° In 1931, woodworkers block railway tracks outside Fraser Mills where they struck for union security, wage increases and overtime provisions. History of the L.W.A. Continued from page seventeen Rosvall and Voutilainen, and to all the North- ern Ontario Finns, “red” and “Wobbly, who kept unionism alive in Canadian forests in those tough years from 1926 to 1931. ut on the West Coast, the loggers who had held their first tentative meeting late in 1928, met again in the fall of 1929, joined by Eric Graf, Hjal- mar Bergren, Joe Anderson, Ted Gunerad and others. Interestingly, this second meeting was held after the decision had been taken by the C.P.C. to create their own revolutionary Yabour central, the “Workers’ Unity League,” but before it was “official.” From the point of view of winning strikes, it was not auspicious timing. The Great Depres- sion was just beginning, thousands were al- ready unemployed, and they were to be joined by millions. Such strikes as were ventured such as an eight hour one against Frank Be- ban Lumber Co. at Extension, B.C. usually failed because of bad economic times and poor organization. But the new revolutionary organization worked well with the disillusioned, angry un- employed (there was no “pogey” in those days). They created the “National Union of Un- employed Workers’ Association” (N.U.W.A.), of which Arne Johnson was first secretary-trea- Surer, and under the leadership of George Drayton, the first W.U.L. organizer, conducted campaigns that showed immediate results, such as a December, 1930 action that won bed and board tickets for 2000 members in ex- change for one day’s work per week. More im- portant, they won solid organizational gains, prestige among Canadian workers, and some very effective picketers for future strikes. Is Life worth Living 2 IF NOT, ORGANIZE If you want to improve your living and working conditions Join the 4 LUMBER WORKERS | INDUSTRIAL UNION Of the One Big Union. Branch Offices in EVERY DISTRICT. Meadquarters: 61 Cordova St. W.- Vancouver, B.C. eae IW.A. Archives Probably the first real success for the new “Lumber & Agricultural Workers’ Union” began on July 22 1931, at Barnett Lumber Co. The strike was against a new “bonus system” which would have entailed a 10% wage cut to 350 millhands, and it succeeded in restoring the full wage, owing largely to the “sudden” ap- pearance of a great many N.U.W.A. picketers. A much longer and more important strike began on September 16, 1931, at Fraser Mills, in what is now Coquitlam, B.C., involving about 700 workers. In the four months pre- ceding the strike, three wage cuts of ten cents per hour had been imposed by the Canadian Western Lumber Co. That attracted the atten- tion of the new union and of the W. U. L. George Drayton reported. “After two or three months of organizational work, a union meeting was held to discuss the report of the shop committee, and to decide whether to strike for a 10% increase in wages...”° Also demanded were time and a half for overtime, a closed (union) shop. The strike chairman was a 27 year old shin- gle weaver named Harold Pritchett who was guided by his recollections of 1919 strikes mentioned at the beginning of this article, es- pecially led by the steam engineers.” At the beginning of the strike, Harold, much to the consternation of the C.P.C., was a mem- ber of the Independent Labour Party (I.L.P.). In a W.U.L. article, George Drayton fumed: “In this strike it has been mooted after four days of militant leadership that the two medicine men of the ILL.P. (McInnis and Winch) should be invited to speak to a meeting of the strik- ers. This was suggested by the Chairman of the Strike Committee who belongs to the I.L.P. This must be combatted to the limit. This is when the I. L. P. are the most dangerous.” Harold was a considerable prize, much sought after by all left parties. He remem- bered Ernie Winch visiting him, urging him to avoid the C.P.C. “He (Winch) was so poor that he tied his running shoes with store string.” For whatever reason certainly a part of it was the superior organizational ability of the “Lumber & Agricultural Workers Industrial Union,” the W.U.L. and the Unemployed Workers, who, under Arne Johnson, once again supplied sturdy picketers. But Harold was also won over, as he re- membered it fifty years later, by the overall theory. Unions (and their strikes) had to be guided by a political party with an all-encom- passing, global view and strategic plan. The strike was a masterpiece of organiza- tion. Most of the workers, and active union members, were French Canadian, brought from the Ottawa valley in 1909 by the devout- ly Catholic McCormick family that owned the mill. Although these French Canadian work- ers were almost all strong Catholics, served by a very conservative Priest named Father U.B.C. Special Collections Tech, most became strong union men, and quite a few became communists. Leo Canuel told me proudly that six members of the church choir were members of the party, al- most certainly a record for the Canadian Catholic Church. How did they reconcile these two conflict- ing life-organizing principles? Working peo- ple, as Harold and Tim Buck and many others, including the author, were slow to learn, do not need to reconcile their beliefs into one all- encompassing system, Catholicism or Marx- ism, or any other. “Father Tech is a good priest,” one worker told an organizer, “and we do what he tells us - on Sunday.” The company, responding to very vigorous picketing, had the grounds patrolled by an armed “special watch” of foremen with ma- chine guns mounted at the entrance to the mill.“ Ten picketers were arrested, four of whom were probably unemployed loggers, two spent two days for “assaulting an officer.” Space does not permit a description of the extent and ingenuity of the organizing that won a victory in the two and a half month strike, held in | — extremely tough || times. Suffice it to | say that on Novem- ber 20, 1931, the company made an offer of from four to seven and a half per FF cent wage increase, the crew accepted by a vote of 466 to 55, and returned to work on December Ist. The victory was much diminished by the fact that many on the strike committee, in- cluding Harold Pritchett, were refused work by the company, and the union lacked the strength to keep their leaders, or to keep any real organization in the mill. But that was not the last that the forest in- dustry, in Canada and the U.S., was to hear of Harold and the new union. NEXT ISSUE: The 1934 Loggers’ strike, The “United Front” reappears, The Long Cold March in northern Ontario, and how H & < ¢ Harold Pritchett “it came about that the close association between forest unions in the west and in northern ontario, that had lasted from 1919 to 1936, disappeared for the next half century. References (1) Hak, Gordon, “B.C. Loggers and the Lum- ber Workers Industrial Union, 1919 - 1922,” published in “Labour/LeTravail”, Issue 23, Spring 1989 pp 67-90. A good summary of these events. V.I. Lenin, “Collected Works,” Vol 10, Inter- national Publishers, New York, 1943. Quot- ed in Penner, Norman. “Canadian Commu- nism: The Stalin Years and Beyond.” Methuen. Toronto, 1988. p.79. Taken from R.C.M.P. Security Bulletins. National Archives of Canada. Author’s Possession. Passages quoted from a lengthy pamphlet “Shall Unionism Die?” by Gordon Cascaden, a Canadian delegate to the R.LL.U. conference who was protest- ing these policies. Penner, p 4 R.C.M.P., Vol. 4, p 652. Hak, p 84 and Minutes, B.C. Loggers’ Asso- ciation., C.O.F.I. Collection, Special Col- lections, U.B.C. Library. Penner, p 82. Radforth, Ian. “Bushworkers and Bosses: Logging in Northern Ontario, 1900 - 1980.” University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1987. p 122. (10) Penner, pp 89 - 102. (11) Penner, p 100. (12) Radforth, Appendix# 9. (13) Repo, Satu, “Rosvall and Voutilainen: Two Union Men Who Never Died.” Published in Labour/Le Travailleur, No. 8/9, Autumn - Spring, 1981/82. pp 79 -102. (14) Repo, pp 83-86. (15) Repo, p 95. (16) W.U.L. Leaflet. I.W.A. CANADA Archives. (17) Interview of Harold Pritchett by Clay Per- ry. I.W.A. CANADA Archives. (18) Meyers, Jeannie. “The Fraser Mills Strike of 1931.” Paper presented to Northwest Labour History Conference, 1982. I.W.A. CANADA Archives. @) @) LUMBERWORKER/DECEMBER, 1995/19