JACONVENTIONO1 e Al Plamondon, Local 1-405 The ‘Great Bear Rainforest’ nixed It’s time to get rid of the words “Great Bear Rainforest” when referring to the mid-coast no ion of the province, said delegates. The so- called “Great Bear Rainforest” is a term invented by the environmentalist and has been used repeatedly by the media as a de facto reference. Local 1-417 delegate Marty Gibbons from Salmon Arm said that his community got a visit from a group of characters promoting preservation of the mid-coast area. “They bring a bus around, the “Great Bear Rainforest” salute, and they have pictures of loggers slaughtering trees, and basically it really concerns me that this “Great Bear Rainforest” is catching on, and it really is. The press is referring to it,” he said. Local 2171’s Gary Kobayashi:said his local has been victimized by mythological and romantic concepts that the green movement has been able to sell worldwide. He said working forest areas have been lost to spotted owls, marmots and now bears. “You know they (green groups) are good at this type of thing and I guess we fall into the trap of using their terminology sometime,” said the speaker. Al Plamondon of Local 1-405 said near Kaslo, in the B.C. southeastern Interior, greens have named an area the “Singing Forest.” He said greens are trying to get a wildlife corridor extended from Idaho, through Washington, and up through the East and West Kootenays. Such a plan, said Plamondon, would wipe out thousands of jobs, including I.W.A. forest industry jobs. “T hate to see what’s gonna happen here in the next while, because they have already decimated the guys on the Coast, so now they're just moving on to greener pastures up to the East and West Kootenays,” he added. ° Carmen Rocco, Local 1-80 ¢ Wayne Munro, Local 1-85 Heli-logging has unfair advantage The issues of unfair stumpage breaks for heli- Jogging and the qispprepHiats use of this method of harvesting were brought up in two resolutions that were unanimously approved by delegates. The union will lobby the B.C. government to put long-line systems on par with heli-logging stumpage assessments and will also demand that the province only allow heli-logging when conventional harvesting methods make them inaccessible by conventional means and when environmental sensitivities make conventional logging impossible. Local 1-80’s Carmen Rocco told delegates that there’s about a 65 per cent (stumpage fee) “kick- back” in the helicopter business. He said the use of long-lines systems is an efficient way to log and it employs more people. “And similar to the helicopter, we don’t have to build too many roads to do it,” he said. “Our costs (of harvesting) are around anywhere from $15 to $30 per cubic meter, depending on the type of terrain you’re in,” he said. Brother Rocco said that most helicopter logging operators employ a bare minimum of people. “The helicopters got a grapple now,” he said. “At one time the helicopters did have quite a few people on the side hill in Local 2171, but they switched to grapples, and now they’ve got a small skeleton ground crew,” he said. He said there are five long-line machines in his local and probably five more on the entire coast - most of which are shut down due to the stumpage problem. “You know, (we’ve) been involved on committees talking about costs all the time,” he added. “Well, here’s a piece of equipment that the Forest Service has deemed to be more sensitive (to the environment), and more or less the companies get to log for free on it.” Serge Vaillancourt of Local 2171 said the union has to realize “the ability that helicopters give to companies to turn us into market loggers is a very real threat to sustained employment and creates problems with sawmilling and other industries that depend on the traditional logging methods.” Vaillancourt said that current legislation does not prevent logging companies from using choppers and that “we should be supporting helicopter logging only in areas that are totally inaccessible by conventional methods.” Local 2171 president Darrel Wong said there used to be 17 long-line harvesting systems in his local and that has been reduced to about three. “Theyre being replaced by helicopter logging. Canadian AirCrane is probably one of the worst examples of that, because they don’t even have ground crew. All they use is grapples, and in fact, they employ next to no one,” he said. Wong said helicopter logging has been expanding into short-haul settings (as close as 400 feet away from the road and landing). A setting of 100,000 cubic meters that would take a conventional logging crew four to six months to log now takes a heli-logging show only four to six weeks to harvest. Wong said helicopter loggers can “hit the market absolutely on target every single time and leave the existing crews all laid off and ~_ sitting at home.” “On the other side of it, we also have a hell of a lot of members who work under helicopters, and quite frankly, do a good job, and so we don’t want to get into the argument of one I.W.A. member against the other,” he added. Wong said the union is trying to establish standards that are acceptable to both heli- logging and conventional crews. The local president said a balance has to be reached and that, on the Coast, the whole forest profile has to be logged. “It’s the only way that we’re going to be able to get the volume that we require to be able to keep people working,” he said. Local 1-85’s Wayne Munro said in his division area near Gold River heli-logging has resulted in damage to the logs and less recovery. In one setting a steel spar was already set up to log an area, with one portion being taken by a grapple yarder and another corner by a hoe chucker (hydraulic loader). Then it was half logged by a helicopter. In another instance a helicopter was used to take wood from right near the haulback of an idled yarder that was already set up. Munro said helicopters don’t create as many pockets of employment as they did before. “They’re basically now just running with a couple of pilots and the people running the grapples,” he said. @ e Pictured here are delegates from Kamloops, B.C. local 1-405 in the province’s southern interior. 24/LUMBERWORKER/DECEMBER, 2001