TD) ie f Official Publication International Woodworkers of America, B.C. District Council No. 1 Vol, XIV. No. 21. VANCOUVER, B.C., OCTOBER 8, 1945 SS" (854) Parties Asked To Submit Views The following is a statement forwarded to the B.C. Federation of Labor by the CCF Provincial Executive in answer to a resolution calling for labor unity in elections, “The B.C. Federation of Labor has asked this comittee to enter into conversations with officers of the Federation and of the Labor- Progressive Party, with a view to the divi- sion of seats between the two parties at the forthcoming elections, The B.C. Federation of Labor is affiliated with the Canadian Congress of Labor, which at its 1943 national convention and at its lutions referring to the CCF as the “political arm of labor.” The proposal advanced by the B.C. Federation of Labor has not been sup- ported by a referendum yote of a single union local in this province, and indeed the only * union referendums on political policy in this province have resulted in union affiliations with the CCF. i | The adoption of the B.C. Federation pro- posal, if it were to result in the formation of a government, could only lead to a CCF-LPP coalition government, Such a coalition of parties, divided by fundamental differences of policy could only result in the chaos and be- trayal of the interests of the working people of this province, which the CGF avoided when it rejected the invitation of the Liberals and CCF Reply To B.C. Federation . Ze last annual national convention, adopted reso- » Conservative parties to enter into a coalition government in 1941. The Communist Party and its successor, Labor-Progressive Party, have from time to time during the last twelve years advanced similar proposals, and the consideration which the CCF has given to them convinces us that their acceptance can only militate against the development of a political party which faith- fully advances and protects the rightful in- terests of the working ‘people and leads the way forward to a democratic, socialist Canada, by democratic means. The results of the recent federal election prove beyond dispute that the LPP is incap- able of attracting the support of enough voters to elect a candidate, and even if given a free field. Therefore if LPP supporters really wish to bring about the downfall of the capitalist coalition government, they must support CCF candidates. The present election brings forcefully to the attention of labor the reed for labor unity. At the polls the electors must vote for a Coalition government, or a CCF government. We believe that a CCF government will be a truly labor government. It is for those who deny this to show that the CCF in its personnel does not represent the workers of the field, office, and factory. It is for them to show wherein CCF policies betray the in- terests of the working people and wherein by its acts the CCF has failed to serve those interests faithfully and well. The political unity of labor will be achieved in this province by the organized participation of labor in the formation of a CCF government. Federation Officers Dissatisfied With *Discourteous’ CCF Reply ‘The following statement was issued by the officers of the B.C. ——— : Federation of Labor, following receipt:of CCF reply to unity plea:| @ffiliation with any political “Officers of the B.C. Federation of Labor, CCL, express sur-| Patty. prise at the discourteous attitude of the Provincial Executive of The officers of the B.C. Fed- the CCF in their public rejection of the Federation’s proposal for] eration of Labor regret that the labor unity in the forthcoming Provincial election. “The membership of some 70 Congress affiliates of the B.C. | convention tions whatsoever. hundred executive of the GCF have seen fit to reject our Convention pro- oo # recommended that|posal to meet and explore the Federation Labor have vary-|the delegates consider affiliation | possibilities of unity of all Jab ing political affiliations and in|to the CCF, and with the exeep. | PSs ities of unity of all labor many instances no party affilia-|tion of two’ locals out of two . a is in British Columbia, | Such poliey being agreed to, with in the coming Provincial election, “The resolution submitted to | consideration for CCF affiliation | the assistance of the Vice-Presi- our Second Annual Convention} met with disfavor. The Federa- | dent of the Canadian Congress of by a local of the ‘anadian Bro-|tion’s business is conducted by a| Labor, Alex McAuslane, that ‘therhood of Railway Employees, | representative form of govern-| Would guarantee a victory for la- Boilermakers’ & Iron Shipbuild-} ment, namely—elected delegates | or and all progressive forces LPP Replies But CCF Has No Time An effort was made by the officers of B.C. District Council No. 1, IWA-CIO, to present to the members of this union a two-sided discussion on the political: issues fac- ing labor in the coming provincial elections. A letter was sent to the leaders of two political parties claiming to rep- resent labor in B.C., namely, the Cooperative Commonwealth Federation and the Labor-Progressive Party. The Labor- Progressive Party replied to the invitation and their sub- mission is published in this supplement. The following is the letter which was sent to the CCF which is similar to the one to the LPP: Mr. Frank McKenzie, Secretary Cooperative Commonwealth Federation 7th Floor, Holden Bldg. Vancouver, B.C. Dear Sir: At a recent convention of the B.C. Federation of Labor, to which we are affiliated, a resolution was passed on labor unity in elections. We are enclosing a copy of this resolution. In addition to this, the Canadian Congress of Labor in execu- tive session, Ottawa, July 27, 1945, adopted a program, a summary of which is as follows: 1. The need of an immediate national policy on the housing situation which will enable the construction of low rental houses for the people who are néw in need of same.. 2. The need of a nation-wide labor relations code, uni- form in design and principle, to be administered by the Federal Government and to be drafted to conform to the proposals as submitted by the Congress to the Government some months ago. 3. The need of a national minimum wage law. 4. The need of a national basic wage structure. 5. The need of an equitable tax structure that will per- mit the Federal Government to provide for national health, proper old age insurance and all other phases of social security. 6. The need of constitutional amendments to provide that Canada shall be authorized to enforce Conven- tions and recommendations of the Internationa] Labor Organizations, 7, The need of a National Employment’ Service operated by the Federal Government and made responsive to the needs of the people requiring its services. The Editorial Board of our official publication; the “B.C. Lum- ber Worker,” is anxious to present to the membership of the Inter- national Woodworkers of America in B.C., a clear picture of the political issues facing labor in this coming provincial election. In view of this, we are publishing a special supplement in the next issue of our paper, in which we desire to publish the opinions and the stand of your party and the LPP on the above points, including the resolution on unity. We suggest an article of about 8,000 words; and would appreciate having.a copy at this office by Tuesday, October 2. The paper will be published, Monday, Oct. 8 Trusting we may have your cooperation in this, and thanking you, Iam Yours very truly, JACK GREENALL, Secretary. odworkers of America, re-|chartered by the Canadian Con- the unanimous approval] gress of Labor, and working resolutions committee | within the Congress constitution, relative to Provincial Federa- tions, which is the accepted and normal process of the legislative arm of the Congress, Therefore, because of the various partisan opinions of our membership, we cannot be directly connected by ers’ Union, and International |meeting in annual convention, | ®ainst reaction, . Signed on behalf of the B,C. Federation of Labor, CCL, DANIEL O'BRIEN, President. HARVEY MURPHY, ist Vice- President. ALEX McKENZIE, 2nd Vice- President, HAROLD PRITCHETT, Secre- tary-Treasurer. WE APOLOGIZE Editors of the B. C. Lumber Worker regret that circumstances caused this supplement to be one-sided and that it does not contain the broader discussion we had hoped for. Page four was held until the last minute for the CCF. Two days longer than the original deadline. Mr. Mc- Kenzie stated at the last minute that he had been much too busy to prepare a statement. Commitments in the form of advertising sold forced us to go ahead and print the supplement without their submission. |