re | t sm of an “Asiatic ¢o- ‘ity sphere,” the first their plans of world con- is crumbling today. But ganese fascists still hope, the Nazis, to be saved defeat by division and. + among the Big Five. of united Nations. They also on one other thing: ‘yelopment of inter-racial 5 and strife in America 4é Help of the colonial 's of the western powers | Pacific area. - )ecordance with this hope upanese are today step- ip their propaganda, de- » themselves more loud- nm ever to be the “cham- of the darker races.” vill be most dangerous to » or minimize the potency iis propaganda, baseless ih it is. If the lesson of xasy conquest of Burma, ya and other South Pacific earlier in this war has een learned, we shall pay ; dearly in the struggle to t Japan. . an imperial power Japan extended her dominations xgression over the 70,000,- seoples of Manchuria, Ko- 4nd Formosa, not to men- the millions more within more recently conquered rities. Japan is herself best evidence of the fact imperialism is not basical- question. of color but of omies. It is the dictator- in alliance with the ruling tary clique that must be accountable for the cruel ‘session of the supject mil- s in the Japanese empire. 7 @ 2AN joined the Alles in World War One for the sole sose of getting eontrol of “many’s ‘island colonies in ‘Pacific. This was arranged -ecret pacts which she enter- ‘into with England, Tsarist ssia, Italy and France. The wanese leaders had, in fact, joed for a German victory. TLIGER JOE AND JOHNNIE ARE TRYING TO KNOCK OUT A dA? SENTRY SO THEY CAN GET HIS MACHINE GUN... FROM A PERCH AGONE, | JOHNNIE THROWS A ROCK AT THE JAP..... by ON VCO, Japanese war. lords’ ‘brated each of Japanese finance capi- . Their newspapers openly .cele- German triumph. Even then, in the first World War, Japan énvisioned an agreement whereby Germany would have a freé hand in Eur- ope while Japan would rule Asia. Pao The defeat of Germany meant the necessity for the adoption of a new strategy of conquest. ._ by Japan. At the peace confer- ence she began to play her role as “champion” of the darker yaces by advocating the incor- poration of the principle of ra- cial equality in the peace settle- ment. This was a deliberate policy of undermining British prestige in the East so. that Japan might win over the ter- ritories held there by Britain and other western powers. Ignorance of Japanese impe- rialist aims: has led several Ne- gro commentators recently to point approvingly to Japan’s sponsorship of racial equality principles in 1919 without real- izing the motives behind this act. - With the establishment of the League of Nations, Japan sought an artful substitute for direct aggression. The Japan- ese leaders began to raise the slogan of “Asia for the Asia- ties” and to promote the idea of a Pan-Asiastic League. The appeal was widened to embrace darker peoples all over the world. These peoples, it was said, should unite under a strong leadership — naturally Japan’s — against their white oppressors. Japanese agents carried this mesage to the Phil- ippines, Siam, India, Ceylon and even to Ethiopia and the Uni- ted States in the early twenties. The Back-to-Africa movement sponsored by Marcus Garvey in the same period was based upon the same principle of racial separatism. The Japanese propaganda ef- forts failed. The agents gave up their tasks or were with- drawn. But in the next decade of the thirties, as Japan tulers Of Japan By Alphaeus Hunton jJaunched her attack upon: Man- churia, the slogans were again revived. The world-wide crisis of imperialism brought on _by — the depression launched Japan upon her career of open fascist aggression. “Our imperial spirit,” said Gemeral -Araki in 1932, ‘which is the embodiment of the union between the true soul of the Japanese state and the great ideal of the Japanese people, is by its nature a thing which must be propagated over the seven seas ‘and extended over the five continents. All obstacles imterfering with this must be destroyed with strong determination, not stopping at the application of real force.” The failure of the League of Nations or of the major world powers. to attempt to block the rape of Manchuria prepared the ground for Italy’s invasion of Ethiopia four years later. The Japanese government was prompt to offer its official re- cognition to Italy’s sovereignty over Ethiopia, and Mussolini re- turned the compliment by recog- nizing Japan’s dominion over Manchukuo (Manchuria). In 1936 these aggressors, together with Germany, sealed their par- tnership with the establishment of the anti-Comintern Axis. And the very next year, 1937, mark- ed the opening of Japan’s all- out invasion of China. The rest of the story needs no retelling. S regards the future of the Asiastiec peoples and other colonial subjects in Africa and elsewhere, there are two key problems of immediate urgency: the liberation of India and the welding of China into a unified, democratic, industrialized state. A strong China, free of the present internal strife of the yeactionary regime against the forces of democracy led by the Communists, is the main hope for-the abolition of both decad- ent feudalism and colonialism throughout the East. While our armed forces press forward, beating the Japanese military machine into submis- sion, we must address our- selves to these two tasks and to the problem of eradicating co- lonialism “in its entirety. Soviet Democracy Continued Thus the supply of fuel has been insufficient during 1944 and the first quarter of this year, creating a strain on the operation of our industries and municipal enterprises. But this doesn’t seem to bother the pet- roleum supply leaders and the coal supply authorities.” -Kuznotsov also roundly crit- icized the commissariats of non-ferrous meeals, heavy ma- chine building, and others. He was not the only delegate to ex- press discontent with the work of the state apparatus. Many asked for increases in monetary grants to their republics and provinces, and some of these re- quests were jncluded in the re- vised budget as finally edopted. So much for the Supreme So- viet, which, after all, is at the top of Soviet democracy. But how it is below? To under- stand the operation of some of the more unusual aspects of Soviet democracy this corre- spondent has had to recast his concept of democracy as a whole, from the point of view of its granted rights. The Russians understand de- mocracy, for example, as gua- ranteeing the right to work. Proceeding from this point of view the Russians attempt to exercise their democracy to ereate more work, to produce Hh Ye if” LOOKS LIKE WERE SUNK! AND NOW THEY'RE BOTH 1 HE'S TOLD THE OTHER NIPPO COMING UP AFTER US! ITLL TAKE A MACARTHUR TO GET y wow! YANK PLANES ! IT IS MACARTHUR! more to improve the. conditions of work. In factories, this as- pect of Soviet democracy is ex- pressed by meetings of work- ers, engineers, management, unions, at which measures necessary to improve output are debated, and at which all bar- riers to further industrial and social progress are discussed and then eliminated if possible. An interesting aspect of So- viet democracy is the right granted by law—indeed duty imposed by law-——upon the trade unions to elect public control- lers of stores and services. These controllers have the right to enter any store under their jurisdiction, examine prices, go into the quality ‘of goods, deal with complaints ‘and refer breaches of regulation to the courts. Soviet democracy is also ex- pressed in meetings of collec- tive farmers who govern their own community, create work plans, establish standards of pay, do what they. can to in- crease production to achieve greater income thus improving their own, and of course their country’s life. Friendly questioners in Amer- ica and Canada ask: “How can democracy function under a one-party system ?” Py ey a lS s\ pemines The Russians say frankly that their country is governed by the workers in alliance with the collective farmers. They admit that their democracy is a democracy of these two classes and the intellectuals. But in their elections any small group of citizens may nomi- / nate candidates, and even do so on the basis of whatever issues it pleases them, so long as these issues are within the frame- work of the above-described coneept of democracy. Commu- nists and non-communists alike are elected by secret ballot on the basis of their own individ. ual record. e The Russians do not look at their democracy as something complete and definite in itself. “Democracy is a historical phenomenon,” wrote Sokolov in his article in War and the Working Class. “One cannot speak of one unchangeable de- moecracy for all times and for all peoples. Present day demo- cracy bears little resemblance to the democracy, say, of an- cient Athens.” Sokolov draws some interest- ing conclusions: “It would be quite hopeless,” he argues, “to demand that democracy should be built up in all countries of Europe on the British or Amer- jean model. This would be a totally unwarranted attempt to interfere in the internal affairs of other peoples, an attempt to impose definite political canons upon them from the outside. Such an attempt would of course have no chance of success be- cause it would contradict the very spirit of democracy, the indisputable right of the peo- ples ‘to create democratic in- stitutions of their own choice!” Whether democracy is of the Soviet type or the American type, the Russians argue, it is still the same democracv in dif- ferent stages of its develop- ment. Its implacable enemy is fascism. That is why they say the test of a true democrat is hatred of fascism and devotion to the task of rooting it out completely. And in this work of exterminating fascism, the definition of democracy is the same for all—the right to live freely and govern themselves. The more perfect the demo- cracy, the more rights it gives to the people to live well and as they wish to live. SATURDAY, JUNE 30, 1945