AN ACCEPTABLE "IT SAYS HERE THAT WE ARE PART OF LEVEL OF UNEMPLOYMENT!" 25 years ago... CCL HAILS GENEVA TALKS Relaxation of world tensions in the past year is “proof that war is not inevitable and that negotiations are neither useless nor a sign of weakness” declared a draft policy statement of the 400,000-member Canadian Congress of Labor placed before the delegates attending their 15th annual convention in To- ronto. The document also calls for a ban on all A and H- weapons, the destruction of atomic bomb stocks and out- lawing their manufacture. Guest speaker CIO president Walter Reuther said that if great nations and great peoples could out of common fears mobilize for war, surely they could make the same kind of effort fighting for peace and raising living standards. : Tribune, Oct. 17, 1955 Profiteer of the week: 50 years ago... NO MORE SOVIET COAL The die-hard Bennett gov- ernment has carried out its threat against Soviet imports of coal into Canada. Seven boat- loads now on the. high seas will be turned back. This coal is hard coal. Cana- dian hard coal production is a mere fraction of the hard coal need in industry. Most of Cana- da’s hard coal comes from the U.S. and: now the Soviet-hating Bennett gang springs the lying yarn that Soviet imports are threatening U.S. profits and must be banned. Why Canadians should be worried about American profits is hard to imagine. Canadian workers must realize that this “anti-dumping” scare is part of an intensified anti-Soviet attack which is now on an economic footing, but will be soon fought with rifles and poison gas. The Worker, Oct. 18, 1930 nation. . Ever wonder why paper costs have sky- rocketed — including paper for the workers’ press? One $62,824,000 reason is the after-tax profit of Abitibi-Price Inc., for just nine months, up to Sept. 30. Ali the more reason why the Trib needs yo Figures used are from the company's financial statements. ur subscription, renewal or do- Editor — SEAN GRIFFIN Associate Editor — FRED WILSON Business and Circulation Manager — PAT O'CONNOR Published weekly at Suite 101 — 1416 Commercial Drive, Vancouver, B.C. V5L 3X9. Phone 251-1186 . Subscription Rate: Canada $10 one yr.; $6.00 for six months; All other countries, $12 one year. Second class mail registration number 1560 PACIFIC TRIBUNE—OCT. 24, 1980—Page 4 S £5. MAES ED. oD ~ SIDIWORILAIL COMIMIEINT Job creation needed now The federal and provincial govern- ments are hot on making capitalism work, but they don’t care much whether . © workers work. While the unemployment * rate, averaged across Canada, has not dropped below 7% in more than a year, all governments appear to accept that as normal. In fact when the business types discuss it among themselves they agree that 5% to 7% unemployment meets their definition of “full employment”. Even by official figures that was 757,000 “fully employed” people with- out jobs in September. With the “hidden” unemployed the figure is more ‘like a million. While job creation de- pends on the policies of both Ottawa and the provinces, it does not follow that be- cause Alberta has the lowest rate, 3.7% and Newfoundland the highest, 13.4%, that these two Tory regimes have dif- ferent attitudes toward the unemployed. The uncontrolled profiteering of private investors is assisted in every way by the policies of both old-line parties. Young’ workers and older workers threat over them of no job prospects. Al apparent drop in the unemployment rate in September, to 7.4% from 7.7% in August resulted mainly from student having to try to hold onto part time “summer” jobs while returning [ school; and other young workers who — can find nothing better than part time work. The layoffs, shutdowns, and run- aways, to which add lack of learning and training programs, are taking their toll. While many long-time workers are battling for portable pensions in today § insecure conditions, and demanding job creation, not layoffs, and even having fight for severance pay, many young workers simply want a steady job, ofte? their first. The age gap has been known to creat€ differences, but in the labor movement unity around job demands can help turn more heat on governments to come UP with genuine programs for job creation for all workers, not profit creation fot the corporations. — have something in common, namely, the War Measures and labor This month marks the tenth an- niversary of the imposition by the Trudeau government of the infamous War Measures Act, which ushered in intimidation, arrests and imprisonment of hundreds of innocent people on the pretext of their participation in an “apprehended insurrection”. That was on October 16, 1970. Across Canada, the threat bore down on trade unionists, who saw arbitrary arrests sweeping Quebec. The threat hung over strikers, peace activists, labor publica- tions, public meetings, people distribut- ing leaflets or posters. All were liable for jail. : Tribune contributor Alain Patrie wrote how police ransacked his home, and later: “From the police car I could see my family peering out the window through the rain-drenched night. How __ long would the separation be?” Said the late Charles Brooks, then president of Auto Local 444, Windsor: “You can be sure the anti-labor employers ... will begin to charge every union organizer with carrying bombs, being a Bolshevik .. .” Communist Party leader William Kashtan denounced the effort to pit French against English in Canada. “We are the first ‘political party in Canada,” he declared, “which reacted so quickly. Let me tell you, this Act is equally directed against any voice which calls for social change in Canada...” — Only monumental protest turned off the wave of arrests and intimidation. But the War Measures Act is still on the books, waiting, with no guarantee the federal government, or a federal/pro- vincial collusion will not unleash it again. The day after the promulgation of this police state act in 1970, the Com- munist Party, its general secretary, and most of its central executive, including the president of the Communist Party of Quebec, mounted a protest on Parli- ament Hill. And that historical fact gives the lie to those right-wing New Democ rats who, 10 years later, tell us only the NDP opposed the War Measures Act. The NDP, in fact, was. divided. But credit goes to those 16 of the 20 NDP MPs who voted against it; trade unions ‘who rallied; the Canadian Peace Con- gress which spoke out. As the Canadian Army occupied Quebec, armed soldiers ringed parlia- ment and hapless viciiins huddled jails, the War Measures Act contributed nothing to counteracting the juvenile terrorist activities of the FLQ (Front de Libération du Québec), none of whos 35 (!) activists was scooped up in the wholesale arrests. 4 What was this but a try-out of the ability of monopoly government to wipé out civil and human rights at one swoop? They proved they could do it, but not sustain it without going all the way to fascist oppression. One would think the “Liberal” government would now weigh its words. But on this 10-year-old infamy; Trudeau defends his action, repeating the “apprehended insurrection” non- sense. The recently released Duchaine re- port, commissioned by Quebec’s justice department, exposes the fraudulence of such claims: “The crisis served as 4 pretext for large-scale repression . . .” The Communist’ Party, as documented, took an immediate and unyielding stand against that repres- sion, stating both its distain for ter- rorism, and its support of the struggle of French Canada _ for self- determination. Ten years the CPC need not alter a single line of that record. Facts are facts. : But, 10 years later, there is a growing need for increasing labor unity against the vicious anti-labor attacks of the ruling monopolies, with the War Mea- sures Act an ever-present warning. | BF ai a hy