Pn eee non aiitiscnbenonunminmnammnn anne tah eae ae HHAT DO YOU THINK? 2222 ae av cou aprarnaubiicaaaz atin seatceuaopift oars Wie 3 l@irs Scored il be most dishearten- myvere to think that the expressed in the col- 3 Pie Vancouver Sun by Nin any way reflected don in Canada. This © the Sun Editorial } particularly distin- mself with a series ‘9s modeled directly Hirst tripe ever pub- ' William Randolph ' other gladiators of ) ellow journalism. “have been amusing vt been so disgust- me put side by ‘side || write-up at the be- ‘last week, with the ' of what Mr. Molo- his broadeast open- © The two reports ‘| in the same issue . In one Wm: Ran- informed his read- big problem of the i vas—how to keep © in the other Molo- fas the other Big 'rs) informed the © 2ir deep conviction “Wy ference would be a - ies know .who Brown from San mike to suggest to hat it would be of ' p to the preserya- remnants of jour- = itation that may ' for him ,that a | shful thinking, ap- = | out of some very and considerably — prejudices, and a least in what he -r more reward. It )iank goodness, for = ‘mies to stop the se LOTY. a: —OBSERVER. re, if not in what . Women’s Future To The Hditor: Now that the war is over in Europe, and the Soldiers will return from overseas, the wo- men of this country are econ- fronted with a serious decision. We must decide whether we will go back into our homes as housewives, or jf Wwe will re- tain the place that we have- Won through our participation in this nation’s war effort. Our returning husbands will find us much different to the women he left behind. The war and all of the attendant changes in our Way of living has made us very different to what women were before this War. Women have worked as welders, rivetters. street .car conductors, and have filed in everywhere that men could be released for heavier work and the armed services. In doing this we have opened new door- ways to womanhood. Mrs. Dorise Neilsen, who is a shining example of a woman and a national figure, in her booklet “New Worlds For Wo- men,” has treated with this subject with admirable vision and foresight. In her book she lays down patterns for women that offer a lead as to the broad future that war-time necessity has opened for women. The old adage that the wo- man’s place is in the home has gone into the waste basket along with many other preju- dices. Women now must fight for recognition as an import- ant part of our national life. We must fight for measures that will release women from the bondage of housework; for day nurseries; for communal kitchens, for a better recogni- tion in the affairs of community and nation. The days of the kitchen Pe? ; 2 é $ qT members — | of the . led Nations + Ween Bh Tha io It. q janization nee 4D NATIONS ORGANIZATION ba Ga oy Hos > & S Permanent: CS SuK-US-USSR~ China, France Six temporary \( members elected 3 ADMINISTRATION ie) (SECRETARIAT) W.LB. Conada range and washtub are passed. omen must face the new life that the war’s end and the pro- mise of the future with the de- termination that they will enter- more fully into our national life. JENNY SINCLAIR. Criticizes CCF To The Bditor: I am one of those people who chooses to call himself a pol- itical non-partisan, and as part of my set objective to see all sides of any question, I am a regular reader of both your Paper and the CCF News. I might say that I was one of those people who chose to call himself politically non-partisan, because during the course of the last six months I have no- ticed a profound difference be- tween the views expressed in P-A and those expressed in the so-called socialist CCF News. The fate of the working class is inseparably bound up with the fate of the rest of man- kind, and yet to be guided by the editorial policy of the GCF paper, one would believe that the whole stream of human his- tory has no importance to the Canadian people. In the course of the last six months I have not tead one report of any sig- nificant happening in ‘world affairs in the CCF paper; 1 have not read anything but carping criticism of all of the ‘world’s attempts to solve the important questions that con- front mankind. Odiferous state- ments and sly destructive criti- cism, coupled with a fanatical hatred of all progressive forces -not firmly esconced in the CGF Ivory Tower seem to be the only content of their various departments. In short, the CCF, if their paper is any eriterion, are pursuing a policy that would have us believe that the world is mad, and the only rea- son left in the world is that embodied in the adventurist iso- lationist policies advocated in their rag. Lately the .CCF seem em- barked on a campaign of slan- derous red-baiting designed to create the same type of bogey in the minds of the Canadian workers as Hitler created in the minds of the German work- ‘ers. Their yellow journalism, at- tacking recognized leaders of the trade union movement, slur- ring other labor forces, solemn- ly predicting chaos and calam- ity out of which, like the Phoe- nix, the CCF will rise trium- phant, serve only to split the forces of labor and might well result in precipitating the people of Canada into a morass of poverty and destitution from which it might never arise. As one who feels he views the present situation with un- prejudiced eyes, may I com- mend the P-A and Labor Pro- gressive Party which it repre- sents, on the marvellous job that they both are doing to put the feet of the Canadian people on the path to prosperity and security. I well’ remember the days of hunger and the pogey, when my family were on relief and my two sons who are at present overseas were held in Bennett's slave camps. J. McGREGOR. May-12, 1945 == Page’ 5 Rieti caanay oreuunetunenenntasveseen=Pouutupsearssac snes iaytasessszttraiestotsevieestes siti siv ieee ih Shor t Jabs by Ol’ Bill Her reeaaaarera earDesDsteaubbensbostxprasbysa31 mtasfrssyesyiassi Tassie eaves ees = Victory FT WOULD not be fitting to send this column to press wi ing the feelings of the writer at the victorious ending of the agon the European people have suffered during the last Six years. ee Without the unity of purpose to destroy fascism, the victory would __ Forgetting the differences which kept them apart, the fundamental differences, economic and political, the United and all others, thought only of the in- terest they held in common enemy. 2 sae ef thout express- The military victory iS'a mile post in Social progress, but the sacrifices, the sufferinss, “the blood, the Sweat, the tears,” will have been endured in vain if a full measure of that unity is not maintained, for fascism Is not yet destroyed. The seeds must be destroyed as well as the fruit. Giving the ie to Themselves (Ee Canadian Forum is an unofficial organ of the CCF... theoretical analysis the inner circle of the i J Insofar as is concerned, its pronouncements are those of CCF, strategists and tacticians. In the, May issue, the latest, dealing with the coming. Donrinion elections in Canada, the editorial columns point to an entirely differ understanding of the possible outcome of this election than that being voiced by the common or cabbage patch variety of CCF spokesmen. In fact. they confirm our viewpoint. that the claims of the small fry tacticians of that party. that the CCF can elect a “socialist” government at the next election, is so much balderdash. Here are some excerpts from one of the Forum’s editorials of the May issue. “All the Signs. except the professionally optimistic _ fhus, from their own brain-trusters, comes the answer to the futile claims, the arrogant promises, the CGF are using to confuse the Cana_ dian people in what is undoubtedly the most crucial election since Con_ federation. 2 people to overcome the impassable barriers they see in the excerpts quoted above. ; In spite of the recognized facts admitted in the editorial, the CCF program-makers still promise “socialism,” to be introduced if a CGF overnment is elected in June, as the only means of dealing: successfully with the gravest questions that any Canadian Government has ever had to face, questions of life and death, not for individuals but for our country as a ywhole, 0) In spite of the political truths recognized by their own theoretical mouthpiece the CCE attempts to carry on by expelling every one of its members who makes any overtures toward any other organization which might possibly result in the return of a progressive government by which the rights of labor would be at least partially ensured. Her- ridge in the West Kootenays is the latest victim of this dog-in-the-man- ger policy of “no compromise, no political trading.” What they are doing actually is to sell out to Tory reaction. By refusing to enter into agreements on common objectives, they keep to: the front the essential differences between themselves and all other labor and progressive forces. forces split up into small sections. The Roman imperialists used to say “Divide and rule.” Today the CCF divides that Toryism may rule. But Toryism is not divided; the Tories know the value of unity. Deathbed Repentances WHEN a prominent atheist dies, one who is more or less. celebrated for his disbelief, stories are soon in cireulation telling how he “recanted” on his deathbed. It has been one of the stock arguments of the clergy in refuting atheism that the atheist always comes back to the fold on his deathbed. R. G. Ingersoll, who was nhot_an atheist but an agnostic is one good example of this in America. Ingersoll died peacably from a heart attack, sitting in a chair in his home. A few minutes before he ws found dead, his wife had spoken to him. No one else Was near him between that and the time she found him dead. Nonetheless, before he had been dead many days, the story was widely circulated that he had recanted of his anti-religious opinions on his deathbed. I¢ still circulates and is believed by people who know no better. Almost every other well-known atheist has had the same story told about him. A recantation from Mussolini would not be much of a build up for the church but if he had been a man of the same type as Ingersoll, the story would have been entirely different,