° At Pacific’s Mesachie Lake logging division on Vancouver Island, are (above 1. to r.) camp chairman Gord Ohman and committee member Jack Nahirnick. Be- low (1. to r.) are landing man Mike Holman and landing bucker Dan Miles. Union members get ready for battle with Pacific 1.W.A. CANADA members in British Columbia who work for Pacific Forest Products and MacMillan Bloedel should not be fooled by both compa- ny’s new status as “associate mem- bers” within Forest Industrial Rela- tions (FIR) says Local 1-80 President Bill Routley. He wants to inform union members that FIR will be acting only as an in- formation service to these forest com- panies during coast master agreement bargaining sessions in 1997 and that both are trying to deceive their work- ers by declaring themselves as associ- ate members. “Both Pacific and MacBlo have ab- solutely no legal status within FIR as ‘associate members,” says Brother Routley. “That and 25 cents will get them a phone call.” Routley points out that both compa- nies will simply be monitoring what is going on between the I.W.A. and FIR and will paying a fee to do so. _ “After we negotiate an agreement with the rest of the industry these companies can decide to buy into it, into part of it, or reject it completely and go their own way,” adds Routley. “They both will have no impact on the legal bargaining structure of FIR.” “ee local union president says that Pacific’s October 25 move to deac- credit from FIR is an attempt to ride on MB's coattails and look for a less restrictive collective agreement. The 1.W.A. has already taken a strong posi- tion by applying to the Labour Rela- tions Board to consolidate all of MB's operations into one single bargaining unit. Tn 1994 Pacific tried to do the same thing by deaccrediting from FIR. Sub- sequent pressure, from the I.W.A. dur- ing negotiations with FIR, resulted in pushing Pacific back into FIR prior to the settlement of the current three eement. yen 1994 Pacific gave us a hard time ‘so we're not really surprised about eir move to deaccredit from FIR in,” comments Routley. “Pacific always been one of the most un- _serupulous employers for our local to ‘ with anyways.” At Pacific’s Mesachie Lake logging division, camp chairman Gord Ohman recalls the emotional roller- coaster that workers went on in 1994 wie the company first opted out of “We were and still are aware of what happened with the I.W.A. in the United States in the 1980’s when for- est companies began to segregate the union operations and bargain individ- ual agreements,” says Brother Ohman. “We do not ever want to start going down that road which means conces- sions to the employers. We like the working conditions that we have fought for over the years and we want to maintain them.” Ohman says that Pacific has started a public relations campaign with its employees in order to sell its deac- creditation from FIR. The company is trying to communicate its agenda of add-on bonus systems and alternate compensation systems. It has tried to segregate the workers at Mesachie Lake to deliver its message. “The crew has told me that it’s ei- ther all of us together or none of us,” says Ohman. “We’ve communicated to them (Pacific) that we want back in FIR as a full-fledged member. Every- body understands what happens if you try to go it on your own.” Brother Ohman mentions that bonus systems, such as the one that Pacific will try to put into place, can pose a serious threat to safety condi- tions for the loggers. “Safety always seems to be the first. thing to suffer when people think of that extra dollar they can get for in- creased production - that’s the price you pay,” he says. “It all boils down to that if we don’t stand together, then they'll (Pacific) knock us off, one by one,” he adds. “I'm convinced that the membership understands that.” Jack Nahirnick, a welder/mechanic and union committee member at the Mesachie Lake shop, says that Pacific has been very aggressive at contract- ing out work and does not abide by the collective agreement. “This (deaccreditation from FIR) has made everyone feel very uneasy,” he says. “We don’t know exactly what to expect as we approach ‘97 negotia- tions.” Brother Nahimick says that Pacific backed off in 1994, partly because the company was seeking the union’s sup- port in opposing radical environmen- talists on Vancouver Island. “Now that they’ve got that settled down, they decided to take us on again,” he says. He also says that the line of com- munications between I.W.A. members who work for Pacific and MacMillan Bloedel must be kept open when 1997 negotiations take place. Pacific has logging operations in Ze- ballos, Gold River, and Mesachie Lake. Local 1-80 is currently em- broiled in a contracting out battle with the company at Sooke division where the company shut down its company operations for over two sone and introduced contractors in 1993. The company has a sawmill in Lady- smith and a sawmill in Nanaimo. N.E.W. process Continued from page eight the hiring of more engineering person- nel to ensure that TimberWest can process the more complex permits re- quired under the Code. Brother Kinney says that Timber- West is more cooperative than other companies in Local 1-80 in looking for N.E.W. opportunities as it remembers the history of battles between the LW.A. and Fletcher Challenge. “I think that the company, and espe- cially South Island Manager Bob Beard, knows that the wounds from the cutbacks starting in 1989 are not fully healed yet and are more con- cious that workers and their commu- nities demand more jobs on the land base,” he says. Now Fletcher Challenge is trying to completely sell its controlling interest in TimberWest. Kinney hopes that the new buyer chosen will remain enthu- siastic with the N.E.W. program. “I certainly hope the new purchaser will buy into N.E.W.,” comments Kin- ney. “There are many things in it that are in place that are beneficial to both the company and the union.” SELECT HARVESTING CREW One area where two jobs have been created are in a special cut and skid, select harvest crew. Prior to the union’s involvmemt in the N.E.W. pro- gram the work was being done by contractors. The two man crew has been selec- tively harvesting 60-80 year old sec- ond growth timber. The trees are indi- vidually cut down and skidded out with a mini-cat. There's no telling how long the new jobs will last. So far there are several sites to be harvested along Lake Cowichan and some campsite build- ing to be done. Faller Al Margetish and cat opera- tor Barney Edgar have been working together under some new Individual Tree Harvesting guidelines. Al falls them and Barney often helps in the bucking and limbing and hauls them to roadside. The crew will also be used to selectively cut and skid timber to trails where a grapple yarder will be set up to pull the wood out to logging roads. Both men have received some Indi- vidual Tree Harvesting training with assistance from Forest Renewal B.C. aed Landing bucker processes logs at Mesachie Lake logging division. LUMBERWORKER/DECEMBER 1996/9 FRBC TRAINING ON LONG-LINES Another area where I.W.A. mem- bers have received training for N.E.W. related jobs is on the company’s two B-90 Skagit long-line machines that employ up to 19 workers. The crews were sent to TimberWest’s Nanaimo Lakes Division to check out and be trained on the harvesting system. FRBC paid for 75% (about $18,000) of the training, which took place in the Spring of this year. Workers learned the principles (i.e. rig-ups, road changes) and safety pro- cedures needed for operation of the long-line system. The company has found out that long-line harvesting costs, which em- ploy more manpower, are about half of the costs of helicopter logging which can run about $65 per cubic meter from stump to roadside. Brother Kinney points out that the union is concerned about the increas- ing introduction of heli-logging which eliminates jobs and is more expensive to do. The company plans to increase its helicopter harvesting to about 150,000 cubic meters, on public and private land, in the coming year. COMMUNICATING WITH OTHER 1.W.A. MEMBERS Although the N.E.W. program has been most successful at Honeymoon Bay, Local 1-80 hopes that other com- panies will follow suit. Brother Kinney says there is a lot of work yet to be done - both at Timber- West operations and at other local union certifications. “There are still some operations that are slow in implementing mean- ingful programs under N.E.W. and we have to get out there and communi- cate what we have done at Honey- moon Bay,” he says. Carmen Rocco says that N.E.W. is being seen, with some success, in MacMillan Bloedel’s Northwest Bay, and Shawnigan Lake division. Pacific Forest Products is beginning to get the program off the ground at Mesachie Lake division. “For a long time, MacBlo wouldn't even say that new jobs are being seen under N.E.W.,” says Brother Rocco. “That is beginning to change slowly.” “Most of our members don’t even realize that N.E.W. is part of the col- lective agreement,” says Rocco. “They've never even heard of it or if they have, they've never paid much at- tention to it.” In 1997 the industry will be hearing from the union about the successes and failures of the N.E.W. program. 2