Page Six

The People’s Advocate

Published Weekly by
THE PROLETARIAN PUBLISHING ASSOCIATION
Room 10, 163 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, B.C.
Telephone: Trinity 2019

One Year

Three Months 50

Half Year
Single Gopy. = —

Make All Checks Payable to the PEOPLE'S ADVOCATE

Send All Copy

and Manuscript to the Chawman of the Edttortal Board,

Send all Monies and Letters Pertaining to Advertising and Circulation to the
Business Manager.

Vancouver, B.C., Friday, April 23, 1937

Hepburn, Tool of Reaction

ANTING against “foreign agitators,” Mitchell Hepburn,
premier of Ontario, has openly ranged himself on the side
of the foreign, Morgan-controlled General Motors Corporation
against the Canadian workers in the strike at the Oshawa plant of

the giant American company.

The affiliation of the local union of the Oshawa workers to the
C.1.0., with headquarters in the United States, is the excuse
given for his action by the contemptible little demagogue who in
true fascist style tries to inflame national prejudices against the
strikers. In the same breath he declares that the A.F.LL. (also
with headquarters in the U.S.) is aeceptable to him—and to
General Motors, for which he speaks.

But that is because the A.F.L. is not in the picture, having
refused to make any attempt to organize the worlkers in the auto-

motive industry except feeble attempts to draw the more slulled
ones into craft unions, an impossible task even if attempted seri-
ously and energetically, because the craft union is obsolete insofar
as mass production industries are concerned.

Tn the struggle at Oshawa over union recognition and collec
because of the position he holds, is the

tive bargaining, Hepburn,

chosen mouthpiece and agent of reaction.
workers who organize into umions of their own fashioning or
choosing and to prevent collective bargaining.

The Oshawa workers will not permit the mouthy political
G.M.-Tory reactionary to dictate to them as to what union they
shall-belong to; and in their stand for
must have support of all organized labor
Labor Council (A.F.L.) of Tor

supporting them. For
A.E.L., and would be
the splitters, Green and
which are affiliated to it.

The Doukhobor Problem

NCE more the Doukhobor problem is agitating the public

and there is the usual secrecy on the part of the government.

Peter Veregin meets Pattullo, and neither
Veregin’s statement that his life is in danger,

About all that the people of the province know is that s¢hool
buildings have been blown up or
these outbursts of destructive activity are not made known. No
sane person will endorse terrorism as a means of redressing eriey-
ances while at the same time desiring to have them exposed and

removed.

There is no doubt that the Doukhobor immigrants were de-
eeived when induced to emigrate from their native land and ill-
treated ever since their arrival to the present day. First of all,
they were given a guarantee of exemption from military service
jn Canada, yet when conseription was in force every form of pres-
sure outside of physical force was exerted to hound
religious and pacifist convictions, and in viola-

army against their

tion in spirit of the agreement entered into

ernment with them.
This violation of the

stroyed—taught them.

What is required is to break the ties which bind the exploiting
Doukhobor hierarchy with the capitalist provincial and federal
an impartial public imyestigation 1s
needed, not the sitting-on-the-lid policy of the Pattullo government
in connection with the Hedley Mines scandal.

governments. In any case

onto and many A.F.L. unions are
after all, the C.1.O.
in it today as its most powerful section it
Company, had not suspended the unions

agreement still goes on through muli-
taristic propaganda in textbooks in use in the schools.

Moreover, there is the extreme exploitation of the Doukhobors
by the retention of elements of feudalism. L ;
these exploited and betrayed people strike out in the manner
which tzarism and the 1ld Russian capitalism—now happily de-

His job is to outlaw

this inalienable right they
just as the Trades and

is not dual to the

will talk except for

burned; but all the causes ot

them into the

by the federal goy-

Against all of this

—

In Trotsky’ s Footsteps

Following up their despicable anti-
pnity and other disruptive work
within the CCE, the Vancouver
Trotskyists have sent a mimeo-
graphed letter to CGF clubs, which
in sneering language and burlesque
denunciation of Trotskyism, calls
mockingly for the re-instatement of
A. M. Stephen by the provincial
executive of the CCF ang for unity.

The signature to the malicious
screed is ‘Malcolm Ewen,” a for-
gery compounded of the first name
of the chairman and the surname of
the secretary of the Communist
Party of BC, Malcolm Bruce and
‘Tom Ewen, respectively. This
mythical person is represented as
secretary (pro tem) of an equally
mythical “People’s Progressive
Party.””

The purpose of the letter is ob-
yious. By linking up Stephen (and
those in the CCF who support his
reinstatement and strive for unity)
with the Communist Party, a Peo-
ple’s Progressive Party (which
doesn’t exist) and anti-Trotskyism,
the authors of the letter hope to
make people believe that a new
party has been created as a rival
to the CCE.

The address given as the place
from which the document came is
¢hat of a small Chinese laundry on
West Pender street.

This work of the Vancouver let-
ter of Trotskyists, as clumsy as it is
contemptible and cowardly, is about
what one can expect from followers
of the murderous traitor who col-
Jaborated with Hitler to destroy so-
cialism and restore capitalism in
the Soviet Union and to parcel out

© the
Japanese militarism

fatherland to Hitler,
and Trotsky
and his fellow conspirators.

workers’

This is the same gang which,-at
the meeting in the Auditorium at
which the Spanish delezation spoke,
distributed a scurrilous leaflet slan-
dering the heroic opponents of
Franco, Hitler and Mussolini. And
the same gang can be expected to
cantinue their nefarious work as
lone as labor organizations tolerate
them.

The provincial executive of the
CCE have been warned over and
over again of the activities of these
counter - revolutionary degenerates.
Way, more, they have had specific
cases brought before them, such as
the case of Ferguson, who admitted
he distributed the Trotskyist leaf-
leis at the Spanish delegation meet-.
ine: Yet he was not suspended
from the CCF, while Stephen, a sup-
porter of the Spanish peaple against
fascism, is suspended.

It is nothing less than a disgrace
that the CCE is permitted to be
made a refuge for such an organized
band of disrupters and enemies of
unity and progress. The latest
manifestation of their activity, the
forged letter, is another warning to
the CCF. It was conceived and de-
Signed as a provocation to lead to
further expulsions of all those who
exercise their democratic rights to

| the

PEOPLE ’?S

ADVOCATE

An Open Letter to
J. 5. Woodsworth

a |
~

4

Dear Mr. Woodsworth:

My attention has been drawn to
an article written by yourself en-
titled “The Canadian
Front.’ This article is obviously
on the question of unity and the
people’s front movement in general
and, as such, it calls aloud for cor-
rection.

Perhaps the most glaring example
of this need is the ertrayagant last
paragraph but one. ‘here you in-
Sinuate that the main interest of
the Communist Party in elections is
to defeat CCF candidates and you
use the following words in connec-
tion with fhe Hamilton by-election:

“Why should they, in the pres-
ent by-election in Hamilton, in a
riding where there are very few
Communists and where the preju-
dices are strong against Commun-
ists, send Tim Buck to say that
the Communists would support
Jacl. O’Hanley, the CCF candidate,
thus playing right mto the hands
of our political opponents? The
Conservatives got 8107 votes, the
Liberals 7291, and the CCE, with
the ‘aid’ of Tim Buck, 3536.”

Mr. Woodsworth, this statement
is unworthy of you. You insinuate
here that I deliberately went into
Hamilton to injure the chances of
your candidate and you leave un-
stated the facts which show clear-
Iy that such was not the case. Let
me remind you of them. I spoke in
Hamilton on February 19th. The
by-election did not take place until
March 22, more than a month after-
ward. Your campaign had not even
started.

The meeting at which I spoke had
been arranged during January, be-
fore the date of the by-election was
announced. My address did not
deal with the Hamilton by-election
or with Mr. O’'Hanley’s candidature.
In an address to 2000 workers, which
Jasted an hour and a half, I referred
to the forthcoming by-election only
onee: in a three-minute appeal for

united front effort behind the CCF
candidate.

Pertinent Facts
Were Omitted

It is clear, therefore, that you are
misrepresenting the case when you
insinuate that my speech was aimed
at injuring the chances of Mr.
O’ Hanley. It is necessary, how-
ever, to remind you of a still more
pertinent omission of fact in your
statement. You know that Alder-
man Stewart Smith was scheduled
to address a public meeting in Ham-
ilton during the final week of the
campaign and that Mr. Garland ap-
roached our local comrades at the
eleventh hour to canced it. The hall
had been rented for more than a
week, advertising was out and a
radio broadcast had been arranged.

Tf our motives had been as you
suggest, this would have been our
golden opportunity.

What was the response of the
Communists of Hamilton to Mr.
Garland’s proposal? You know, Mr.
Woodsworth, that they immediate-
ly cancelled all arrangements. A1-
derman Smith was advised not to

proceed to Hamilton and Mr. Gar-
land's fear was allayed. Why did
you canceal these facts? Why did
you write that misrepresentative in-
sinuation with the suggestive quota-
tion marks? Surely you are not go-
ing to adopt methods which you
have hitherto refused to accept re-
sponsibility for when they are used
by other spokesmen of your party?
“A little tolerance.” indeed!

But for the fact that the deadly
seriousness of the situation forbids
levity, one would be tempted to
smile at your somewhat lugubrious
explanation for the poor showing
made in the federal elections. To
dismiss thetremendous surge of the
masses away from the Liberal and
Conservative parties; as you do,
with the remark that “the CCI ran
into hard luck,’’ is, to say the least,

like trying to describe the deep-
2zoing crises which mark the dis-
integration of declining capitalism

in the terms of a dice game.

What Unity Could
Have Achieved

A united front agreement such as
the Communist Party proposed to
the CCF during the last federal elec-
tion campaign would have changed
the whole situation. We may hold
different opinions as to whether we
could hawe attracted more or less
people from the Stevens’ camp or
Social Credit movement during
the actual election campaign, but
nobody can question the statement
that our joint movement would have
been in a tremendously stronger
position to organize the disillusion-
ed voters after the elections were
OVEer:

Rerrettable as it may be, one
compelled to note the fact that your
opposition to united action flows
mainly from a narrow, rigid concep-
tion of parliamentary, electioneer-
ing, organization. One of the out-
Standing examples of this is to be
seen in your petulant reiteration of
the complaint against my candida-
ture in North Winnipee and that
of Malcolm Bruce in Bast Vancou-
ver. :

Anybody who did not know that
the Communist Party has been. or-
ganized on a Dominion-wide scale in
Canada since before you were elect-
ed to the Dominion House in 1921,
would imagine, by the way you
refer to these things, that our party
was organized the year before last.

is

advocate changes in policy within
the CCF; and to make it appear as
if the Communist Party, indi- |
vidual Communists, are organizing
a party in opposition to the CCIt.—
M.B.

or

If you insist upon preventing any
measure of unity or even temporary
united front electoral agreements
between the CCE and the Commun-
is tParty, then at least be consis-
tent. Wace the fact that the Com-

People’s

an official statement from yourself

ae

— |

munist Party, which, incidentally,
has more active, regularly dues-
paying members than the CCF, has
a perfect right to run its candidates
in those constituencies which prom-
ise the most support to our party
and the policies that our candidates
advocate. :

Time To Study
Problems Objectively

Tt is time that the Socialists of
Canada were given an opportunity
to consider the problems confront-
ing our movement in a more dsi-
passionate manner than you seem
willing to permit. Even if we leave
aside the world-shaking develop-
ments in Burope and deal only
With the immediate problems con-
fronting the Jabor movement in
Canada, the conviction is irresistible
that the Canadian labor movement
must have a measure of unity or it
will not be able. to utilize the oppor-
tunities with which it is confronted.

It should not be necessary for me
to remind you of the terrific price
that the working people will have to
pay for failure; the tragic warnings
of Germany and Vienna are still all
too fresh. It is necessary, however,
to point out to you that the re-
eent developments in Quebee show
quite clearly that the forees of re-
action are striving steadily to de-
velop their own Canadian forms of
Fascism. Your own speech upon the
subject in the House of Commons
shows that, in Quebec, the Tascist
trend is already at an advanced
Stage.

Surely you are not going to sug-
gest that it was called into being
by “militant action’’ On the con-
trary, you must: realize by now that
only the widening and strenethen-
ing of the working-class and progres-

sive front can stop its further
spread. :
You yourself have changed your

attitude tremendously in this con-
nection during the past year. The
cablegram from your National Coun-
eil to Dr. Bethune, the activity of
the CCF in defence of the strikers
at the Holmes Foundry in Sarnia,
the fact that the CCE has identi-
fied itself with the Oshawa strike,
are all Significant signs that the
CCF is turning more definitely to-
ward those forms of activity which
you and other leading CC@E’ers used
to condemn. EI welcome this. I
welcome it in the name of the Com-
munist Party and on behalf of all
redical workers.

We are prepared to go the limit
to make these activities successful
and to repeat, in every field of ac-
tivity, those things which we have
done to make our joint activity in
defence of Spanish democracy such
an outstanding triumph of working-
class effort. We cannot achieve
suecess, however, if you, as the
leader of the G@EF, are going to re-
sort to weapons which are worthy
only of contempt

Mr. Woodsworth
And Trotskyism

In this connection, I want to reg-
ister a warm protest against the
calculated injection of Trotslyism
into your article on the People’s
Front. You cannot be ignorant of
the political character of the Trot-
skyist movement, in Canada as well
as throughout the world today, and
yet you say:

“Tf the Communists are so keen
for a united front, why not begin
by having a united front of* the
Stalinites and the Trotskyites?”

Mr. Woodsworth, you know that
more than 300 Ganadian boys are
fichting in defence of democracy in
Spain. Letters home show that in
their ranks there are members of
the CCE and members of the CCYM.
standing shoulder to shoulder with
members of the Communist Party,
offering their lives as the supreme
sacrifice for that which we all hold
dear.

You must know that one of the
Worst enemies they have to meet
during: this war is the enemy behind
their lines, composed of the dregs
which have been cast off by the
healthy revolutionary members of
the Anarchist movement: who have
become soldiers of the Republic, and
the counter-revolutionary Trotsky-
ists who have joined forces with
these dregs in an effort to gire
eounter-revolutionary help to Fran-
ca’s “5th Golumn*: in the work of
disrupting and, if possible, demor
alizing the heroic defence of the
Spanish people.

The CCE has no more in common
with the counter-revolutionary ac-
tivities of the Trotskyists than we
have. The rank and file members
of the CCE are members of the CCE
because they want Socialism. MThev
art proving, day by day, that they
realize the correctness of our con-
tention that the struggle to organize
our forces for Socialism involves the
struggle to organize our unions, our
unemployed movements, our popular
demonstrations and electoral activi-
ties—all our forees for defence and
for gains today.

BC Provincial

Election

To dismiss all these tasks and the
problems they raise in the airy way
that you do in your article does not
do justice to the needs and the in-
terests of the Labor Movement.

British Columbia faces an election
on the first of June and the results
will depend mainly upon whether
or not those people who want toa
defeat the reactionary big interests
are united. There are enough of
them so that if they go into the
elections as a united bloc. British
Columbia will probably have a CCF
government after June ist.
Qn the other hand, let there be

no illusions, the big interests will

April

23, 19383

Make No ae ee or the
= lish Liberal press-
Mistake and a large Soetos of
the Labor press also, to the stand of
the British Government on the
Spanish question is not only a mis-
ta’xen but a dangerous one. To
write that the British lion’s claws
-| are becoming blunted and that any
butchering gangster like Franco -
ean twist his tail with impunity, is
to show an utter lack of under-
standing of the studied policies of
the gang of Tory fire-eaters and
sword-rattlers, ex-Liberal turncoats
and renegade self-styled socialists
that constitute the National Gov- _
ernment.
The most powerful battleship in
the world does not refrain from
sinking the fascists pirate ships be—
cause the British lion in his old age
has become cowardly, but because
the baby-killer Franco is an ally in
their plans to keep Reaction in the
saddle in Europe.
Qn every occasion in which the
forces of law and order in Spain in-
flict a crushing defeat on the
friends of Baldwin, Hitler and Mus—
solini, the British Government be-
comes ‘perturbed.’ This is per—
fectly in accord with the judgment
of Marx, ninety-three years ago-
Replying to Ruge, in the Franco-

Thirsty? Moscow’s ultraamodern breweries manufacture real beer.

“German Annals, he refers to “Eng-
Jand, where perplexity has been ele-

H. Gargrave

Corrects Us

The People’s Advocate received a
letter from H. Gargrave, provincial
secretary of the CCF, protesting
against a news iteni which appear-
ed in our paper of April 16, headed
“Hy Gargrayve Quits Meet.”

The letter is a long one, and very

abusive. We are charged with “de-
liberately distorting stories pertain-

ing to working-class interests,” “dis-
erediting CCE executive members,”
and he does “not expect any redress
in this matter.”

We do not at this time print Gar-
erave’s letter in full, for we have
no desire to discredit him. Bui that
part of his letter which corrects the
news story we are pleased to print.

The only paragraph in The Peo-
ple’s Advocate story that he corrects
runs as follows:

“Garerave held that a two-third
majority was required when his
motion was defeated, but was un-
able to convince the majority of
the delegates.”

The correction made in his letter
is as follows:

“Jn accordance with the instruc-
tions from my club, I moved to
rescind a motion carried by the
District Council at their previous
meeting. Considerable discussion
arose at which time if was point-
ed out that the Norquay Club,
from whose delegates the original
motion emanated, did not endorse
this resolution. Despite this fact,
the two delegates from this club
voted against the motion to re-
scind. Upon the motion being put
to the floor, on the chairman’s
count, the vote was fourteen for
—ten against. The chairman, A.
McGeachey, ruled that it took a
tivo-third majority to rescind this
motion.”

It will be seen from the paragraph
in the news story and Gaysrayve’s
correction, which we gratefully ac-
cept, that the story said that Gar-
erave, not the chairman, raised the
point of a two-third majority béing
required. Surely this was mot sa
serious error, nor one that could be
regarded as a deliberate attempt to
“discredit CCH members.”

However, we are pleased to make
the correction, and assure Comrade
Gargrave that the error was not
made deliberately.

| effort and victory.

strain all their energies to secure
the election of a-government more
favorable to them than the present
one is.

A serious responsibility rests upon
your shoulders. Blectoral unity
ean be achieved in BC ond, if neces-
sary, the united front agreement
upon which it is based can be as
temporary as the election campaign
for which it is arranged. You alone
can utter the decisive word which
will turn the entire anti-capitalist
movement in BC towards united
Tf you refuse to
utter that word, if the position you
Stated in your article remains your
unchangeable attitude towards the
election policy ef the CCE in British
Golumbia, then you will be sending
the GCF forces into action against

all other anti-capitalist. forces: to
divide the vote and
open the victory for

Reaction, -
I hope that you will change your
mind while we still have time to win.
Yours for Socialism,
< TIM BUCK,
General Secretary,
Communist Party of Canada.

yated to a system.” j
This “perplexity” which shows
itself as “perturbation” at the “yic=
tories of democracy, is the product
of several hundred years of hypo-
eritical diplomacy or diplomatic hy—
pocrisy, whichever you will.

We must remember this when we
read their lying statements to ex-
cuse the blockade and starvation
of the people of Bilbao, that they
are “trying to prevent 2 general
European war.”

Liberty-loving people throughout,
the world must not confuse the
idealistic phrase with its realisic
content. That is the end-product
of diplomatic chicanery and deceit
in the mouths of political scoun=
darels and is not a bit different from

Book Review

BULLDERS OF BRITISH co-
LUMBIA—By William (“Old
Bill’ Bennett, 50 Cents.

Here is a book of considerable
historical value that will be an
eagerly sought addition to the
library of any progressive reader.
A hook written by a man whose
name has become a legend among
the working class of this province
and far beyond; who, however one
may differ with him, must be re-
spected for his knowledge both of

Labor’s history in Canada, and e

particularly in British Columbia, any other form Ce See Engels’

and of Socialist theory. “We Are From conception of 2
In “Builders of British Columbia’’| Kronstadt” or art as

Old Bill writes as he speaks—frank
and to the point. Into this work he
has poured a wealth of material. of
information that will be priceless

correct,_that it should depict cehar—
acter in all conditions of life and
that the propaganda should be in
the work itself, — then “We Are

a aus f pede eee . eee From Kronstadt” is a work of art,
See i ie egneee SARE De eres oe triumph
pOo Evers WORSE z ©! to come to Vancouver is another
slightest. interest in the develop-

slice of revolutionary history, 2
companion picture to “Chapayev,
that again draws from the depths
of life while Hollywood still ladles.

ment of this province. :
This is a book about British Co-
lumbia; about the men and women,

the workers who have built the 4 5

: th th. £ the
province. To those hardy pioneers ae eee itis thes epic <
who brought ‘civilization’ to BC = y-

The author, Vishnevsky, was 2
sailor in the Kronstadt naval fore-
es, the director, Dzigan, fought
through the civil war and gradu-
ated from the Soviet Motion Pic-

and, incidentally, made a good thing
out of it, we do not expect this
book to rank as a best seller. But
among progressive people generally

it will undoubtedly | a if :
Sane udeubiedis eave ture Institute, and the Red Navy
The chapter’ dealing with the Parent ae sae 3 See foo
shameful robbery carried on by the picture. Ere Ore eS Tt
CPR. by the Hudson’s Bay com- other than Soviet influence.
pany—"the gentlemen adventurers” impressed ebe Se ee re
who traded into Hudson Bay and] SY? Chapaye enh Be SSE &
anywhere else where “there were for the sailors, maybe:

Already it has made 2 practical
contribution to the struggle against
Reaction. The story is woven
around the defense of Leningrad
in 1919 from one of the Russiab
Francos, Yudenich. When Yuden-
ish’s tanks, supplied by British Im-—
perialism, came rolling on Lenin-
grad, the defenders, soldiers, sail-
ers and workers, had to learn how
to fight them. And they succeeded?!
Recently, when [Franco's tanks,
supplied by Italian Fascism, ad-
vanced on Madrid, the heroic mili-
tiamen learned from this film, how
the Leningrad defenders beat these
destroying monsters. This part of

natural resources to steal—are a
brilliant revelation of a colossal
eraft, a graft that makes MicGeer’s
Lost Lagoon fountain and Hedley
Mines insignificant by comparison.

“Builders of British Columbia”
contains many chapters on the
strugeles of the miners, the street
railwaymen, the loggers and fisher-
men striving for living wages and
decent conditions. The history of
the Nanaimo miners’ strike of 1912
is supplemented by rare pictures of
His Majesty’s forces swinging into
action—a dramatic story of early
strugzles im itself worth the price

of the book. P )
If some chapters dealing with the picture was run Over and over
more recent developments are a again. Battalions of tank-fichters

were organized, and they, too, beat
the tanks.

Tf you want to know how it is
\ | done, see for yourself at the Little
Theatre, beginning on the 30th or
this month. This is a duty you
owe, not only to yourself, but to the
movement. We, you and I, should
constitute ourselves a sure founda-
tion on which the Soviet films cat
bank for support so that their in-
fluence may spread to new and-
hitherto untouched sections of the
people, for to see is to be won and
influenced by them.

When Mussolini's fas-

little dry, the dryness is well com-
pensated by Old Bill’s breezy style.

"They Say.

==

SX
@
ff;
—{

“The unions were created by
Wall Street to bring about the
control of Labor.’—Henry: Ford.

“My place is marching with the
workers rather than riding with
General Motors.’—Ontario Labor

Minister David A. Croll, ousted | Pjeture V u
by Premier Hepburn. t a cist bullies, and the
“Wascim means a war to the PosteardsS cheated workers and

peasants under them, left Italy
they were armed with more than
tanks and guns. They brought with
them also, posteards on which to
send home to Sunny Italy news of
the great fascist victories to be Wor
in the Iberian Peninsula where the
forces of Imperial Rome were de-
feased 2000 years ago-

These postcards are DOW being
sent out of Spain, but they are not
telling of fascist victories. In the
rout of Mussolini’s braves, they ate
falling into the hands of those who

death with the churches because
the ideals of Fascism are in stark
and aggressive conilict with the
ideals of religion.’—Rev. D. de-
Sola Pool, Spanish & Portuguese
synagosue.

“Jn 1917, when producers sot
one dollar for making goods, over-
head people got another dollar for
the various services leading up
to the sale of goods to the con-
sumer. But in 1932, when pro-
ducers got one dollar, overheaders
got $2.30."—Prof. Walter Rauten-

are defending democracy in Spain,

strauch, Columbia University.
>) | and are being sent to France, Brit-

RADIO

BEVERY

BEGINNING APRIL 27th
Over

Hear MALCOLM BRUCE

and GUEST SPEAKERS on the
Communist Party Broadcast

TUESDAY, 7:30-7:45 P.M.

ain, Canada and so forth, by the
heroes of the International Bri-
gade, the men who are proud to
bear the names of Garibaldi, Thael-
mann, Lincoln, and their comrades-
in-arms.

ment forces. It was a view of 2
church in Rome, the “Chiesa della
Trinita dei Monti’ (the Church of
the Trinity of the Mountains). The

Milano and Roma.

CJOR

__)} Mussolini THE posteard!

TI saw one a few days ago from 2
Canadian who is with the Goyern-

publisher's name was A. Sorrochi,

The Garibaldi Battalion will send