trations, they turn up the heat.” “mployers think that since Har- ris is in power, they can push harder and harder,” adds Rivard, Brother Navarretta says that last year was packed with cases, and that even during summer months when things traditionally slow down, employers where provoking griev- ances to the arbitration stage. There have been more discharges without just cause and companies have been trying to narrow the scope ¢ WHAT DO YOU DO? - except fight back against aggressive employers says Bob Navarretta, National Director of Arbitration Services. He says the amount of grievances in Ontario has shot up drastically since the pro-employer Harris government was elected in 1995. Union rep defends against Ontari “Every time that our members are done wrong, we should be there to take their case as far as it should 0,” says Bob Navarretta, the I.W.A. ‘ANADA’s director of Arbitration Services. Last year Brother Navarretta, who works out of the union’s national office on Weston Road in Toronto, helped I.W.A. locals get more wins than the New York Yankees. As every baseball aficionado knows the Yankees won 114 games. Navarretta, in connection with local ae unions, turned 115 grievances into settlements for ILW.A. CANADA after they were referred to his office following the exhaustion of steps at the local union level. He only had three losses, which is far less than the Yankees. This designated-hitting is not by design — it’s of necessity. Employ- ers in Ontario are becoming more aggressive every year that the Con- servative government of Mike Har- ris is in power. Whereas Navarretta used to have between 50-60 griev- y employers ances referred to him over the past 17 years, that number has skyrock- eted since Harris took power. “With the political system in Ontario being what it is, employers all over our union and other unions are becoming less declined to settle issues peacefully,” points out Nor- man Rivard, the I.W.A. National Fourth Vice President who also works out of the Toronto office. “When they sense that they can weaken a union by getting it to spend more and more on costly arbi- Be zs ° Attending health and safety seminars in Miramichi in July of 1998 were (enone row I. to r.) Gordie Trevors, New Brunswick Continued from page six “Tozer didn’t give a damn that there is a collective agreement in place and that we are the bargain- agent for the workers at the ply- wood mill,” said Bob Navarretta, the I.W.A. Director of Arbitration Services. Tozer wants to eliminate the union shop provision in the contract, put ees on probationary periods for one at $10 an hour and the sec- ond year at $11 an hour. He also wants to gut seniority provisions. That is despite the fact that the mill’s production is high and ply- wood prices and orders are strong. “In my opinion this move by Tozer has epecine to do with trying to effectively break the I.W.A. in the province. He knows that we are try- ing to organize in New Brunswick,” said Navarretta, who met with him in early March. “We told him we’re not interested and that he has a col- lective agreement in place to hon- our.” “The feedback that we’re getting from the members is very positive,” said Navarretta. “They are tired of National Safety Director Tom Lowe, and Jason Driscoll. In the back row (1. to r.) are Ralph Thibodeau, National First Vice President Neil Menard, Pat Hogan, Clarence O'Toole, and Jeff Goss. being bashed by their employer and being asked for concessions.” “Workers in New Brunswick, espe- cially who are non-union, get scared by Tozer,” he added. “This guy intim- idates workers and has taken action to prevent people from freely joining a union.” “The I.W.A. is commited to our members in New Brunswick and we are going to fight Tozer and any other employer that stands in the way of progress for workers. We hope to show New Brunswickers that being in the I.W.A. will make a difference when dealing with employers like this,” he said. Photo courtesy Local of collective agreements — even by challenging who should or shouldn’t be in the bargaining unit. A company like MacMillan Bloedel, who has traditionally sought peaceful labour relations, is now more aggressive. It tried to introduce more student relief work- ers to replace its regular union employees at its Nipigon Plywood and specialty plant. “This kind of stuff was unheard of before. MacMillan Bloedel is fight- ing us every inch of the way and is challenging the very make-up of the bargaining unit itself and it’s not something that we are used to,” he says. By utilizing the services of Navar- retta, as the I.W.A.’s in-house arbi- tration representative in Eastern Canada, the union has avoided the pitfall of spending money on large legal fees. Huge legal bills area headache for many locals in the I.W.A. and other unions. “Arbitration is not rocket science,” says Navarretta. “If a union repre- sentative can follow the rules of pre- senting evidence and feels a passion for the union member that has the grievance, that representative can become a good advocate.” “We get ideologically intimidated that lawyers are supposed to be the only ones that can take on arbitra- tion cases and win,” he says. “But that is not true. There is no educa- tion for lawyers on how to cross- ,examine witnesses. Some of people that we have in the I.W.A. are and could be much better than any lawyer. Arbitration applies some labour laws, but they don’t concern themselves with other areas of law like family law or criminal law. It is not as difficult as people might think.” “T would really encourage local unions to have somebody in-house that do arbitrations, not just for the cost savings but to show the employ- ers that we are ready to take on any company for whatever just reason.” “Ideologically the only way you can hit employers is in the pocket book, he says. “Sometimes the employer will take us on, usually because of the size of the local or the idea that they are not going to spend that much money when we can’t afford to spend it. Once they (the employers) realize that they are the ones spending the big bucks, and our handling of arbitrations is very efficient and cost effective, they will settle cases.” * Hired on by the former Region Two of the International Woodwork- ers of America, in August of 1973, following working for the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store union (where, as a rank and filer, he was a maintenance mechanic) Navarretta started out as on orga- nizer, working about 1-1/2 years in that field. Then he became a service representative to negotiate collec- tive agreements and handle griev- ances. In 1977 he fought and won his first arbitration case, after tak- ing some CLC courses and studying on his own. Since then he has han- dled well over 1000 grievances beyond the Step Four stage. Most of those grievance wins benefitted the LW.A. membership in Local 1000, 500, 700 and 2693. He has also taken on some cases for Local 2995. Today his duties include the instruction of arbitration classes at the CLC’s Winter School in Port Elgin, Ontario. He has done so for Continued on page sixteen _LUMBERWORKER/MARCH, 1999/7