Deen A New Employment Option for Canada The employment policies of the federal Liberal government have become a national disaster that has created a national tragedy. The Canadian government has decided to follow the American administration on its wild economic roller coaster. The economic hardline monetarists are now in power in the United States. When the U.S. economy gathers steam soon as is expected, the U.S. Federal Reserve Board will likely clamp down on any expansion in the money supply by once again sending interest rates up to 20 per cent. When that happens, the Liberal government, if it stays on its present disastrous course, will follow suit by jacking our rates up to the levels that triggered the deep recession we are now experiencing. With the monetarist thinking of the present government, we can be assured of a recession a year with periods of recovery that will be measured in months instead of years. The Liberal government has allowed the Canadian economy to decline into its present structural ruin over the past 15 years. Today we are paying the heavy price for that historic policy. The heavy price of Liberal policy Just what has been at the heart of Liberal economic policy since Pierre Trudeau took office in 1968? Pierre Trudeau’s economic strategy, despite all the tortuous twists and turns it has taken, has always been based on resource exports. Over the years, he has continually assured Canadians that Canada’s strength lies in its oil and gas and its metal minerals. Exports of resources have always been Pierre Trudeau’s idea of how to provide the good life for Canadians. There have been warning signs right from the start of the Trudeau era that the course on which we had embarked was a perilous one. Our-trade deficit in manufactured products in 1970 was $2.5 billion. But the Trudeau government allowed that deficit to grow while it relied on resource exports. The Prime Minister and his colleagues believed the oil companies when they told us we had reserves of petroleum that would last well into the next century, making oil our largest future earner of foreign exchange. strategy. As a result Canada’s balance of payments deficit trebled in one year, from $1.4 billion in 1974 to $4.7 billion in 1975. Not only had Pierre Trudeau trusted the oil companies on the subject of Canada’s petroleum reserves, he had treated foreign investors'as though they were philanthropists. His government continually sought foreign investment, forgetting that such investors do not come here for free. They expect a return on their investment. That return, in dividends and interest payments, has now become a disaster for our balance of payments. In 1980 the net outflow in dividends and interest payments to foreign investors totalled $5.5 billion. Sinking further into a crisis So now we are on an economic treadmill in Canada. No matter how fast we run to sell resources, we are sinking ever further into a balance of payments crisis. That trade deficit in manufacturing that stood at $2.5 billion in 1970 last year reached $21 billion for the single year of 1981. Overall the balance of payments deficit reached a record $9.1 billion last year. Why does that matter? It is worth peering inside the economic jargon to see what the consequences of the balance of payments crisis are for Canadians. Having a huge balance of payments deficit is the single most important factor in causing the Liberal government to ape every move the Reagan administration makes. What does the deficit do? It makes it very difficult to stimulate economic growth in the country without creating even greater problems. Saddled with this kind of deficit, Canada cannot make use of its productive capacities, cannot put its manpower to work, without draining the country of its foreign exchange reserves. In November 1981, the Industrial Policies Committee of the Science Council of Canada stated in a report: “Tt has become difficult for us to expand our economic activity and hence reduce unemployment without so enlarging our deficit as to make it necessary to throttle economic growth.’” Here is the syndrome that Liberal mismanagement has allowed to develop: If we expand our economy and put our citizens to work, then consumer demand will increase. If consumer demand increases, then Canada will step up its imports dramatically. This will not be offset by any increase in our exports. The result: Canada’s balance of payments deficit will surge even higher, leading to speculation against the Canadian dollar and consequently to pressure on the Bank of Canada to raise interest rates. : Make no mistake about it. The Liberal mismanagement of the Canadian economy for the past decade is directly responsible for creating a structure that opens us up to the full effects of the American recession. The Liberals got us into this mess in the first place by placing our hopes on resource exports and by opening up the country to foreign investors. How do they propose to get out of the mess? Liberals don’t change In 1974, following the world oil price revolution, the petroleum companies drastically revised their reserve estimates downward. Instead of oil surpluses we would have deficits. The rug had been pulled out from under Pierre Trudeau’s economic 6/Lumber Worker/April, 1982 They have such short memories in the Liberal Party. Their brief moment of contrition in the 1980 campaign when they talked about a new industrial strategy is behind them. Herb Gray has been benched and Senator Olson, the new czar of Economic Development, is