10 . I Continued | Canada Needs kind. There is also a growing realization that there must be something about the Socialist state that men, and women not only want to live under but are glad toe die to defend; are willing to destroy 25 years of work for and are willing to fight behind the lines for as well as in front of them. These things are having a tre- mendous effect on people’s think- ing and when peace comes this Soviet Union will not only be one of the four great powers—Bri- tain, the Soviet Union, the Unit- ed States and China—but the So- viet Union will be one of those great powers to which the world js going to look for guidance, for material help and for the es- fablishment of peace. And that power will be next-door neighbor ito nearly half the people of the world and a next-door neighbor to those nations of the world — China, India and the countries of the Far Bast—where tHe most far reaching changes are foing to take place. The Soviet Union will be a big factor in these events. | mention these things because for thinking people they are fun- damental. They are the things that are going to tremendously influence the world in the years immediately after the war. The Communist Party, or as I should say at the present time — the Communists in Canada—have held to a certain and very speci- fie group of opinions in these questions, and our opinions have not changed. We have fought con- sistently and I think I can say without flinching for the line of policy and ior the international alliances which are characteristic of the United Nations today, and we have fought for a line of so- cial development in Canada and throughout the world which has new become possible because of the result of the war and the change in world alliances. Mackenzie King And The Ban UT at the same time we find after careful investigation and patient negotiation that the King government is absolutely deter- spined not to lift the ban from the Communist Party. at least not until after the next Dominion election. The reason for the King government taking this position js not because of any deep repug- nance to Communist policy. They reason as follows: “Why should we lift the ban from the Com- munists? Who wants us to lift the ban from the Communists? The sf WE day, when I was a boy in Glasgow, my mother was wrapped in a paper called ‘Justice, in which was an edi- torial about ‘socialism. “That was a long time ago. In fact, Engles was still alive. But that editorial convinced me, and ever since Ive been -a radical. “T pelonged to the Socialist Party from 1907 until 1921, when an underground Com- miunist Party was organized in Canada. About 100 people erowded into an attic on Tor- onto’s Queen Street for the first conventon. Tim Buck was there, so was Harvey Murphy, and we called the new party the ‘Workers’ Party, “The police used every method of repression. There was a mine strike in Estevan, and the RCMP shot several miners and arrested the party jeaders. And eight members of the national leadership were soon arrested—Tim Buck, Tow Ewen, Sam Carr, Matt Popovich, Boychuk, AS nau; Malcolm Bruce and Tom Cacic. “J missed that arrest. I was in India, helping organize the indian trade union movement. After two months in jail I was deported home. I got back to find that while the eight lead- ers were serving five-year jail terms, the party had grown and expanded in influence as well as activity. The depression was on, and unemployment brought many to our ranks. “The party was particularly active in the trade union field. Where before the emphasis had been on propaganda, now we were organizing consist- ently. After about two and 2 Bill Bennett Says: sent me out to buy a herring» from a fish peddler. The fish half years, the leaders were released from jail, Tim last of all. Mackenzie King was elect- ed, and under public pressure lifted the ban on the party, which was declared illegal un- der the famous Section 98. “Since then the party has continued to grow. Our actiy- ity has always been directed towards unity of working-class people. We were anti-fascist at a time when fascism was fash- ionable. ‘Tye been in the Socialist Party, in the OBU, in a jour- neymen barbers’ union, in sev- eral laborers’ unions, in a woodworkers’ union. lve seen the labor movement in Can- ada mature. “And Vm convinced that Canada needs a new party of Communists, which will have the advantage of knowing the blunders we have made in the past, which Communists are always read to admit. Our Party will grow in the tradi- tions of Marx and Lenin.” Communists want us to lift the ban; the CCF, Social Credit and. the Tories. How many of them will vote for us even if we do lift ihe ban on the Communists? And who is it that is fighting against lifting the ban—who tell us not to lift the ban? The Liberals, A Party Of} people wno voted 10r the Liber- als, people who we may depend upon for yotes and a large num- ber of Tories who voted for tories in the past and might vote for us in the future if we don’t lift the ban. So, we are not going to lift the ban.” Next Two Years Decisive I CAN assure you this is abso- lutely true and we were faced with the question as to what should we Communists do. Have we got time to go through an- other year of fighting for the lift- ing of the ban. We have lost noth- ing during the past year. Believe it or not, the Communist move- ment has continued to grow dur- ing that period of trying to lift the ban, just as it grew before the ban was put op. Why? Be- cause through 20 years of activity the Communist movement has be- come rooted as a working class organization and has become identical with the struggle for everything the working class needs, in the struggle against all the things the working class fears and in the struggle for all those ideas to which the work ing class aspires. We will grow because our struggles are almost identical with those things which are in the interests of demo- cratic progress and particularly working class, but the fact is that ewe are compelled to question time. Have we the right, then, to sit back comfortably and carry on a campaign against lifting of the ban when now there is a very strong probability that the future of Canada will be determined in the next two years and that funda- mental changes will take place all over the world.in the next two years; that the governments, both provincial and federal, which will determine what line Ganada is to follow, will be elected within less than two years? From now on till December of next year, there will be six or seven proyincial elections in Canada and there will be a Dom- inion election in Canada and the governments elected at these elections will be the governments that will be running the provinces and the Dominion in the post- war years; they will be the Zov- ernments which will determine whether Canada shall stand on ihe international field for close cooperation with the USSR in carrying through the terms of the Atlantic Charter to give every people of every nation the right to determine the economic poli- cies they want and the type of government they want or if Can- ada shall line up with that grow- ing and very powerful body of reactionary opinion which is al- ready carryimg on an internation- al campaign in favor of setting up some sort of government in Europe which will be a continu- ation of the governments set up by the Versailles Treaty. This is the alternative confront ing the Canadian people and we must decide how we Can influ- ence the Canadian people most efficiently in just which alterna- tive they will accept. Pesition Of St. Laurent OW in this action we were helped quite considerably by the King government. Shortly after the dissolution of the Com- munist International and after I had learned that the King gov- ernment had determined there should be no lifting of the ban before the election, the Minister of Justice, Mr. St. Laurent, was asked a question in the House of Commons. The man who asked this queston 4s probably the most violent anti-Communist im the House of Commons, and is anti- communistie not because he knows anything about it but be- cause he was elected on that sort of program and means to stick with it. This gentleman asked the Minister of Justice the following question: “Mr. Speaker, I desire to place a question before the Minister of Justice. In view of the outlaw- ing of the Communist Party of Canada, is it the Minister’s in- tention to permit that party to hold an International Convention on the 21st of August as its lead- ership has announced?” (This is the Convention at which we propose to establish a new party.) What was the Minister of Jus- tice’s reply? “The form of the question at- tributes to the Minister of Jus- tice a jurisdiction and an author- ity which he doesn’t possess and which he has no intention of as- suming. It must be quite clear that the Minister of Justice can- not interfere with the right of Canadian citizens to hold a con- vention, provided that the objects and purposes of that convention are legal. If those who have pre- viously formed a part of the Com- munist Party desire, now, to rec- ognize that their old party is out lawed, to form a new party, of which the constitution, the ob- jects and the actions do not con- flict with the law, then what they do doesn’t concern the Minister of Justice; they are free to do as they please.” I think he went out of his way to announce that if the Com- munists of Canada should decide {o organize a new party, then that party will be judged on the basis of its program, constitution and its actions. It is a very funny thing—do you know that the pro- gram and constitution of the old Communist Party was absolutely according to law? They were drafted and distributed m tems oi thousands of copies. In 1922 when we first established the party as a public organization, eur program and constitution were absolutely according to the Jaw. In 1937 when we redrafted the program and constitution to bring them up to date, they were absolutely according to the law. And we shall meet in Toronto on August 21 and 22 and we shall draw up a new program and a new constitution and they also will be absolutely according to the law. | have no doubt about that and absolutely no fear that the department of Justice will find any fault with it. Parliamen | REGRET it is nec through all these i if it is necessary, % iB: jt is too much to ¢ — the Gommunist mm make its biggest co» democratic progress, | Why €an we mali contribution by re} forces in a national » cisely because greai 7 will confront Canad: «= two years will all b | on the field of parli = tivity. They will be © sues—the question policy, the question j policy, the question © lationships, and par: question of whether ™ ing forward or whe © going back. In Canada today ©. almost universal op #- democratic people tl = try must go forwar = war is over; there universal opinion t & has demonstrated i ¥ for tremendous imp — the standards of li want to go into it morrow at my pub will show that this in the standard of @ necessary because m 50 of all the working working for wages & half of what the goy } Canada Ai rVHE war has tran ada in more Wi First of all, it has Canada economical] & no longer the ect which it was before fore the war the was. still the bigs determining whats duced and what its’ for. The free mar jhe main determin to how many peor employed and how be unemployed. /. market was the ©? determining whethe be any expansion 0) dustry and under of industry that ext : take place. And al! of our governmer upon this. The basic policic | ernment in Canad 4 War were policies 3 ~ tain a scarcity; thai function of goyel | also maintained 1a but their main task tain searcity becat cannot thrive unlé maintained and pi maintained unless searcity of goods 2 eall some sort of iween the sufficient and the purchasing people. As the purchasint people declines, st of goods on the & decline and the g¢ forced to hel} searcity by t by subsidizin ment. All other Pp upon this general general necessity. compelled the §& change this. The \ the government to | aimed entirely atv onomic system of T in putting these Pp! fect. The Dominic has transformed € omy, Canadian et