| nion Charges Diserimination eamens Manning Vool Setup Scored he © Inlandboatmen’s Union of the Pacific, in presenting for , #)orsation of council a resolution protesting “unnecessary (es and indecision which will do nothing but injure the war *t’ in reference to an applica- for wage revisions made hby- mion some seven months ago. ini} srsing the resolution, the coun- rill also request the CCL na- “wl executive to intervene on 2 (if of the seamen. i statement read to the meeting .@ mith stated: nm November of last year our nization presented a brief to YWLB asking that basie rates phe crews of Park steamers sacreased by $15 per month § cost of living bonus for ali iifications. The cost of living \B has been paid. On Decem= {0 we received a letter from chief excutive officer of the si stating that they were wait- Gr submissions from the em- “Sitly in January we noted a = by the shipowners to lower mevage scales of the two ships 2d cited as comparisons. We ™ ipon sent another letter to imf Neilson asking if anything “ideen done in this case. In sai days we received an answer we S in part that “the crews @Se vessels are recruited in main from men who have ® the manning pool in Van- r so the application does not ine with which the board can ‘ly deal.” would seem by this that a m0 whe joins the manning | @ loses his rights as a citizen mada. Every time our or- ation makes a move we are a with a fight to determine i government, if any, has ge liction over the seamen.” Statement that the crews “ruited in the Manning pool I correct, according to Smith, Mee ated that the crews of the