4 = THIS WEEK: A Roundup r The War Allies Continue Gains On almost every war front this week Allied forces were registering steady gains against the Axis. One of the important phases of the conflict, the anti-submarine campaign, showed significant 1m- provement. During the month of May the increasingly deadly Al- lied convoy escort services sank more submarines than any othe” month of the war. Even the Nazis have been forced to admit that their toll of sinkings has been sharply cut down. Credit for this aceomplishment, which will fur- ther strengthen Allied preparations ‘for an invasion of the continent, goes to a greatly improved convoy system, now centralized under Ganadian command, with greater numbers of corvettes and the new frigates im use, combined with the recent addition of small airplane cariers which accompany Mmany convoys. The HEastern Front, with the exception of the Kuban, is still in a state of uneasy calm. Soviet planes continue to maintain air superiority after their recent feat of knocking down or destroying on the ground some 2,000 Nazi aircraft in little better than a month. Red Air Force pilots con- tinue their heavy attacks on Ger- man supply centers and concentra- tion points, and nowhere have they been seriously challenged by the Luftwaffe. In the Kuban the Red Army continues to draw closer its ring around Novyorrosisk. Some observers believe it pos- sible that Hitler will delay his threatened offensive against the Red Army until he can determine what the Allies will do in Western Burope. But Red Army spokesmen express their belief that the Nazis will attempt a big offensive against Soviet positions in an attempt te weaken the Red Army, hoping then to be able to transfer troops back to France and threatened Balkan points. New Threat to China One of the gravest threats to the United Nations lay in the Japanese big three-pronged drive against the Chinese armies, with the probable destination Chungking. Even here, however, a magnificent stand’ by the poorly- equipped Chinese troops this week inflicted a sharp setback to the Japanese and lessened for a time, at least, the danger to China's provisional capital. Wevertheless, the Japanese push had surged westward along the Yangtze River, clearing the great waterway between Hankow and Tchang, and attempting to seize control of the western outlet of the 120-mile stretch of Yangtze gorges through which Chinese sup- plies are fed to the central front. Two factors weigh in favor of the Japanese. One is the fact that up to now supplies from United States, Canada and Great Britain have been woefully small, with the result that the Chinese armies are not only ill-equipped, but out- numbered because lack of arma- ments. makes it impossible for China to make full use of its man- power. The second factor is the regrettable position taken by Chiang Kai-shek in respect to the Communist Highth Army, a posi- tion which has robbed China of the services of its most potent fighting force. The first factor may be over- come soon as a result of decisions made at the recent Churchill- Roosevelt talks in Washington, Where more material aid was promised embattled China. The scond factor is still to be tackled, but until it is, China will continue to fight with only part of its po- tential strength. Exploding the “Fortress” Myth The more sober among the military experts took time off this week to examine closely the Nazi claims to have erected an impregnable wall around Europe’s Atlantic seaboard. Berlin claims the fortress of Europe is impregnable. And there are many people in Canada and United States seemingly only too ready to ac- cept the Goebbels’ statement, since to accept his conclusion is to ac- > a8 These are the remains of Ying-tan, China, after a Japanese a Sy = army of revenge had all but wiped it off the map. Jap- anese infantry burned, looted, raped and slaughtered in a frenzy of fascist beastliness and hate against Chinese civilians accused of aiding American fliers who participated in the bombing of Tokyo in 1942. cept also the theory that the Allies are not yet prepared to tackle the job of cracking that wall; there- fore, no second front in Europe this year. Any clear analysis of the Ger- man claims to having built an im- pregnable “Atlantic Wall” reveals the falseness of that boast. On April 10 the Nazi miltary commen- tator General Dietmar asserted in a broadcast that ‘In many respects the new Atlantic Wall resembles the old one, but in every respect is a far more gignatic edifice.” By the “old one” he meant the famous Siegfried Line built in 1937-39 to surpass the Maginot Line. A little calculation on this will reveal some absurdities. The Siegfried Line stretches about 360 miles. Its construction required about 6,000,000 tons of cement — one-third of Germany's annual producttion—and 7000,000 cubic yards of timber. Protective obstacles alone required 3,000,000 rolls of barbed wire, while every mile of the Line absorbed 16,000 tons of cement and 2,500,000 man-hours. With these figures in mind, an examination of General Dietmar’s claims prove all the more unbe- lievable. He would have us be- lieve that the Germans have built an Atlantic Wall far more gigantic than the Siegfried Line, stretch- ing some 3,000 miles along the Atlantic seaboard of Europe. This is telling us that in a year the Ger- mans have laid 150,000,000 cubic yards of concrete, some 50,000,600 tons, though German pre-war pro- duction amounted to only 12,000,- 000 tons. Even the output of the occupied countries could not fill the gap. In addition, the work reported by Dietmar would have involved 7,500,000,000 man-hours, or the uninterrupted work of 750,- 000 men during a whole year. Again, if the fact that the actual length of the European coast coast from Narvik to Salonika, 8,000 miles, is considered, Dietmars’ arithmetical calculations become astronomie and completely absurd. The truth is, any talk of solidly fortifying the European coast is the wildest kind of nonsense. What has been done is to fortify the most likely points from an invasion viewpoint. This of course leaves the unlikely ones to be attacked, which is what will be done. The mein attack could be launched from England to France, with holding operations against the southern wall and a mighty blow by the Red Army against the cen- ter. By such a move, victory in the main will be won before the sec- ond world war becomes longer than the first—before the turn of the year. US Labor The Machinists’ Withdrawal Withdrawal of the International Association of Machinists with its 565,000 members from the American Federation of Labor has thrown further-light on the dispute within the American Jabor movement — both AFL and CIO—between those who support the people's war against fascism and those who follow the isolation- ist, pro-fascist policies of the Hoovers, the Wheelers and the John L. Lewis crowd. The vote to leave the AFL, after 43 years, was four to one. The TAM, in theory a craft union, has recently organized on an indus- trial basis taking in all workers in aircraft and machine-building plants. Under this policy, it has more than doubled its member- ship, with strong industrial locals in aircraft plants on the Pacific Coast and across Canada. The IAM’s organizing policy im- mediately brought it into conflict with jurisdictional claims of other AFL unions, most important being the United Brotherhood of Carpen- ters headed by William Hutcheson, first vice-president of the AFL and head of its Construction Trades Department. The dispute be- tween the Machinists and the Carpenters simmered for many years, coming into the open in heated fights which were often the only matters of contention at an- nual AFL conventions. The Ma- chinists were consistently outvoted. Whenever the Machinists’ position was upheld by the AFL executive council, Hutcheson ignored the de- eision. At the last AFI convention Hutcheson threatened to withdraw 600,000 carpenters if the convention voted for the Machinists. Although, as a result, the Machinists’ claims were voted down, the majority of delegates significantly refrained from voting. The jurisdictional dispute, suffi- cinetly sharp in itself, was further embittered by basic differences in policy. On the AFL executive coun- ceil, Harvey Brown fought along- side AFL President William Green and Daniel Tobin, president of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, to uphold the win-the- war position of President Roose- velt. On the other hand, Hutcheson and Matthew Woll, second AFL vice-president, who are both lead- ing figures in the Republican Par- ty, conducted a running campaign against Roosevelt, against unity with the GIO or international labor unity, against labor participation in government agencies and against labor’s no-strike decisions. Well for many years was president of the National Civic Federation, an anti-Soviet strike-breaking or- ganization backed by reactionary industrialists. Hutcheson was in- fluential in the America First Committee, and in the last three campaigns was head of the Labor Division of the Republican Party. In’ matters at present decided by small groups of officials—such as international labor unity—Hutche- son and Woll carried the majority. In larger political matters, on which the feelings of the AFL rank and file were brought to bear— such as the AFL's stand in presi- dential elections — Green, Tobin and Brown determined policy. Hutcheson’s proposal two weeks ago to readmit John L. Lewis and the United Mine Workers threat- ened to risrupt this delecate bal- ance, The aid of Lewis—whose fol- lowers in CIO unions provoked the disastrous strikes in auto and rub- ber plants — would enormously strengthen the opposition of Woll and Hutcheson to America’s alli- ances, to Roosevelt, and to meas- ures designed to win the war. Lewis’s application, however, which at first met with little op- position, is now regarded more so- berly. Opposition to the move has risen among AFI. unions and among the coal miners themselves. A three-man committee to consid- er Lewis’s application—consistinge of Woll, Hutchson and George Harrison, president of the (Rail- way Clerks and» a supporter of Roosevelt—was sharply revised af- ter a violent scene, between Tobin and Green in the corr Washington office build then replaced Hutchesor Meanwhile, an editoria’ ficial organ of the In | Ladies’ Garment Wor week bid welcome to Le dent of the ILGWU, Da sky, who helped form th was known as a Rooseye er, later returned to the recently has encourage: strike movement by 4 ger s =s Will Mannin “What next for A ability of the Alberta activities of the Soa anti-Semetic propagande nomic confusion is fing government funds and | by the late Premier chosen few loyal apostli called ‘‘specialists.” To that they are able tc these activities, to that they be able to ove monetary reform, 4i misleadership threatenin gress and expansion of progressive movement | Hon. E. C. Manning, aide, is the new Premiel he has sufficient bius into the pattern cut ou hart remains to be seen. was unfortunately a go the “man of the hour’ in the adulation accord premier. : Gonfusion had long guiding principle Of policy and recent utt some of his “advisors the fore the inherent f acter of the propagan out from the legislatiy in Edmonton. While at the incept social credit movement political pronouncement pulpit of his Prophetic , tute in Calgary were é many sincere followers est expression of a desi the lot of the have-5 apparent to the more astute was the under labor, anti-Jewish char speeches and writings together of ‘Nazism, Sa fascism” as ‘one and thing” as late as Decer year did nothing to b berta people understan issues confronting our tempts to unify the pe! collective security mi pre-war years, and 1s all-out war effort, we upon by Aberhart and” the faithful few who SI Le Humphrey - No one has ever of being a diplomat, labor. He proved h occasion was his aD that the federal depat bor was considering T hiring of seamen from tion of the Manning placing the responsibil lective Service. Such an important ¢ bor policy affecting se overdue. It has been organized seamen on Logically the announce have come either dire! his department or rele