is Trial qtish espionage system operat- mside the USSR was suddenly Sin March 1933- when a group Titish agents and ten Russians sanded up im the USSR and with espionage and sabotage on f British Intelligence. suing trial, involying among ‘ljan Monkhouse,-Leslie Thorn- § William MacDonald, disclosed fx formal association with the foftice of the Vickers Company freen for anti-Soviet activity. It » revealed at this trial that ire the surviving remnants of Hnet Allied-Toreprom plot for @ust the USSR. -hout the trial spokesmen for ish Government, together with m@.sh press, conducted a super- @:ampaign against- the Soviets attempts to becloud the issue, ‘acts could not be answered. sy Tukhachevsky EUSSR, as in ali countries, a Column had arisen in the years ‘e War consisting of corrupted revolutionaries, declassed mem- ehe former Russian rulers, and mt officers who had penetrated aunist Party and the Red Army s. Leading “lights” among these jineluded. Zinovyiey, Bukharin, Gen. TPukhacheysky and others. formed an extensive network it the USSR, conducted wide- botage resulting in the deaths sds of workers, destroyed vast 3, asSassinated leading Soviet and linked up with the German nese general staffs in the lat- for war. mR roups were eventually gather— d destroyed, but in the mean- 7 formed an integral part of tm anti-Soviet military espion- tm. Their direct contact was sn High Command, but behind an command stood the French, pove all — the British ruling ho were gearing: for an anti- ar. Rosengoltz, Rakovsky and = was discovered later, were n league with the British in- service. ‘ement, the instrument whereby = 2nch imperialism planned to re- rman militarism to spearhead Bed war on the USSR, was in & analysis the foundation stone ® rested the Trotskyite murder - apparatus in the USSR. mbetween 1935 and 1937 in a § trials the Soviet purged their #}| administration of these Quis- 2-cry of rage sent up by the rar-mongers could be heard @und the world. Every effort we, in the most fantastic press © of all time, to distort the true qj of the trials. But the interna- Gmifications of the Trotskyites cleanly from all the lies, and mmongers stood naked, indicted =n. ssement =:HOUT the appeasement peri- @1y step taken by the western gaits to instigate war was fought @er-measures initiated by the @ turn, the imperialists through Horate propaganda devices hurl- efter wave of scare stories, fake W\cIFIC TRIBUNE — PAGE 11 revelations, and twisted “facts” against public opinion in its desperate efforts toe ward away the truth. ; When the Soviets sought to build their socialist economy to brace them- selves for the coming test, they were met with economie boycotts, scares about “forced labor,” Soviet “dumping” and warnings that the Soviets plotted’ to dominate the world. “Iron Heel? Ben-_ nett, then prime minister of Manada, seized an opportunity in 1981 to reduce trade relations with the USSR to the vanishing: point; later to break off trade relations completely. For years the independent Soviet struggle against Anglo-French-Ameri- can appeasement—later on carried on in the League of Nations — was reviled as “war mongering.” When the Axis powers, in rapid succession, invaded (China, Hthiopia, and Spain, it was the USSR alone whch fought the suicidal policies of the big powers. In this, as in all else, the kept press yapped at ‘Imperils World Unity Atomic Diplomacy sabotage, war plots, slander. The present case——the smear cam- paign deriving from a fantastically ex- aggerated charge of Soviet spying in Canada—is merely an additional chap- ter in a long, long book. Hspionage and counter-espionage form a deep, ingrained pattern in the tissue of modern international relations. Any pretense that any state— Ganada in- eluded — does not conduct secret in- vestigations into the political, military and economic life of her neighbors, is so much eyewash and hypocrisy. “There are British spies,” Ernest Bevin, the present Labor government’s foreign minister said in 1933, “just as there are Russian spies, German spies, and French spies. There is not a nation which has a clean record in this respect. In this year’s estimates you will find $940,000 for secret service. Nobody is allowed to know how it is spent, or where it goes. Parliament may not dis- espionage and 1983: ‘There Are British Spies . . .’ “There are British spies just as there are Russian spies, German spies, and French spies. There is not a nation which has a clean record in this respect. In this year’s estimates you will find $940,000 for secret service. Nobody is allowed to know how it iS spent, or where it goes. Parliament may not discuss it; the auditor-general may not It is for espionage and any other dirty work which the government dare not openly avow.’’ — ask about it. ---Bevin Ernest Bevin in them every inch of the way. And still again, when the Russian statesmen de- nounced the ill-fated Munich pact, the usual chorus of lies rose up to heaven’s vafters to drown out the only voice of sanity. Coming of War FTER the war broke out in 1939 the whole sequence of courageous anti- Wazi steps undertaken by the Red Army (the occupation of half of Poland, the storming of the Mannerheim line, the cleansing of the Baltic states, the march into Bessarabia) were branded one by one as acts of “aggression” in rabid press campaigns which erupted with every event. Since VJ Day—-with the consistency of pyromaniacs—lying press campaigns have dogged the steps of every Soviet move made in the interests of interna- tional amity. The trial of the Polish saboteurs; the Soviet demand at San Francisco for a boycott against fascist Argentina; her indomitable stand at the UNO conference in defence of the Greek and Indonesian peoples; her insistence that Franco be permanently blacklisted from the councils of civilized nations— each of these in turn has been fought with lies, scares, alarms and wholesale slandering. Present Spy Scare goss ey and uniformly, the yecord is clear throughout: In their relations with the Soviet state, the Canadian, British, and American capi- talists have pursued a reckless policy of scares, intrigues, political and economic cuss it; the auditor-general may not ask about it. It is for espionage and any other dirty work which the government dare not openly avow.” This is a bald statement of a well- known fact. To believe otherwise is to be branded politically naive. The present issue, however, is not one of espionage or counter-espionage. It is a first-class political issue. In normal circumstances, whatever differences may have developed between the Soviet and Canadian governments would have been solved through ordin- ary channels. The Soviet note replying to Ottawa’s charges stated: ‘““The extra- ordinary fact that the Canadian gov- ernment published its statement on February 15 instead of — as is expected of countries maintaining normal rela- tions—previously asking an explanation from the Soviet government, causes amazement.” The undoubted fact emerges that Prime Minister Mackenzie King deliber- ately thrust aside normal diplomatic procedure to force a crisis in the rela- tions between the two governments. The fact emerges that King’s arro- gant behavior was not dictated by the needs of Canada’s national security but was a political manceuvre timed poli- tically to serve an ulterior political motive! The purpose dictating the spy-scare provocation—as it has always been in similar cases—-was to dicredit Soviet statesmanship the better to conceal the hand of reaction. It came at a time when the UNO conference in London had ruthlessly torn the mask from the face of “British colonial exploitation; when the dangerous game of United States atomic dpilomacy had become apparent to the whole world. The crisis in Canadian-Soviet rela- tions was blueprinted in Washington and london, and manufactured in Ot- tawa. “Russia in self-defence has every moral right to seek atomic_-bomb secrets through military espionage if excluded from such jnformation by her former fightine allies,” Joseph, E. Davies, form- er United States ambassador to Russia declared in a statement in which he con- demned C@anada’s spy seare. “Such ex- clusion is by inference hostile.” “We can’t have it both ways. Hither we obtain full confidence and co-opera- tion among. the large nations, or we shall find ourselves playing the old game of power politics.” The Path Before Us {ete path before every decent Cang— dian interested in the welfare of his country is lear. He must spurn the irresponsible mo- tives which dictated the present spy seare. He must urge his government to demand that atomic energy be shared with the Soviet people and thus destroy the spreading. cancer eating at the heart of international relations. We must in- »Sist that relations between the Soviet one-sixth of the world and the capitalist five-sixths be based on open diplomacy, on goodwill and friendship, and that nothing be allowed to destroy the mu- tual trust and confidence which six years of war had brought bloodily into birth. The King government has jockeyed itself into a position where it has be- come — in this instance — the mouth- piece of the atomic imperialists who -wish to shatter the unity of the peace— loving world. The cornerstone of international peace is the unity between the Socialist world and the capitalist world. In the terrify— ing years preceding World War II, Hit- ler smashed that unity. Today the same imperialist elements, in preparing them- selves for future international conflicts, are out to restore the same tragic divi- sions which in 1939 opened the doors of hell. And, be it noted, they are adopting the same strategy of provocation. “The King government’s action can only be characterized as an adventurist provocation on an interational scale,” Tim Buck said last week. “All the ele- ments are being prepared out of which an international crisis could easily de- velop. The entire perspective of inter- national cooperation between the Social- ist and capitalist sectors of the world is endangered.” The King government must undertake immediate steps to repair the damage its provocation has done to Canadian- Soviet relations and to the goal of per- manent world peace. The whole sordid history of international anti-Soviet provocation has shown—and six years of war has confirmed—the one unbreak- able fact that the peoples of the world stand together. Mr. King should remem- ber his own words to the House of Com-_ mons last year in which he warned the nation against “reviving the bogey of Bolshevism.” “The coming of the atomic bomb,” said Prime Minister Mackenzie King in a recent speech, “has opened our eyes to the appalling possibilities which will face the world if the United Nations should fail to achieve effective interna- tional cooperation.” Miz. King should follow his own ad- vice. There is no room in (Canada for the “Reichstag fire” mentality. FRIDAY, MARCH 8, 1946