THE ADVOCATE Page Five ) So that no one will accuse us of lisrepresenting Prime Minister ‘ing, let us repeat his words of spt, 8, 1939, when he declared | the House of Commons: 7 «J note that Sir Harry Gul- |} stt, Australian minister of ex- ‘ermal affairs, told the Austral- an house of representatives on '¥Yednesday that his govern- jaent had not yet seriously con- idered despatching an expedi- jionary force overseas. |. “He declared that when the commonwealth had discharged ‘ts first duty to the empire, which was to ensure its own safety, and when it was better able to assess the strength of its enemies and the nature of ‘the conflict, it would evolve proposals for further partici- pation in the war for submis- sion to the people. | “That statement indicates the Australian government are making the same general ap- ‘ Ganadians who remember and .onor the struggles for demo- ratic liberties of those ‘others,’ Nilliam Lyon Mackenzie, Louis foseph Papineau and Louis Riel, will also remember those words Prime Minister Mackenzie cing on the day that Britain de- lared war on Germany. Today hey have a very hollow sound. Evidently Prime Minister Mac- cenzie King was not thinking of is well beloved ancestor when te referred to ‘others.’ Fer long before he uttered hose high sounding words, long efore war broke out, Mackenzie inge’s cabinet was preparing in ) eadiness for war regulations ‘ vhich would abrogate every dem- scratic right won by the Cana- jan people in those early strug- les, San a2 e@ WN March 14, 1939—not last year, but the year before— ‘ighteen months before the Can- idian government declared that . state of war existed between tself and the Hitler regime, a sommittee to draft the Defense £ Canada Regulations was ap- >ointed by Ottawa. The previous day Hitler had marched triumphantly into Aus- ria. : Seventeen days later, Prime Zinister Mackenzie King declar- d in parliament: | “The idea that every twenty years this country, which has done all it can to run itself, should feel called upon to save 2 continent that cannot run it- self seems a nightmare and sheer madness.” Six months later Chamberlain, with the blessing of the Domin- ions, including Canada, signed fhe Munich agreement, and de- clared it was to be ‘peace for pur time.’ Right on into the summer of 1939 Mackenzie King and his fol- lowers were continuing their talk about war in Europe as ‘sheer madness’. | And all this time the Commit- ‘tee for Emergency Legislation was working on the Defense of \Canada Regulations in prepara- tion for war. | Wet we are told that this war was forced upon us, we weren't ready for it, but there was noth- ing we could do about it but get into it as quick as possible @ EPORTING these facts in the Globe and Mail, of all papers, Columnist Judith Robin- son, who reprinted information given by Stanley Thompson in the New York Post, remarked that “in the place where war could enable a government to en- croach more swiftly and com- pletely upon the freedom of the citizens, the Liberal government at Ottawa began to prepare its Wartime encroachments eighteen months ahead of time.” “Away back in March, 1938,” She declared, “eighteen months ahead of time, the prime minis- ter of Canada felt war coming on and started getting his wartime regulations ready to put ordinary eitizens in jail for echoing in September prime ministerial re- marks of July.” Im the same article, she quoted remarks of New York Post re- porter Stanley Thompson on the Regulations: “You learn that many of the rights, privileges, and protec- tions of democracy have been abolished because the govern- ment believes that is the best way to handle things at home while the nation is helping to defend democracy. in Hjurope. “I do not mean to say that Canada is Hitlerized. The of- ficial regulations certainly are proach to the consideration of this problem as the govern- ment of Canada.” e HIS declaration implied that there would be no Canadian expeditionary force sent overseas until proposals were submitted to the Ganadian people, to parlia- ment. For the last session of parliament gave the government no mandate to send thousands of Ganadians overseas. No money was voted for such a purposs. This is the road that leads to conscription, to an enormous in- crease in the national debt, to new and heavier taxes on the people. That is the unchallenge- able conclusion to King’s war pol- icies. It is what Canada can look forward to. Some innocents might reply: “But King has promised that his government will not introduce conscription, so all is well on that score.’ To those we can say: Re- | THE DUPLICITY OF \PRIME MINISTER KING By Kay Gregory , All APPEAL to my fellow Canadians to unite in a national | effort to save from destruction all that makes life worth fine and to preserve for future generations those liberties ad institutions which others have bequeathed us.” theoretically as oppressive as -any that could be thought up by any dictator—are, in fact, considerably more oppressive and take away considerably more of the citizens’ rights than those in England. But enforcement is erratic — some- times mild, sometimes stern and sometimes, it seems to me, just plain crazy.” When a hundred copies of the Wew York Post were ‘detained’ early this month by the Customs authorities, the same Judith Rob- at the time these papers were being held up, British Ambassa- dor to the United States, Lord inson ironically pointed out that Lothian, was saying in Chicago that “every true democracy wants to hear all sides of every great -question, whether it is domestic or whether it is international . . the free peoples are entitled to speak to one another.” Released later from customs, the detained papers contained, not, as alleged, an article which ‘ibelled Canadian troops in a scurrilous way, but according to Miss Robinson, “a frank and un- flattering survey of Canada’s war activities, governmental and oth- erwise, to date.’ Remarking that she for one ‘cannot sufficiently deplore, sec- tions 21, 39 and 39a of the Regu- Jations, Miss Robinson declared that this incident would ‘‘stand as another evidence of the evil of Mr. King’s defense of regula- tions.” Thus, under the Defense of Canada Regulations, the govern- ment has shown its willingness and eagerness to prevent the peo- ple’s right to criticise govern- ment conduct, that right which has always been the cornerstone of democracy. C) {* CANADA, 3,000 miles away from the western front, war- time regulations are far harsher than those in Britain, within easy reach of German bombers. This clamping down of liberties and civil rights under cover of war- time necessity was made even more severe and arbitrary by the amendments of January 11. Wide public criticism and dis- cussion in Britain has forced many amendments to stringent war-time measures. Professor A. Barriedale, not- ed British constitutional au- thority, criticising some of the British government’s measures, declared that “there is no ex- cuse for depriving us of criti- cism of its action in other fields (than defense issues) and how- ever wrong we may consider pacifism, freedom to express such views should not he de- nied.”” Protest is just as widespread in Canada against imprisonment and persecution of Canadian citi- zens for daring to criticise gov- ernment policy of entry into a war, for which Mackenzie King, as well as Chamberlain and Dal- adier, had patently been prepar- ing years before. It will be well in the coming election for the people of Canada to interpret the Prime Minister’s words for themselves and take it upon their own re- sponsibility “to preserve for fu- ture generations those liberties and institutions which others have bequeathed us,’ to go fur- ther and bequeath even greater liberty for our children and their children’s children in a socialist Canada. Gms read his Sept. 8 pledge to consult the people before he sent an army overseas, and remember that the prime minister’s politic- al career is plentifully studded with broken promises. And re- member: In 1914-15-16 the Borden government repeatedly declared against conscription and plotted the infamous 1917 elections to put ‘over conscription and Union gov- ernment. Premier King spoke as he did on Sept. 8 because he knew that the Ganadian people were not in favor of an expeditionary force. He knew that he had to face the Quebec provincial elections and jt would guarantee defeat for his forces if he came out in favor of sending Canadians overseas. He could not risk having Que- bee repudiate his government and therefore the demagogic promise to submit further pro-- posals to the people, the using of Sir Henry Gullett’s declaration, and the hollow promise of no conscription by his administra- tion. That was bait for the Que- bee voters, eyewash to flim-flam the Canadian people. What would have happened to the King-Lapointe forces in Que- bec if the people had been told that Canadian troops would be in Aldershot by Christmas can be judged by. the fact that 48 percent of the Quebee voters cast their ballots against the Liberal candi- dates, Se S USUAL the capitalist politi- cians share out the roles and it is not surprising that billion- aire R. B. Bennett made a special trip back to Canada from his Juniper Castle to make speeches in favor of conscription. The ‘iron heel’ political has-been can at least do the pob of trying to make it a public issue. Senator Griesbach and other superannu- ated brass-hats take up the chor- us, Prime Minister King and the big money men of St. James and Bay streets know full well that it will not be an easy job to push forward their imperialist war pol- icies. 1940 is not 1914, nor even i9i7 — and they remember the stormy struggle against conscrip- tion not only in Quebec but throughout the country. They are keenly aware that the ADPROACH TO CONSCRIPTION . 4 7ITHOUT consulting the Canadian people the King government has despatched the first two contingents overseas. Just a ll few days ago Premier King was asked: “When will the third contingent sail?” and he intimated that the current session “parliament, will probably consider the matter. { It is certain that many MP’s will be compelled to oppose the government's policies at the session. In particular Premier King a expect trouble from the Quebec members—for his expediti onary force policy spells conscription. overwhelming ‘majority of the Ganadian people are suspicious of this war and bitterly opposed to conscription, the squandering of $100,000,000 a day on the war, the back-breaking taxes imposed and the fascist-like offensive be- ing conducted against free speech, press and association which is deliberately designed to strangle all criticism of the goy- ernment’s war policies. For the Canadian people are grasping the truths regarding this war and are gathering their forces to struggle. On all fronts, the movement against high prices and profiteering, the fight for the retention of civil liberties and the right to criticism—the Canadian imperialists and their apologists face rising storms. And it may well turn out that as in 1916-17, the conscription is- sue will prove to be that issue around which the mightiest mass movement of all will develop and grow strong as the fighting ex- pression of the Canadian people. e STRONG anti-conscription movement already exists in Quebec. The social-patriot lead- ers of the CCF, in spite of their official support of King’s war policies, feel compelled to moutn warnings against the danger of conscription. Their stupid brom- ide — ‘conscription of men and wealth’ is of inestimable help to the war mongers, not a slogan of struggle against war. King himself, and the Liberal administration are nervous about the masses of the voters and.the general public, knowing full well that ithey oppose conscription, and that this government, and perhaps the one that big business may replace it with. can be wrecked on the conscription is- sue. Yes, there is tremendous political dynamite in the con- Scription issue. It is the task of the labor move- Ment to spread these truths far and wide, to explain the impli- cations of the conscription issue to the widest masses. These are the preliminary steps to suaran- tee that the most powerful united front of the Canadian people against conscription, and the rest of the imperialist policies, will be built from below — in the fac- tories, the trade unions, the youth Movement ,in every province. PAUL BUNYAN WITH THE FINNISH ARMY By Harrison George INS eee Christian charity nor human credulity can stand up under the barrage of tall tales by correspondents “with the Finnish army.” These boys “count that day lost whose low descending sun” sees no “Russian army’ licked, or frozen on the run. “Two more Russian divisions,” we were told recently, “are being cut off in the same sectors where the i163rd and 44th Divisions were destroyed recently.” We wondered where those new divisions had com from, said to be the ‘crack troops’ thrown in to ‘retrieve Stalin’s prestige’ For had not these correspondents been telling us for two weeks that ‘ski troops had cut the Len- ingrad Murmansk railroad,’ the only line whereby troops and sup- plies could reach the northeru front? That was a mystery: But then it suddenly dawned on us what had happened. There had been a brief period of warm weather. And, believe it or not, those ‘frozen Russian armies’ we had been told about, must have been thawed out and begun ad- vaneing! Just like Robert W. Service’s sour-dough Alaskan, Sam McGee! OU can’t beat the correspon- dents ‘with the Finnish army.’ And the prize guy on frozen Rus- Sians is James Aldridge of the Worth American Newspaper Al- liance. Aldridge has introducea a new method, like that of ‘Birds- eye’ brand of ‘instantly frozen foods,’ for preserving Russians. A couple of weeks back this in- genious writer got off a honey. And one that the idotic ‘liberals’ of the New Republic swallowed and then regurgitated for its readers, with duly horrified com- ment. “An engagement had just taken place,” it says, when Aldridge ap- peared on the scene. The Rus- Sians, of course, had all been killed, and it was 30 below zero. Then the story goes on to say: “The soldiers froze instantly in the positions in which they died. Somewere locked together, their bayonets within each other’s bod- jes.” (This is slightly embarrass- ing, for unless we figure that the Russians were bayonetting eacn other, there must have been a dead Finn among these frozen statues, and that wouldn’t do. Also we're told “the Russians walked into a trap” and bayonet- ting is not ambush fighting.) “Some,” believe it or not, “were frozen in half-standing positions; some crouching with their arms crooked, holding the hand egre- nades they were throwing. There were cavalry horses frozen under a tree where they had been left. A machine gun battalion (this guy freezes people by battalions!) stopped with the gun parts in their hands as they assembled their weapons. “Their fear was registered on the frozen faces. Their bodies like statues of men, but their faces recorded something be- tween bewilderment and horror.” O WONDER! For it would bewilder anyone but an edi- tor of the New Republic, who is chronically afflicted with stupid- ity enough to believe such a cock- and-bull story of men and horses frozen standing up, and ‘frozen instantly.’ We used to tell one ourselves, up Montant way, of a mule that got caught by a cold snap while licking, and was unable to get its foot down for four days. But we never could qualify as an American correspondent with the Finnish army. Yet we advise anyone who is goofy enough to believe Aldridge, to call any doc- tor with experience and find out for himself that freezing instant- ly, and remaining standing in positions of action ‘like statues’ is just plain buncombe. It isn’t done and never happens that way. The foreign editor of the Van- couver Province is very fond of Aldridge’s hokum. Recently the Province carried one of his fairy tales in which he told of meeting Finnish troops returning from battle—“their faces black with gunpowder.” Ask any veteran who has been in real battle whe- ther it is possible to get your face “black with gunpowder” without getting killed by the other guy shooting you in the face at gun muzzle range. Judges, 15;15, says of Samson: “And he found a new jawbone of an ass, and put forth his hand, and slew a thousand men there- with.” Canadian and American news- (Papers, with a more numerous supply of asses, are doing still better, SHORT JABS by OF Bill i Engels wrote once that at every change in rev- Leaving The Ane tactics, the movement finds itself Train. losing a number of people who cannot go any further, but the movement is well rid of them, Particularly since 1917, the labor movement has been cursed with the good intentions of bour- beois intellectual patrons; not men of the calibre of Marx, Engels and Lenin who became part of the fibre of the working class and took part in its meanest tasks, but patronizers who made it their business to show us how to run our business. Lenin well-called them ‘fellow- travellers.’ Since the signing of the Soviet-Nazi non-aggression pact and the move of the Red army to clean out the fascist menace in Finland, sey- eral of them have gone back to their intellectual stew, to their legitimate job, so well described by Gorky in his letter ‘To American Intellectuals.’ Gorky writes: “The funetion of the intellectual has always been con- fined, in the main, to embellishing the bored existence of the bourgeois, to consoling the rich in the trivial troubles of their lives. The intelli- gentsia was the nurse of the capitalist class. It was kept busy embroid- ering white stitches on the philosophical and ecclesiastical vestments of the bourgeoisie—that old and filthy fabric, besmeared so thickly with the blood of the toiling masses.” The latest of the fellow travellers to emulate the dog in the Bible story is Ralph Bates. Writing where his liberalism warrants him doing it, in the pages of the New Republic, he makes a scurrilous attack on the Soviet Union and the Communist party. He has not the faintest idea of what is behind the situation in Finland any more than any other liberal and proves that he had never any right to call himself a Com- munist. He finishes by saying, “I am getting off the train.” That is a bad simile for him, because trains have a habit of going on to their destina- tion, no matter who gets off at way points. This train is certainly going on without Ralph Bates and his kind, and will reach its destination sooner and without mishap, more certainly, because of the lessened Joad since these intellectual ‘giants’ have dropped off, or been thrown off. Besides, Bates and the other fellow travellers were never actually on the train. They were only on the brake rods and the eat es ¢ “ @ne of my WHinnish friends, of whom ave Greetings, > Quite a number, told me a good story a few Butcher Boys! days ago. Butcher Mannerheim, the idol of the Wews-Herald’s editorial writers, is a Swedish aristocrat and does not speak very much or very good Finnish. He apparently does not know that, if at the end of a day’s work in the slaughterhouse, a Finnish farmer or butcher should tell his friends or helpers, “we've done a good day’s butchering today,” the Finnish word he uses for ‘butchering’ will be ‘lahti’ When, in 1918, Mannerheim had smothered the Finnish democratic republic in the blood of the Finnish democrats, he made a tour of a part of Finland. One place he visited was named ‘Lahti.’ Some of his hired, White Guard, butcher followers who lived there were paraded in the village square for their butcher leader to pass them in military review. When the ceremony took place, Mannerheim saluted them with the words, “Greetings, Lahti boys,” which any good Finn will tell you means, “Greetings, butcher boys.” — There is no double meaning, however, to the statement Mannerheim issued in 1918, a few days after the British government officially recog- nized his government, which had been placed in power by German bayonets while Britain was still fighting Germany in Planders and Erance. That statement reads: “The Germans’ victorious and mighty army landed in Finland to help against the infamous Bolsheviks, and to help the friendship the Finnish people have always had for the noble Kaiser and mighty German people. ..I greet the brave German troops and hope that every Finn will realize the great sacrifice of the noble German people who are helping them in an hour when every man is needed on the Western front.” Will some patriotic ink-slinger who wants to erect a monument to ‘Mannerheim the Magnificent’ please tell me, just precisely why was “every man... needed on the Western front?” In Spite The tales of the press writers and the White : Finnish war office about the exploits of the Of War. White Finn Paul Bunyans are proved false by other news items which have no connection with the war: In December, we were told that the troops of the Swede-Finn gen- eral Wallenius had penetrated Soviet territory beyond Kandalaksha in the Kola Peninsula. (Not knowing any better, the news broadcasters here called this place Kandalaska). We were also told at the same time that brave and patriotic ski detachments, suicide clubs, had cut the Murmansk railroad at various places between Lake Ladoga and the Kola Peninsula. Well, here is a news item, which, without dealing with the war at all, gives the lie to these brazen fabrications. A press release from Moscow, dated Jan. 3, informs us that a session on mining and chemis- try of the Kola Academy of Science was opened on the day previous, Jan. 2, at Kirovsk, on the tenth anniversary of the foundinse of that young town. Academicians, professors and scientific Workers from Moscow, Len- ingrad, and other cities of the Soviet Union, arrived to participate in the discussions on the most important questions connected with mastering the natural resources of the Kola Peninsula. The most interesting discussion at that first day’s session was opened by a woman geologist, Olga VYorobyeva, on the natural resources of one part of the Peninsula, the Lovozero Tundra. Vorobyeva was amongst the first geologists to discover apatite in the Kola Peninsula, a discovery which has enabled the Soviet Union to produce thousands of times more phosphate fertilizers than were produced in Tsarist Russia. During the past four years she has located another mineral sub- stance in vast quantities, loparite, containing titanium, tantalum, niobate and other rare earths. These deposits of rare metals are of world signi- ficance and of extremely great importance to the national economy of the Soviet Union. Away in that northern outpost of civilization, many miles closer to the Pole than any town on the American continent, Kirovysk has a popu- lation of 32,500; Monchegorsk, 18,500 and Murmansk, 106,000. Kirovsk, the most southerly of the three is 100 kilometers (60 mlies) beyond the territories reported to be occupied by the Swede-Finn brigand, Wallenius and the visiting scientists had to travel over the Murmansk railroad— reported to be destroyed in several places by the Finn ski jumpers— or was it by the beer-swilling correspondents in Helsinki? No “We can’t possibly pay this heavy tax, we've z ‘ 1 nothing to pay it with.’ No, that is not my old Plebiscite! side-kicker, Jack, with whom I have chummed it for about 35 years, and who is now too blind ito pack mud up a ladder for a plasterer or to punch boiler tubes. No, it is the manager of the Lion’s Gate Bridge company speaking. Now that the jerrying, the shouting and the ballyhooing is over, the Bridge company says it has no money to pay taxes because the revenue for the year will fall short of the sum needed to pay bond interest and Maintenance by about $100,000. So the obsequious Ald. George Miller, friend of Big Finance, rushes in with a proposal for a plebiscite for a charter amendment to enable it to escape paying its legitimate taxes and is supported by other aldermen. Nobody suggested a charter amendment to enable my old tillicum Jack to get out of paying his taxes when he ‘couldn't possibly pay, so he lost his home. Why should the foreign bondholders of the Bridge company receive any more consideration? PUBLIC MEETING Sunday, Jan. 23, at 3 p.m. ORANGE HALL Gore at Hastings “THE FEDERAL ELECTION” — Speaker: MALCOLM BRUCE Chairman: W. BENNETT Silver Collection