HISTORY OF THE I.W.A. I.W.A. is born during the Dirty 1930’s which sees Canadian loggers and millworkers strike for pay, benefits and security Article by Clay Perry PART Ill The Great 1933-35 Strikes, Wave the United Front, the C.1.0. and the birth of the 1.W.A. n the last issue, covering the late twen- ties and up to 1931, we dealt with forest industry strikes in Northern Ontario, the establishment in 1929 of the “Worker's Unity League” (a labour “central,” like our modern C.L.C., for Communist-led, revo- lutionary unions), and one of the major strug- aes of the time, the Fraser Mills strike of late 1931. But the real strike action in the Canadian forest industry began in 1933, as a part of a wave of left-wing labour action across Canada and the U.S., from West Coast Longshoremen to textile workers in the South to automotive part workers in Ohio.” Cochran reports that US. strikes in 1933, mostly late in the year, were twice as frequent than they were in 1932, and that, in 1934, there were 1,856 U.S. strikes, with 1,470,000 workers participating. Bruce Magnuson, a Canadian Communist who became a Lumberworker leader in Northern Ontario, reported that the Workers’ Unity League organized 292 strikes during the depression, and “won” over 80% of them.” The great majority of these strikes were of lumberworkers, miners and needle trades workers. On June 3, 1933, the Lumber Workers In- dustrial Union of Canada (L.W.I.U.C.) held what we would today call a wages and con- tract conference and resolved to launch a campaign demanding a 20% increase in piece rates, from $2.50 to $3.00 per cord, reductions in board charges, camp committees, and an end to “yellow dog” contracts, in which work- ers were required on applying for work to agree not to join any union. They gave the Pi- geon Lake Company less than 48 hours to agree, then 700 pulp cutters struck.” For several weeks, the operators refused to meet with the union “Reds,” but finally agreed to a 10% piece rate increase and a substantial decrease in board charges. Considering that this took place in the middle of the Great De- pression, it was a substantial, encourging achievement. So the L.W.LU.C. and the I.W.W. held a joint a “Northern Ontario Conference” in mid-August, to prepare for the coming cut- ting season, and demanded piece rate increas- es of 25%, and improved camp and safety con- ditions. Strikes started shortly after, and by January, 1934, bushworkers from Thunder Bay, Fort Frances, Hearst, Kapuskasing, Iro- quois Falls, Chapleau and Rouen, Quebec, were out. Bruce Magnuson began his long and illustrious involvement with Lumberworkers during this strike, acting as recording secre- tary at strikers’ meetings. Northern Ontario members will be interest- ed to know that Chapleau strikers were so strongly supported by their community that they were able to draw relief for six or seven weeks, and that prominent Liberals criticized the Tory governments in Ottawa and Queen’s Park for failure to support the strikers. Some things do change. : These were rough strikes. Magnuson re- ports a skirmish in which 1000 picketers broke up an effort by strikebreakers to re- move horses from a Pigeon River Timber Co. stable, and drove mounted police off with a 8/LUMBERWORKER/MARCH, 1996 ~ UBC Special Collections, ¢ In July of 1935 members of the Lumber Workers Industrial Workers Union of Canada gathered during a bushworker strike in front of the Finnish Canadian Hoito restaurant in Port Arthur, Ontario (now Thun- der Bay). hail of stones: “...However, the next morn- ing about 4 A.M., after boozing all night, several hundred of the local constabu- lary surprised hundreds of workers (who were) sleeping in two halls adja- cent to the previous day’s skirmish, by driving the workers out of the halls into the streets in 25 degree below zero tem- perature, attacking them with their bil- lies as they fled...one Norwegian worker died a few years after as a result of this merciless brutality.” ” And Radforth quotes press reports of 250 strikers boarding a train carrying fifty strike- breakers. Coach windows were smashed, two policemen were injured, and J.A. Mathieu, owner of a struck company, suffered three broken ribs. n interesting aspect of the Northern Ontario scene is the role played by west coasters. Carl and Martin Palm- gren, Jack Gillbanks and Ted Guner- ad all helped to organize the major strikes, and all attracted the attention of the secret R.C.M.P. Through the party apparatus and Worker Unity League channels, there was very close contact across a vast stretch of the country. Results varied from camp to camp, but usu- ally included some increase in piece rates, and some decrease in board charges. And the Ontario Government, in a move similar to that of B.C. (both perhaps patterned after U.S. President Rooseveldt’s moves to settle pro- longed coal strikes), established the “Woods- men’s Employment Inquiry Act” early in 1934. Under the provisions of this Act, investigators brought some uniformity to wages and camp conditions, and were probably most effective where conditions were the worst, such as the case of a man who worked for 27 days and owed the camp fifty cents.© In one instance, Investigator L.A. Dent praised the strike committee, adding his view that “great credit” was due to the union for what it had accomplished, and recommended that it be recognized. He said the operator's “pugnacious attitude” was the. real barrier to settlement, and criticized the Ontario Provin- cial Police for openly expressing sympathy for the operator. However, no change in the attitude of the OPP was noticed.” This wave of strikes reached its climax in 1935. The L.W.I.U. held a “Wage Scale Confer- ence” in Port Arthur on April 7th and 8th, and demanded substantial wage increases, free transportation, camp committees and even a form of “dues check-off” which stated: “Com- pany to grant the right of workers to donate money to unions and societies. Such money to be deducted from pay cheques of each donor.” ¢ t In June, as the “sap-peeling” season started, the Union issued a strike call and 2,100 pulp- cutters walked off the job. Charlie Cox, an op- erator and M.P.P., acted as spokesman for the _ employers. He blamed the “unrest” on “Red Agitators.” The union responded with a pam- phlet (They were great leaflet writers. On the West Coast, they issued a strike bulletin every day, in addition to numberless calls to other unions, millworkers, the unemployed, etc.). Quoting a Joseph Galitcki: “The tents are full of holes, blankets were torn, and lucky was the man who had two of them The beds were constructed of small spruce, balsam and poplar poles...the men had to chop branches of spruce and balsam to make the beds more comfort- able...The timber is scarce and we had to walk in water from six to ten inches deep...there was no wash house, and we had to wash in a small creek... These are the reasons why the timber workers de- clared a general strike in Thunder Bay.” They were out for over a month, winning a small wage increase and recognition of camp committees. More importantly, they put forest industry unionism, at least among the pulp- cutters, on a firm footing, the basis of union- ism in Northern Ontario forests to this day. MEANWHILE, OUT ON THE PACIFIC COAST Arne Johnson, Hjalmar Bergren, Eric Graf and the others were working under the same general “Worker's Unity League” (Communist Party of Canada) guidance. The object was to produce a strong, coast-wide logging strike to improve conditions and, thereby, to establish a militant, revolutionary union in B.C.’s most important industry. They decided to concen- tate on the Bloedel, Stewart and Welch camp at Menzies Bay. The union had the strongest group of union men there, and the employer was cooperating by being generally miserable. So throughout the fall of 1933, union leaders- worked hard and secretly to get as many mili- tant union men, especially among the mostly Scandinavian fallers, into that “most hated Continued on next page