N THREE DAYS ‘of hard-work- ' ing, hard-fighting sessions in border ‘city’s Audi- torium. 900 delegates ‘to this Ontario Federation of Labor con- vention hammered out a strong- er stand on many issues. _ The convention opened on the heels of the defeat of the arro- gant Liberal bid for a majority government and was greatly heartened by the stronger show- ing of the New Democratic Party. Delegates resoundingly re-endorsed the NDP; But they avoided the double pitfall of either “let’s leave all legislative action to the NDP”, or “only an NDP government will improve anything.” ‘The firs? business to hit the floor, the resolution on Ontario’s minimum wage law, demonstra- ted the temper of the gathering. The resolutions committee re- commended repeating the pre- vious stand for a $1.50 legal min- minimum but was obliged to up. it to $1.75 in the face of stron objections from delegates, begin- ning with that of Toronto Iron- workers delegate Jack White. A cry which began here be- came almost the theme of the convention: “No more cap-in- hand!” Begun by Murray Tate of the Toronto Newspaper Guild, it was shouted out time and again by delegates. It signified a demand for mass action to back up labor’s'requests for vital improvements in legislation from the Conservative government of Ontario. Similarly, the convention strengthened the committee’s substitute resolution on strike- breaking injunctions, which was essentially against only ex parte injunctions. The OFL is now committed to fight for the elimi- nation of any court injunctions in labor disputes. The OFL is also committed to a stronger attack against the bastion of the “residual rights of management” and for a strug- gle to strengthen labor’s right to maintain the strike weapon. OFL president Dave Archer, re-elected by acclamation, pin- pointed the special importance of the managément’s rights issue. .The convention passed good resolutions on pensions, medi- care, the war on poverty, the legal 40-hour work week (with overtime work voluntary), amendments to the Labor Rela- tions Act on collective bargain- ing rights for municipal employ- ees, better conciliation services and certification procedures. ‘It devoted more time than in past cenventions to problems such as the need to get contract clauses permitting workers to honor picketlines. Aside from this resolution the strike issue and the fraternal «STEP DOWN, TREMBLY WE ARE” GROUNDING ~You!” Report from Windsor Ontario Federation of Labor convention: progress to the echo of rising militancy By CHARLES WEIR honoring of picketlines of other unions took the limelight a- dozen times in discussion. For example, President Archer accepted the appeal of Gordie Lambert, spokesman for the autoworkers of St. Catharines, to lead a mass demonstration of the delegates to a strike of gas workers in Windsor whose picketing has been hamstrung by a court injunction. : What was potentially a far more divisive resolution on picketlines was kept off the con- vention floor. Submitted by the Oil, Chemical and Atomic Work- ers union, the resolution label-- led four Building Trades unions. who were crossing their picket- line at the Clarkson B-A refinery as strikebreakers. ; The Oilworkers withdrew their resolution in return for a pro- mise of a maximum effort to solve the problem through inter- union negotiation plus a maxi- mum drive by all unions to back the “Boycott B-A Oil” campaign. The friction between the Oil- workers and Building Trades workers stems from the deter- mination of the former to elimi- nate company “contracting out” practices. The Building Trades workers, who benefit from out- contracting, are opposed to this change, even though many would not resort to crossing the picketlines to win their point. Building Trades workers in British Columbia are apparently united in at least their refusal to cross the picketlines. But in Ontario the split is deeper. Gerry Gallagher, Toronto La- borers Local 183, reported that his local had not only honored - Oilworkers’ picketlines, but held work stoppages elsewhere to pressure contractors into dis- continuing purchases of B-A- products. Toronto Laborers Local 506, on the other hand, had insisted that its men cross the Oilworker picketlines. At the OFL convention the caucus of the Building Trades ‘unions removed Laborers Local 506 president Scotty Linnes from the OFL Council as a conse- quence of his local’s stand. The OFL leadership elections brought some surprises. Spokes- men for more militant policies rolled up a surprisingly high vote. Running against incumbent OFL secretary-treasurer D. Ham- ilton, Jack White polled 322 votes (to. Hamilton’s 429). Stymied by the CLC rule that a ballot is valid only if it is marked for the full number to be elected to the council (in this case 12), plus the fact that they were disorganized as compared to the fully-organized adminis- tration slate, a half a dozen in- dependents still made a strong showing. Gordie Lambert rolled up 351 votes, compared to 548 for the last of the administra- tion slate. After a spirited debate on its. proposal to replace annual con- ventions with biennial conven- tions, the administration suffered — ee 7. "WELL, THAT WRAPS UP THIS PEACE: another defeat this year. ‘A sharp battle developed -around the Vietnam issue. Dele- gates. could see the United ‘States by glancing out the audi- torium windows. They could feel ‘that country’s presence inside the hall also. Delegates knew of the recent swing of powerful U.S. unions away .from peace positions and toward support of President Johnson’s escalation of the dirty war in Vietnam. . The _ resolutions brought in a substitute resolu- ‘tion which read: “Whereas the has been escalated by all parties concerned, and whereas this action represents a threat to the peace of the world, and whereas Canada has been able to play a. role on the Peace Commission: “Therefore be it resolved that we urge the Canadian govern- ment to use its good offices to: “ask Great Britain and Russia to reconvene the Geneva Confer- ence with a view to working out a political solution to this crisis; “And be it further resolved that under no _ circumstances should our Canadian troops -be sent to Vietnam.” : While agreeing with the ‘“Re- solved”, speaker after speaker challenged the “whereas” -which bowed some distance toward George Meany and his AFL-CIO executive council. As one dele- “gate said, it placed the blame “equally on the aggressor and the victim.” Delegates told me later that for the first time they began to understand what emerges from ' years of red-baiting and raiding. They saw this clearly in the speech of Tony Soden, the new Steelworkers president at INCO in Sudbury (where the Labor Board has ordered a vote. on Mine Mill’s application for re- certification). Soden took the floor to de- mand all-out support for the United States. He called for “bullets for Reds” and outlined some of his own qualifications to fire such bullets. Later another Sudbury Steel- ‘worker delegate added the call for the U.S. Marines to come in and “clean the Commies out of Sudbury.” The Sudbury Steel union offi- cers got endorsation in an ad- ministration resolution. which appealed (rather hysterically) to INCO workers to stay in Steel. But it is doubtful that many of the OFL delegates found the Steel union spokesmen from Sudbury very comfortable bed- fellows in the House of Labor. Meanwhile, the Vietnam reso- lution passed overwhelmingly on the strength of its constructive “resolveds.” This rejection of the pro-war policy of the USA, and particu- larly of the AFL-CIO’s commit- ment to support of that policy, was the most constructive action to come out of this convention. As the largest provincial seg- ment in the Canadian Labor Congress and as a body which traditionally plays an influential role in shaping CLC policy, the OFL decision could spell the dif- ference between CLC leadership falling in line with the AFL-CIO behind the Pentagon, or sticking to the previously-established Canadian policy of the.CLC for peaceful solutions to all world tensions and trouble spots. committee | Vietnam war November 26, 1965—PACIFIC TRIBUNE—PO® A resolution which called elimination of anti-Comm! clauses in union constitutl was not brought before the vention. It would have ? interesting to see if the OFL® ministration has come up ¥” an answer in the two years * Toronto Steelworkers Stan Thornley challenged "| a previous convention. Z He had urged it to € how the House of Labor justify its claim to being bulwark of democracy” Wi illegalizes a political party cepted as legal by Conserv4 Liberal and even Social governments in Canada. Little time was devoted 10”) problems confronting lab0! ©) the community as a result automation. The comm substitute resolution was It concentrated on_ reétrfal and immediate demands suc higher pay and the shorter wT week. The first delegates to hit floor began to dig into the W implications, such as the ?) for labor, community and 2) ernment participation in CO?) ling automation, even bet '’ nationalization. When the Fi vious question” was calle® unheard delegates were !&" | the mikes. ot The speech delivered by Vice-President William struck a constructive note generated serious thinkiN® ,| the need of a major uni0? | ganizing drive now. FT Dodge cited figures sh0Wy) that the turn had been 7 from recent years when ¥ ism had lost ground. He "%) cooperation between union) stead of demoralizing cM} tion for the same units, in 4 bid to organize the unorg@ white-collar and blue-collat He startled delegates by / ducing figures to show tha tario unions should havé r million members instead of present 500 or 600 thousa®! oi his plea for cooperation 4¥ the question of unions the CLC. This report of the convet ] would be incomplete will recognition of the emerge?” a powerful, clear-thinking, ing body of relatively yong union spokesmen at thé level. It includes young me? Jim Bridgewood of the 0 Ford plant and Dave Faité) Toronto Moulders. In sum’ total the convey represented progress f0! if OFL, more in line with the mf q militancy displayed by On! working men and wome? past year on a hundred P lines, including picketlit Li unions denied OFL affiliatl® if an outdated CLC consti! and policy. : Ps ee OLS aug eae VT ie ae ee ae WELL, | HAVEN'T BEEN PROMOTED (a ’ 30 YEARS EITHER:-- BUT 1M of) WASTING TIME GRIPING ADOT ~~ fm et i