Same forces that backed Mulroney support Campbell anadians now have a new Prime Minister designate - our very own Margaret Thatcher in disguise. Vancouver's Kim Campbell has been thrust into the spotlight as a creation of the Tory controlled media which is prop- ping up a new saviour of the Progressive Conservative Party. Out of nowhere this new media creation of Kim Campbell has arisen. Suddenly a rookie Member of Parliament is being groomed to steer Canada’s destiny. Her public relations army is using Bill Clinton’s formula for electoral success. “I want to change the way we do politics in this coun- try” says Ms. Campbell. She claims to want to put integrity back into the political process. These bland statements are basically the same cam- paign rhetoric that has been used in other Tory cam- paigns to gain support from a public that is prone to political amnesia. If elected as Prime Minister later this year, Ms. Camp- bell will have five more years to disassemble this coun- try. If elected she will be the woman who will oversee the dismantling of universal medicare and other social programs in this country. She has already said that universality in pensions is on the table and that hospital user fees will be consid- ered under her leadership. If Kim Campbell is elected there will be no change to the conservative right wing agenda which has brought us “free trade”, privatization and deregulation. All of the destructive programs and policies which Brian Mulroney put into place were whole heartedly supported by Kim Campbell. As Justice Minister and Defence Minister she was a vital part of the Mulroney Cabinet. The same people and forces that drove the Mulroney government will drive a Campbell government. The face of the party may change but the vested interests will remain the same. Campbell’s management team consists of private gov- ernment policy consultants, powerful public relations firms and lobbyists, and commercial law advisors. Their current and recent client list includes AT&T, multi- national oil interests, the tobacco industry, and the $6 billion helicopter project for the Canadian military. Her backers are the same backers that have pushed the free trade agenda on our country. The FTA between Canada and the U.S. has devastated our country’s manu- facturing base. Over 350,000 good paying jobs are gone for good and poverty is at an all-time post Depression high. Revenue to provincial and federal governments have plummeted and the axe has been taken out to cut social spending. Our country is in a big mess and this trend is bound to continue unless the Tories are taken out of office in the next federal election. The only political alternative that IWA-CANADA sup- ports is the New Democratic Party of Canada. The NDP is the only credible political organization which recog- nizes and is speaking out against the growing social and economic rift which is now eradicating our middle class. z It is the only credible political force which can repre- sent workers’ interests. Our union will continue to sup- port the NDP throughout the upcoming election cam- paign to unseat the Tory government. We urge IWA members to become involved in their NDP constituencies. That is where we can speak out and ensure that the voice of labour is heard. Do not be fooled. Neither the Progressive Conserva- tives nor the Liberals will defend the rights of workers in Canada. LUIMBERUORKER Official publication of IWA-CANADA NORMAN GARCIA GERRY STONEY. . President ‘ NEIL MENARD... Ist Vice-President Editor FRED MIRON. . 2nd Vice-President eras WARREN ULLEY... 3rd Vice-President Acne tial Shee HARVEY ARCAND. 4th Vice-President ‘ TERRY SMITH. -Secretary-Treasurer Vancouver, B.C. V6E 4B2 BROADWAY *=@8=2 PRINTERS LTD. (RICE1G WHEN YOU CAN SNATCH THE DOLLAR FROM MY HANDS... THEN YOU WILL BE READY TO | INGRID RICE FOR THE LUMBERLIORKER. KIM'S FINAL TEST Tories ram through NAFTA legislation with hopes that public will forget before election Our country has been the first party to ratify the North American Free Trade Agree- ment (NAFTA). Ever faithful and subservient to U.S. corpo- rate interests, outgoing Prime Minister Brian Mulroney rammed through the NAFTA bill, limiting debate by opposi- tion parties. Even third world Mexico has not ratified the deal yet until it sees what is going to be written in side agreements on environmental standards, labour standards and import surges. In mid-May U.S. President Bill Clinton said there must be side deals on the three issues before ratification in his country. So why was Canada so fast to ratify the NAFTA? Look no further for an answer than politics - pure and simple. The Tory govern- ment has tried to whisk the NAFTA issue under the carpet well before the federal elec- tion which must be called later this year. The conserva- tive political power brokers who have pushed for the NAFTA want it out of the sights and minds of Canadi- ans before we go to the polls. The Tories are nervous because most Canadians are wary of their abysmal perfor- mance over the last nine years. Canada’s federal deficit has doubled to over $450 bil- lion in these years, we've got record number of unem- ployed and the country is fac- ing the destruction of its social programs which have made our society a more just one. Now the U.S. wants the power to levy trade sanctions against Canada and Mexico “for reported and persistent violations” of environmental regulations and workers rights. The move by the Clinton Administration is an attempt to shore up support in the face of declining domestic enthusiasm for NAFTA. The anti-NAFTA sentiment is strongest in northeastern. U.S. industrial states which have the most to lose if the deal goes ahead. Twenty-four Democratic members of the House of Representatives are saying no, no matter what takes place in the NAFTA side- deal negotiations. That anti- NAFTA caucus is deadly con- cerned about what will hap- pen to the U.S. automobile industry, textile, and apparels sectors. What is most entertaining about Clinton’s push for a deal on labour standards is The NAFTA will only speed up the loss of jobs while multina- tional corporations take their invest- ments south that he knows all too well what kind of conditions in which the majority of Mexi- can workers toil. U.S. politicians know that hundreds of thousands of Mexican workers suffer repression and abuse by employers and governments. There is no such thing as free collective bargaining in Mexi- co. The government con- trolled trade unions routinely sell-out the interests of the workers they control. Strikes are routinely bro- ken by state police in cooper- ation with the “unions” and torture, disappearance, and murder of activists is not unusual. Clinton himself was gover- nor of the state of Arkansas when it brought in “right to work” legislation during the 1980’s. U.S. employers have used open shop labour laws to intimidate workers from joining unions and weaken their effectiveness. The U.S. has nothing to teach Canada about the rights of workers or labour stan- dards. Any side deal on labour will only be used to selectively harass Mexico and Canada when trade activity doesn’t fit U.S. desires. The Free Trade Agreement. has made Canada more dependent on the U.S. than at any time before. At the same time the U.S. has increased its harassment of Canadian exporters such as the soft- wood lumber industry. We have lost hundreds of thousands of jobs and nearly 30% of our country’s manufac- turing base. The NAFTA will only speed up the loss of jobs and migration of capital as, by and large, U.S. based multi- nationals make decisions which will effect our future. Canadians have a great deal to be concerned about. Our whole future as a sovereign nation is on the line with the FTA and NAFTA. We should be deeply concerned about such vital issues as provincial gov- ernment powers being over- ridden by NAFTA regulations. We must also be concerned about harmonization of envi- ronmental standards, labour standards, agriculture sup- ply/management systems, and resources both renewable and non-renewable. Just because the NAFTA has. passed the House of Com- mons doesn’t mean that the battle for our country’s sover- eignty is lost. The federal election this fall will give workers and their supporters an opportunity to toss the conservatives out of office and scrap both the FTA and NAFTA. LUMBERWORKER/JUNE, 1993/5