is so full of exemptions, special cases, considerations for landlords and more, that if it were adopted landlords would rub their hands in glee. “For all practical purposes it scuttles any effective control program from the point of view of tenants, in favor of landlords and their market economy profits. The NDP was elected on a promise to prevent just this.” Yorke charged that.the govern- ment ordered the original and well prepared brief of the study team.to be re-written with the result that the report released by MacDonald is a ‘gross distortion of the original report and represents only the personal prejudices of its members who picked and chose what they wanted-from the original sources and deliberately suppressed vital hard information.” “The. public doesn’t. know “it,” Yorke said, “but the original report was presented to the at- torney general, the premier and the cabinet simultaneously with the submission of the study team’s amended ‘‘version.” “So far the government has refused to release the original, basic and thoroughly documented report. We demand its release so that everyone can judge it against the wholesale butchering it sub- Name Specia With a $6.00 sub you can receive RANKIN’S LAW at ~ ‘the reduced price of $6.00 (reg. $7.95). of the Team who did no research whatsoever — all they did was a re- write job!”’ The original report, he said, stated that one third of existing rents are illegal, that enforcement provisions “are inadequate, and that there is no need for any rent increase beyond 6.4 per cent. It went even further to say that the entire administration should be revamped with authority tran- sferred to a new Rent Review Commission that would have full time landlord and _ tenant representatives. But the original report was re- written to include proposals and loopholes entirely contrary: to the spirit of the first document. Yorke outlined five major loopholes which will have the effect of mass exemptions from any controls at all, even before the “rent increase formula’”’ is ap- plied. : aes The first of these is to set a basic anniversary date of January 1976. “This ‘condones the widespread illegal rents in existence at the present,” Yorke commented, «“‘It: makes a mockery of the law, un- dermines the base of the system, and: legitimatizes. illegal rents.’’ Secondly, the report -proposes that any municipality could exempt itself from the controls. simply through the passing of a by- law in council. Reactionary municipal councils in Surrey, Delta and Coquitlam would jump at the opportunity. Then, all rents which are greater - than $35¢ are to be exempt. Presently those rents over $500 were exempt. ‘ new construction is free from control for five years the Study Team wants that period extended to seven years. “When the proposed rent in- crease ‘formula’ is applied to the rest,’ Yorke said, “the loopholes become yawning chasms.” The rent incréase formula would guarantee 3.5 per cent more for landlords for supposed increasing operating costs and another guaranteed 2.9 per cent for sup- posedly increasing municipal taxes. On top of that landlords would get an additional 1.6 per cent for “protection” against inflation with that figure increasing on a one to one ratio with each percentage point increase in inflation over 8 - per cent. In other words, a 12 per cent increase would mean an additional 5.6 per cent for lan- dlords. . ; “The gravy train doesn’t stop . there though,”’ he stressed, “Any landlord can get more than the 3.5 per cent for operating costs simply by showing that he incurred greater costs. : ‘‘Add to that another gift where a landlord could show that even with all the loopholes his rents are still below the community average for comparable premises he can have all the rents brought forward. In ‘short, all below average rents can be brought up to the average. This could be at least half of all existing rents. : “The terrible bias of the- recommendations is best shown in that there ‘is no mechanism for tenants to apply for lower rent increases where operating cost increases are below 3.5 per cent, or where the resulting rents are higher than the community average. This speaks volumes for the so-called: impartiality of those who put their names to the réport!”” All of the other aspects of the report, -Yorke said, are equally weighted in the landlords’ favor. They include a lack of a: penalty provision for violations of the law, a proposal that the time period for rent increases be reduced from three months to two months, that — there be no posting of rents and no common anniversary dates, that administration should remain a legal one in the hands of the at- torney general rather than a social administration under the housing department and that only token representation to be given to tenants in administrative bodies. Please send: Rankin’s Law fee. (Enclose $12.00) Conscience for Canada Ee (Enclose $9.95) Forge Glows Red cl (Enclose $8.95) To: Mez. 3, 193 E. Hastings, Van., B.C. a i cet PACIFIC TRIBUNE—NOVEMBER 7, 1975—Page 3 _ Renew your sub or buy a new one and we will send you RANKIN’S LAW or your choice of one or either of two other books, also at reduced prices. Pee ae ee Aye re ee ee oe A new sub 24 or renewal i for: — oe woe