reported that me time, of course, it ould help keep the wheels : industry going in Can- ta during the fried of reconversion. ‘These general views were idorsed by the House, and government has’ already ade a number of advances discussion with various yernment trade missions WILLIAM KASHTAN ‘t is worthwhile noting to om the loans have been ide. France will receive $242,- 9,000; the Netherlands and : Netherlands Fiast Indies will teive $150,000,000; Norway fl receive $30,000,000; Bel- im will receive $25,000,000; echoslovakia wall receive 7,000,000. The USSR has re- ved $3,000,000, with which ,, several Wa, skilled workers. z Co. ye nothing to do with the umercial press and radio. Feature Section _* by William Kashtan What is the meaning behind our recent ‘spy scare’ cancellation of orders for the Soviets’ vast _ potential markets? difficult - A TY THE last session of the House of Commons it was $750,000,000 had been assigned as ‘edit to a number of European countries. = the loans was to enable the respective countries to pur- aase goods, food and clothing from Canada with which to ‘construct their shattered industries, while keeping the j0r open for their retention as potential markets for Ca- adian goods once they got on their feet again. At the The purpose Of the $750,000,000 there is still a balance of approximately $283,500,000, presumably await- ing credit discussion with other countries, while in the House of Commons it was reported that negotiations are underway with Britain in respect to a eredit to the extent of $1,000,- 000 or more spread over three years. Thus the total Canadian eredits to be made available may reach a figure of two billion. That is an appreciable sum. But what is particularly sig- nificant is the fact that a whole number of countries in Eur- ope, particularly Hastern Eur- ope, have been left outside these arrangements. Poland, so far, has received no credit and neither has Yugoslavia, while the USSR has received the sum of three million, contrast- ed with $150 million for Holl- and and its present empire. This, despite the fact that Soviet spokesmen have fre- quently intimated they are pre- pared to make huge purchases of goods in Canada providing proper credit arrangements were arrived at. It would therefore appear that while the government, the bankers and industrialists speak about the importance of for- eign trade, and stress the fact that three out of eight Canad- jans are dependent for their income on exports, they never- theless exclude those countries which could purchase goods from Canada and thereby help maintain employment — always purchase hydro electrical provided appropriate credit ar- iipment. rangements were arrived at. MATA TT TTT TTT engineering plants in Vancouver have had ders: for the USSR cancelled on instructions from Ot- This has restilted in the laying-off of many scores Among those plants so affected are 2 Dominion Bridge Company, and the Heap’s Engineer- It is claimed that such cancellations of orders “spy scare,” but this ambigu- Ss contention is not borne out by the sordid chain of ents which have been screamed from the pages of the HCO TTT TT SEE ..- ; King Fronts For Atomic Diplomacy Pages 10-11 urope’s Peor omic le? KEEP OUR PLANTS WORKING! Juggling our foreign trade to suit reactionary political purposes will only result in se- rious losses to Canada’s potential world market. It will result in slowed-up reconversion, Stagnated industries and consequent unemployment. There are too many huge plants like the above in many parts of Canada, which have been shut down because of short- sighted government policy, influenced by reactionary interests. Why haven't decent credits been granted these countries? Are the terms so onerous as to endanger their national sover- eignty? Is the interest too high? Is it an attempt, to- gether with the USA and Great Britain, to exert eco- nomic pressure to bring about “desirable” changes away from nationalization and agrarian reform which, in fact, opens up a wider internal market-than ever in these countries? Is it an attempt to force changes in government in Hastern HEur- ope? Is a preferential policy being carried on in regards to the western European countries? Why then, the apparent dis- erimination against Hastern Europe? It would almost ap- pear that an economic bloc is being formed as part of the efforts to establish a western political bloc. Certainly such a policy will not be conducive to arriving at the goal of “high employment” that the govern- ment speaks of and pledged it- self to achieve during the fed- eral election campaign last year. Evidently the government reticent in regards eastern Huropean was not so to loans to countries when monarchies pre- vailed. According to the “Ca- nadian Balance of Internation- al Payments,” Chapter VI, page 44, “Canadian government’s eredits consist of the loans made by Canada to foreign governments insofar as these are still outstanding. Annual figures are available in the Do- minion Public Accounts. For the fiscal year ending March 1937, they were as follows: ad- vances to the Greek govern- ment, $6,525,000, and advances to the Romanian government $23,969,720.” , Obviously, what is needed is a progressive foreign policy which would include economic assistance to all nations, par- ticularly those that have suf— fered most in the war. Such eredits should be given with no political strings attached. Such a positive policy will be welcomed by the majority of Canadans. It will help streng- then the democratic forces of Europe and Asia while simul- taneously assuring work for Canadians. Both the labor moyement and progressive-minded people gen- erally should demand of the government that such a policy be pursued. Needless to say such a policy is doubly apparent and imper- ative in view of the cancella- tion of Soviet orders in the past few weeks. A tremendous potential market is closed and with it the possibility of achieving full employment un- less government policy is re- versed. It does not require any stretch of imagination to recog- nize that the weapon of eco- nomic pressure is being exert- ed against the USSR, undoubt- edly as a consequence of its consistent defence of the free- dom and independence of na- tions. That becomes even clear- er when one contrasts Canad- jan government policy in re- spect to the Netherlands. “Wie now have a stake in the maintenance of the Dutch Hm- pire to the tune of $150,000,000. That may, in part, explain the anti-Soviet campaign insti- gated by the King government. But it equally emphasizes the need to develop the widest pos- sible struggle for a progressive foreign policy which shall in- clude as one of its corner- stones, adequate economic as- sistanee to those countries that need it most and that suffered most in the war. FRIDAY, MARCH 8, 1946