x Page Six THE ADVOCATE THE ADVOCATE Published Weekly by the Advocate Publishing Association, Room 20 163 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, B.C, Phone TRinity 2019 EDITOR - HAL GRIFFIN One Year $2.00 Three Months _____—___$ .60 Half Year $1.00 Single Copy: = Ss 205 Make All Cheques Payable to: The Advocate VANCOUVER, B.C., FRIDAY, MAY 17, 1940 Detend The People’s Press Coherent upon the attacks now being made upon the Canadian labor movement, the printers of the Advocate this week insisted upon telephoning Attorney-General Gordon Wismer at Victoria before proceeding with this issue. Attorney- General Wismer was noncommittal. “I have no information and therefore I can give you no opinion,” he said. In face of the campaign of fear and intimidation now being directed against the labor movement and its press we call upon the people to translate our slogan “Defend the People’s Press’ into a living force by bold action. We call upon all trade unions and progressive organizations to lose no time in directing reso- lutions to provincial and federal governments defending their right to a free press. Reaction must not be allowed to gag the labor movement by silencing its voice. The threat to the Advo-— cate must be countered immediately by the united protest of the progressive labor movement for which it speaks. Vancouver Wants No Vigilantes HE fact that the Sixth Column is making its anti-alien agitation the basis of its demand for compulsory registra- tion of British subjects makes it a particularly dangerous pro- ponent of conscription—for that, in plain words, is what the euphemistic term compulsory registration implies. And there are many indications that, despite all promises to the con- trary, conscription is contemplated. Formation of the Sixth Column follows the lavish publicity given by the daily press to its ‘discovery’ of a Nazi ‘Fifth Col- umn’ in South Vancouver where there is a large German population, predominantly anti-Nazi and anti-fascist. This press campaign, designed to whip up chauvinism and hatred, has already had its sequel in acts of vandalism committed against two German churches in South Vancouver. Wild rumors were circulated that Nazi victories in Norway had been celebrated at a third church. Investigation proved this ‘victory celebration’ to have been a regular prayer meeting. But where was the daily press in the years leading up to the war when this paper, alone of all papers in this province, exposed Nazi propaganda and organizations in Canada? Where was the daily press when this paper exposed Italian fascist activities in Canada? And where was the daily press when this paper presented factual data to prove Japanese fascist activities in British Columbia? It was too occupied in offering slavish praise to the policy of surrendering the small powers to Nazism to concern itself with fascist activities in Canada. It could only call those who fought for a policy of collective security against fascist aggression ‘warmongers.’ This paper has taken a consistently anti-fascist stand, which is far more than can be said of some of those who a few weeks ago were vowing to end Hitlerism and are now urging ven- geance on the whole German people. It believes that the German people themselves must overthrow Hitler and destroy fascism. And it believes that in the guise of a war against fas- cism the democratic liberties of the Canadian people are threatened by the War Measures Act and the formation of groups which advocate fascist methods. This paper owes its allegiance to the Canadian workers and farmers who make its publication possible. For their interests it has consistently fought and will continue to fight. It does not believe that the workers’ interests will be served by setting Finnish and Scandinavian workers against British- born workers, as some misguided individuals advocate. It is true that, as one speaker at the Canadian Legion’s meeting the other night despairingly cried, “Our sons and daughters can’t get jobs.” But he should have blamed, not foreign-born workers, but those monopolies now reaping super-profits from war orders which exploit British-born and foreign-born work- ers alike and know no race prejudice in investment of their capital. It is only a few months since a press campaign similar in many respects to that now being waged in Vancouver led to destruction of the Finnish Workers’ hall in Aberdeen, Wash., by a vigilante mob. This campaign, incited by the big timber barons, culminated in the brutal murder, still ‘unsolved,’ of a CIO official’s foreign-born wife. This shadow of vigilante terror must not be extended to British Columbia. The labor move- ment must act promptly. Aiding Conscription wit many of the sentiments expressed by Mayor Lyle Telford from time to time the Advocate has been in general agreement. We agree with him when he says that profiteers should be banned. We agree with him when he states that the profiteers should be taxed to pay for this war. But we cannot agree with his latest proposal to register all male citizens of Vancouver. All Germans and Austrians are not Nazis. Many of them are anti-fascists who were threatened by the Nazis because of their convictions in that period not long past when no curb was placed by the authorities on Nazi activities. We say, intern not only Nazis but all fascists and their sympathizers, many of whom today occupy key positions in Canada. What about prominent Vancouver businessmen like Leo Sweeney who, some two years ago, expressed admiration for Hitlerism and defended his views before Vancouver Trades and Labor council? If the Nazis have a ‘Fifth Column’ here it is among certain Canadian fascist sympathizers that it will be found. We suggest that Mayor Telford investigate this aspect of ‘Fifth Column’ activities. It would be fruitful work. By lending himself to registration proposals the mayor is permitting himself to become the tool of those interests cam- paigning for conscription. Registration in any form is the prelude to conscription, and pledges that registration will not be used for conscription will prove in 1940 as worthless as they were in 1917. Moreover, did Mayor Telford stop to think that compulsory registration will constitute an ideal blacklist for use by the employers? We do not think he is prepared to place a potent weapon in the hands of his enemies. Because his proposal is counter to the interests of the labor-progressive forces that elected him we urge the mayor to reconsider be- fore it is too late. 5 de UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE By H. MURPHY President of Ontario Federation On Unemployment éqN MANY minds jobless insurance is an essential war mea days ahead.” ble sure as it offers a form of compulsory saving to meet depression This is what John Magor, British United Press correspondent at Ottawa, reported on May 5 anent state- ments that at the present session of parliament the legislation promised by Prime Minister Mackenzie King since 1919 is to be introduced. : In this report Magor cited one of the arguments now being ad- vanced in favor of unemployment insurance by big business spokes men who in the past have con- sistently opposed such legislation. These arguments run along the §eneral lines that: 1. Because un- employment is reportedly less now and is expected by them to become non-existent, a large re- serve should be accumulated dur- ing the war, so that after the war when unemployment will be gen- eral a big fund to meet it will be available, and 2, as advanced at the Manufacturers’ Association in an attempt to justify huge war profits, a situation of ‘ecatastro- phic dimensions’ can be expect- ed after the war and therefore manufacturers must pile up huge reserves and profits for that ‘Tainy day’ when peace comes. For the same reason, unemploy- ment insurance must be intro- duced to build a fund for that Same ‘rainy day,’ But how will the government’s proposed unemployment insur- ance scheme work? In the first place, it will be a contributory plan, applying only to those work- ers in a position to make their regular contributions; this means steadily employed workers. In the second place, it will not cover those industries where employ- ment is Seasonal; this means that loggers, sailors, longshoremen, domestic workers and farm labor- ers will not be included. In the third place, in order to accumu- late a fund, payments from both employers and employes would be started immediately, the employ- ers’ contributions being charged to wages. Thus the employed workers will start to build up this fund with the probable stipulation that con- tributions must be made over a certain period before a contribu- tor becomes eligible for benefits, or alternately, that no payments will be made to unemployed workers ‘for the duration.’ Those now unemployed and those rendered jobless during the war will be compelled to exist on increasingly inadequate relief al- lowances where they can be ob- tained or to take charity. T THE same time as Graham E. Towers, president of the Bank of Canada, was advising the people to restrict their expendi- tures on commodities and seryv- ices not essential to the war, the King government, which lifted the five percent restriction on profits from war orders, was un- dertaking economy measures at the expense of the poorest sec- tion of the Canadian people—the unemployed on relief—and order- ing drastic cuts which have vir- tually reduced relief allowances by 50 percent. Thousands of people have been cut off relief with no hope of obtaining employ- ment, Big business spokesmen with an assumed optimism belied by official figures claim that unem- ployment is disappearing in the Inmagic solvent of war contracts. Perhaps they can delude them- selves into believing that because profits are ascending in sharp curves the people likewise must have more money. Perhaps they think that the mere fact of the government's wholesale reduction of relief appropriations in itself is leading to greater employment, Or perhaps they are trying to create an impression which is easily dispelled by figures pub- lished in the Labor Gazette. In the April issue of the Labor Gazette the following figures on unemployment are given: In Sept., 1939, there were 539,013 persons on relief, 488,984 in ur- ban areas, 50,029 in rural areas, But in Feb., 1940, there were 745,- 000 persons on relief, of whom 636,000 were in urban areas and 109,000 in rural areas. These fig- ures in both instances fail to take into account the thousands of unemployed persons not receiy- ing relief, the men and women disqualified on various grounds, the transient unemployed and the jobless dependent on their fam- ilies. it can, of course, bes argued that during September there is more seasonal employment and that the apparent increase dur- ing the first six months of war does not represent the actual sit- uation. But comparing the fig- ures for Feb., 1939, and ¥Feb., 1940, it is clear that while there has been a drop in farm relief there has been little decrease in city relief. In Feb., 1939, there was a total of 1,018,667 persons on relief, but more than 389,400 of these were in rural areas. (hae are no grounds for be- i lieving that work for the ma- jority of Canada’s unemployed will become available during the war. While war industries, it is true, are expanding, there is an increased speedup with greater machine production per indivi- dual. At the same time there is increasing unemployment in other industries. Public works are at a standstill. There is little read construction. The building trades are slack. Many overseas markets are closed, while ship- Ping restrictions are further cur- tailing those markets still open. Heavy taxation and rising prices are reducing the living standards of the people. The dictum that living standards must be sacri- ficed to war needs is leading the majority of the people into great- er poverty. Only the financial Statements of the big monopolies with their swollen profits justify the optimism of big business. For the people there remains the prospect of reduced social serv- ices, lower grants for education, atrophied relief allowances and HOW PARIS WORKERS MARKED COMMUNE now a new wage levy to restrict still further their consumption power. It is vitally important that em- ployed and unemployed workers continue to press. for real unem- ployment insurance that will cover the needs of those now un- employed and that they expose the scheme to impose a compul- sory wage tax on those now em- ployed in the guise of unemploy- ment insurance. Real unemploy- ment insurance can only be of a non-contributory character, de Signed to cover all unemployed persons regardless of industry. it should be sufficient to provide @ decent standard of living and it should not be based on low re- lief rates that have led to deter- ioration of employability. The fight for social services — Must be continued. Why should War costs be met at the expense of the poorest of our people? The alternative to reduced relief with no available employment for Gan- © ada's unemployed youth, to the ~ slum conditions of our Cities, is the imposition of-heayy taxes on the big: monopolies whose fig= ures reveal beyond question the profits now being made. THE FORUM OF THE PEOPLE [Peete are invited to send in letters for publication i under this heading. Letters may be written on any sub- ject, but they must be concise because of space limitations. Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Advocate. Cost Of Intervention To the Editor,—In reviewing the pamphlet Finland and the Soviet Union, I find very important figures were omitted on page 26. According to excerpts taken from Winston Churchill’s papers, Britain spent nearly $300,000,000 in efforts to defeat the Soviet Union in 1918.. France spent half that sum, but no estimate was given on what it cost Canada, US and other countries which had armies in Russia. At that time the Soviet Union was struggling in its infancy, when famine stalked the land, mines were flooded and many in- dustries wrecked by whiteguards to prevent the workers from using them. In brief, these were some of the great obstacles the new-born re- public had to contend with and yet it survived and flourished un- til today the USSR now occupies a very formidable position to talk peace and conduct trade pacts With any country in Europe, or defended itself against aggression. It was the Soviet Union that stopped Hitler's march through Poland, and many people now commend, when they formerly condemned, the prompt action of the Soviet Union in saying mil- lions of lives and prevented de struction of valuable property, The people of Poland vwel- comed the intervention of the So- viet Union after their government and nobility fled, and it is very encouraging to note Britain and France do not intend to ques- tion or contest the annexed ter ritory now incorporated in the Union of Soviet Socialist Repub- lies. - —A. GM. . Vancouver, BC. Polities In The Trade Unions To the Editor,—I am ‘surprised’ at Jamieson, Showler and | Bengough, the so-called labor leaders, introducing politics in the trades council, because Jamieson at one time supported the Non-Partisan League candidate, whose main plank was ‘No politics at the city hall” Now it appears that he and Bill Green of the American Federation of Labor, are introducing politics into Canadian unions and Vancouver Trades and Labor council. Jamieson . must have had a change of heart. Northlands, BC. OLD UNION MAN. May Day Statement To the Editor,—The 1940 May Day committee has asked me to request publication of the following financial state- ment: INCOME Cash Balance, 1939 __.._.._....... Donations, 1940 -.......-...-2..---...-- Collections on May Day -.......... Advertising Proceeds -.............. qe months ago, on March 18, Paris workers celebrated the anniversary of the Paris Commune, not by great open parades as in former years when 100,000 workers marched past the Pere La Chaise cemetery to exchange salutes with Maurice Thorez, Marcel Cachin and other leaders of the now outlawed Communist party, but in little groups. The demonstrators arrived in groups of two or three, per- haps as occasion presented itself, of a dozen or more. By a strange coincidence, every mourner carried a bunch of red flowers. If he or she carried the national tricolor, the white and blue were casually folded away in order not to hide the red. If some were humming the Merseillaise, how could the watchful gendarmes and Gardes Mobiles take exception to the French revolutionary hymn that is now accepted even by the Daladiers, the Blums and the Flandins in the seats of power? And if some by chance murmured the words of the Inter- nationale, what answer could the police give to the simple explanation that this time, born in the Paris Commune itself, was surely appropriate for its anniversary? Moreover, if some of these Paris workers, pausing by the graves of the murdered Communards and saying softly, “T iberte, Fraternite, Egalite ou la mort,” by chance added, “Les Soviets partout,” what could the gendarmes do? The perpetual wreaths on the graves of the Commune leaders glow richly red as if they were drenched with fresh blood; the simple tombstones in this magnificent cemetery bear testimony to the terror the leaders of the Commune faced. All France remembers it, because this is a national tradition that even bourgeois historians dare not completely obscure. And the working class men and women who for years have led the fight against fascism are not afraid of batons. i oe i *s Paris, with its As Marx wrote in May, 1871: “Workingmen's , wit Commune, will forever be celebrated as the glorious harbinger of a new society. Its martyrs are enshrined in the great heart of the working class.” . Advertising Program (receivable) Total Income 3.2 EXPENDITURE Printing: ..c600.). cee i ee $ 91.20 Sound Erucks 22 oe 50.00 CCE Band ee ee ee 20.00 Guest Speaker's Travelling Expenses —..---.--------- 20.00 RadiovAdvertising 6.5 14.00 Secretary, Ss: Mxpenses=..< 2 < eee 9.90 Banners (Material and Painting) _...W.- 2. 7.16 Carfare (Committee Members and Band) —............. 6.25 Publiett ys Gar: 55 ee ee 6.00 Stationery and Stamps 2=<.--.. = 5.40 Platform (Decorations and Cartage) .... 4.50 RPWU: Hloatierize:) eee eee 5.00 Miscellaneous =. toe ee ee 10.33 Accounts Payable: Broadway Printers (Printing) —_....... ee The Advocate (Advertising) —...... The Federationist (Advertising) Housewives’ League Prize... ee Total’ Mxpenditurces: 2.5. ns eee A Dprge sxe BRE Bas) Seas ess ee i Eal clo} eal 4 se pe ee ere ee 265.39 MSCS SU ee ee $ 15.31 The May Day committee takes this opportunity to extend its appreciation to all organizations and individuals assisting financially in this year’s celebration. Donations from organizations which have not yet con-| $ tributed will be appreciated, in view of the deficit. All funds | should be sent to James Thompson, May Day Committee chair-) man, 138 Hast Cordova street. ~ Vancouver, BC. a