B.C. LUMBER WORKER WINN URGES N EW AND SOUNDER RELATIONS In a forthright statement over the Green Gold radio program, July 9th, Interna- tional Secretary-Treasurer Carl Winn urged acceptance of the Conciliation Board report, and expressed the need for a move realistic and- humane approach to labor- management relations in the lumber industry. When introduced by District President Joe Morris, who out- lined the terms of the Concilia- tion Board report, the Interna- tional official said in part: “You have just heard President Joe Morris read the Conciliation Board award and the Policy Com- mittee recommendation for ac- ceptance. This recommendation of your Policy Committee was reached after nearly two full days of careful deliberation. Many factors were analyzed and every avenue of reasoning ex- plored thoroughly. Some Bad Features The Conciliation Board’s award ‘| fell considerably short of the mark set by the’ Union in nego- tiations this year. The failure of the Board to recommend some additional paid holidays, and its silence on the union shop demand proved real ‘stumbling blocks’ in the Policy Committee discussion. It is conceded, by all, that our membership is not pleased with the ‘holiday’ and ‘Union Shop’ phases of the award, in particu- Jar. However, in weighing all the adverse factors of the award against the dire results another strike in the industry this year would have on the overall econ- omy of B.C., it was decided that we had to take a long look at some other important considera- tions in arriving at a final recom- mendation, New Pattern Needed I am not going to go into detail at this time as to what these other important considerations were, except to say that they re- lated to the very definite hope that a new pattern of labor- managment relations, arose from this year’s negotiations. Such a new pattern of think- ing—if it materialized, and we think that given a proper chance it will sueceed—can mean taking}. a big step toward stabilizing the lumber industry in British Co- lumbia. It can do a great deal to bring’ about a better understand- ing between this Union and the Employers on the problems which confront both sides in everyday living and working together. To speak of ‘cooperation’ be-| tween labor and management in this industry, after some of the things which have transpired over the year, probably borders on ‘heresy’ to many of our peo- ple, But we are going to speak of ‘cooperation’ because we sin- cerely believe that therein lies the answer to many mutual prob- Jems. We must weigh the com- mon good and general welfare of all our. people above anything else. Mainstay of Economy The lumbering industry con- stitutes better than 40 percent of this Province’s economy. The policies of this Union and the Policies of the Employers have to be directed along the lines of building this section of our economy as strong, as stable and as sound as it is humanly within our power to do. Both this Union and the Em- ployers have been irresponsible in the past in meeting some of the problems of this industry “Work For Common Good” squarely and trying to solve them realistically. The International is completely convinced that we have now reached the point where both sides must put their houses in order and work together for the betterment of this industry. Union Not “Soft” At this point let me say that nobody should be so naive as to think this means the Interna- tional Woodworkers of America are growing ‘soft’ or that we in- tend to relax, even for one min- ute, our vigilance over matters of strict Union policy in dealing with the Employers. Such is not the case, I assure you. We have had serions differences of opinion with the Employers in the past and we will have them in the future. : But this is not to say that we should not join forces in those matters relating to this industry which mean full employment, steady income for our people and a reasonable return to the Em- ployer on his financial invest- ment, Resources for Common Good This is our industry just as much as’ it is the Employer's. God gave man these resources for the common good of all. We haye just as much stake in its success or failure as have the Employers. It is to our bene- fit that this industry continues to ‘boom’, It is to our benefit that this industry be expanded and well managed. It is to our benefit that it be able to operate on prices that keep it competitive in a world market and still bring a reasonable profit. It is to our benefit that the Employers are aggressive and in the marketing of the industry. It is benefit that the Em- makes money. It is to our benefit that small efficient operators remain in business as well as the large ones. Union Takes Initiative The Employers have been re- luctant to take this step, of join- ing forces for the common good, and so has this Union—up to this time. Now we—the Union—are taking the initiative in this direc- tion because we see in such a course the distinct and important Possibility of strengthening the economy of this great industry. Tf this result can be obtained, our Union members and their families are going to gain far more than they ever will under a short-sighted policy of ‘let the Employer worry about his busi- ness and we'll tend to ours’. On the other hand, if the Em- ployers are not willing to take this. step with us, then the re- sponsibility for any future break- downs in the economy of this in- dustry must rest solely with them and the public must so un- derstand. Satisfactory Features I want to say that while we think we were entitled to more benefits than the Conciliation Board recommended, none-the- less we should look upon it as being, all things considered, a satisfactory award — particularly if it carries with it the desire of the Employers to treat our rela~ tionships with more respect and equality during the contract year, We think that the attitude of the Employers’ representative on the Board gave some indication that the Employers may be ready to treat us more like grown men in the future, rather than as the ‘little boys’ of the past. If such Proves to be the case then we will have come a long way, ina couple of months, toward a bet- ter understanding and better in- dustrial relations, Last year the Pulp and Sul- phite Workers received a 10.cent per hour increase (5 cents of which was a cost of living bonus tied permanently in the base rate). Two Years—19¥,¢ The Conciliation Board award gives us 14 cents per hour in- crease (9° cents of which is cost of living bonus tied permanently into the base rate). Thus, tak- ing last year’s five and one-half cents and this year’s fourteen cent recommendation into con- sideration, we*stand to receive 19%% cents per hour increase in wages, in a two-year period, which, by any standard of meas- urement, must be considered ‘quite good’. Your Negotiating Committee have performed their function this year in a thorough and com- petent manner. Their earnest ef- forts in behalf of the membership and their realistic approach ‘to complicated problems deserves your complete trust and support when you come to consider their recommendation that the Con- ciliation Board’s award be ac- cepted. Joe Miyazawa, Associate Di- rector of Research and Education for Canada, did a splendid job of digging up facts and figures in the preparation of the Union’s brief. His cool, objective ap- praisal of many factors has been a great asset to us, Many other men in the Union assisted us this year in advisory capacity: They are too numerous to mention and for fear of over- looking someone we just want to say ‘thanks’ to all those who, in any ‘way, contributed of their time and energy in our behalf, Smeal’s Work Good Last—but by no means least— Bob Smeal, our representative on the Conciliation Board, must come in for particular praise and commendation. We were most fortunate that a man of Bob Smeal’s ability and personality was willing to serve our member- ship in this capacity. 4 The Union’s prestige and case before the Board was greatly en- haneed by the fact that Bob is both a sound Union man and a sound independent thinker, ~ Fifty Gears Aigo - An important chapter in the labor per of British Colum- bia was told in telling language recently by Mamie Maloney in her column “In One Ear’, in The Vancouver Sun, : The B.C. Lumber Worker, in recognition of its significance to the trade union movement, reproduces the article below. In The Sun’s Fifty-Years-Ago feature the other day there was an item to the effect that “Ladysmith went wild with excitement as the coal strike ended and the men prepared to go back to work at the old terms.” é a The very next day it said the miners had reversed their decision to go back to work because of “new stipulations” by the mine owner, the “stipulations” being, of course, the “black list” which meant that the company wouldn’t give their jobs back to men who had been active in the strike. T’ve talked to old timers since I came to Ladysmith about that strike of 50 years ago and the one in 1912 which lasted for two years and which left a once prosperous town flat on its back for 20 years until logging came along to replace the coal economy which had been its mainstay. The wounds of those strikes are still not completely healed 50 years later. THE SCARS GO DEEP... Fifty years ago labor had no “rights”. International unions were unknown and the term “collective bargaining” hadn’t been heard of, Strikes were doomed before they even started. Yet, knowing the cards were stacked against them, that there wasn’t a chance of an eight-hour day ora decent living wage except at the discretion of the mine owners, Ladysmith coal miners were among those who made the early sacrifices. without which labor today would still be in the position of serfdom it occupied half a century ago. And the scars eft by that sacrifice are still apparent in this town. Families were split down the middle when one brother would give up and become a “scab”. The feeling is still there, even unto the third generation. - FOR A PRINCIPLE .. . Wives and children made the sacrifice too. One old lady has told me she owed over $1000 in grocery bills at the end of the strike. For months a local grocer, who also happened to be a friend of the mine owner, gave credit to the strikers. Then the mine owner came to him with the ultimatum that it would be the end of a beautiful friendship if he didn’t cut off their credit and refuse them food. The grocer, however, continued to hand out food through the back door. The strike cost him $8000 but he couldn’t see women and children go hungry. And go hungry the strikers did. But not the scabs. As a matter of fact it was flaunting his full lunch pail in front of the near- starving strikers’ families that caused a bomb to be thrown into a seab’s house. To protect the lives of his family he picked up the live bomb and threw it out. It cost him his hand. The militia was called. There was street fighting, windows were broken and houses wrecked. Some of the strikers went to jail, yet one of them, years later, was elected to the legislature where he saw many of the privileges he had so bitterly fought for become law. ONLY TIME CAN HEAL .. . The 1912 strike didn’t end. It petered out, When war came in 1914 the starving miners had no alternative but to jo up. Many, of course, had left the town to seek work elsewhere. You could buy a house for $50, For 20 years Ladysmith remained almost a “ghost town” until logging came into take up the slack. Since that time the combination of organized labor and a more enlightened attitude on the part of employers, coupled with good times, has restored prosperity tovthe town and helped to cover up the deep scars left by the old coal mining strikes. But the miners’ sacrifices were not in vain. If it hadn’t been for the determination of these men of 50 years ago, the willingness of their families to face economic disaster for the sake of a prin- ciple, labor would not have the security it enjoys today. , It’s been such a long hard struggle. Many lives were lost in long ago strike battles and tear gas and policemen’s truncheons were familiar implements in strikes up to 20 years ago. The rights that labor has won have been paid for in blood and tears, If some bitter- ness still remains it is not surprising. CARELESS PEOPLE — BRITISH DR. C. D. ORCHARD 1 Deputy Minister of Forests B.C. ~DEPARTMENT OF LANDS AND FORESTS CAUSE 60% ‘s FOREST FIRES! va-F r ST FIRES. COLUMBIA FOREST SERVICE : eM R. E. SOMMERS Minister es HON