e At Lubbe Lake reservoir, Local 1-80 members discuss logging activity. L. to r. are Local 1-80 business agent Bri- an Butler, local union president Bill Routley, and watershed chargehand Mike Kral. Victoria watershed loggers face new obstacles despite excellent If there is anywhere where there are outstanding logging practices, it is seen in the Greater Victoria Water Supply Area. Since the late 1950’s, IWA members have logged, replanted, and tended to the area which supplies the province’s capital and its sur- rounding areas with quality drinking water. All of that activity takes place under a regime of “intensive forest manage- ment” in which logging is only a part of the planning that is involved. So as recent attacks against forest practices in the watershed have been mounting, those who work in the woods are be- coming very concerned that their long term employment may be at risk. In the Spring of this year a provin- cial court judge reviewed the legisla- tive act that put the Greater Victoria Water District into place and said that commercial logging was not meant to be part of its mandate. There has been a steady looging crew in the watershed since 1957 and commercial logging was always done. The proceeds from the sales of the logs go to pay out the wages and ex- penses and then go into the coffers of the GVWD. All of the logging activity has helped Victoria reduce its drink- ing water costs. On their zealous quest to shut down logging environment groups such as the Sierra Club of Western Canada and the Wester Canadian Wilderness Committee brought the watershed logging case to court and got the judge on their side. The IWA strongly disagrees with the judge’s ruling on commercial log- ging and says that the wording of the legislation gives the GVRD Board of Governors the right to manage the lands in the district and that must in- clude commercial logging. Bill Routley, president of IWA- CANADA Local 1-80, which repre- sents about 25 union members who work in the watershed says that envi- ronmental groups are looking for any reason to put a halt to logging activity. Brother Routley says the judge also went one step further against the union and its workers by saying that the GVWD should sell off its non- catchment lands (the lands not relat- ed to run-off for drinking water) and that, if there is harvesting done in those lands, it should be done by con- tractors. That was a giant leap in logic that the union does not accept. “What the judge basically did is make some recommendations that are not even related to the main issue of the case,” says Routley. “Conservation groups were asking about commercial logging and he added things to his rul- ing that do damage to us.” “We're taking a wait and see atti- tude to see what the GVWD does next,” says the local union president. The crews can still operate for rea- sons related to the maintenance and improvement of water quality. In intensive forest management planning there are various “land use prescriptions” invoked to preserve water quality in the threat of fire, blowdown, erosion and disease. Over the next several years the log- ging and forestry crews (which are one in the same) will be working in the Sooke Lake Reservoir where they have to harvest about 300 hectares of timber around the perimeter of the lake in order to prepare it for raising the lake levels. In the past two years there have been water restrictions in the Victoria area. “One of the problems we have at the Sooke Reservoir is that when wa- ter levels go down, the water laps up against the intake tower in front of the dam and there is a build up of muddy water,” says Mike Kral, a Local 1-80 member. Unfortunately when this occurs, fin- gers are incorrectly pointed at the log- ging in the watershed. There are other problems in the wa- tershed as well. One of its contributo- ry lakes, Lubbe Lake has only been about 50% full in the last two years as forestry the GVWD has been examining it for earthquake resistance. Presently the workers are clearing an area where there will be rock brought in to stren- then the existing dam which was made over 100 years ago. In 1993 the GVWD water board gave the go ahead to commercial log on non-catchment lands as long as that harvesting was done selectively. The results have been impressive. With a considerable amount of planning by the foresters and the crew along with approval of the Workers’ Compensation Board, the loggers were able to rig up skyline rackway systems with a small mechanical car- riage and did some select logging and small patch openings. “We're trying to show the Board dif- ferent harvesting techniques,” says Brother Kral. There has been shelterwood logging and single tree selection harvesting. Some of the logging has also been done with a skidder. The crew developed its own proce- dures in consultation with the WCB to ensure that the select falling was done in as safe a way as possible. The se- lect falling did not take place on very steep ground. Nor did it occur in large scale old growth forests. It was pri- marily done in an area where fire had swept through over a hundred years earlier. In one area the crew left 20-25 foot spaces between standing trees. In oth- er areas they spaced them out about 40 feet apart. The long term health of newly planted seedlings and exisiting saplings will be compared in the two different areas. The crew is proud of the work it has done in the selective harvest areas and would like to see the public more aware of their work. Even the chairman of the Water Board, Bert Kane, has wanted to get some media attention for these new efforts. Continued on next page A a ¢ Select harvesting areas have been carefully managed. Two year old seedlings have been planted to speed up regeneration. 6/LUMBERWORKER/JUNE, 1994